Moderating, by definition, involves regulating topics of discussion. By definition, that means deleting posts that cross the line, shutting down discussions that are spiralling out of control or off topic, and in extreme cases, banning members so that they can no longer participate. And it happens ALL the time.
GTIDan has expressed his opinion. He has adequately stated it numerous times. In the interest of not pi$$ing off the hundreds, if not thousands, of people who have actually had a HPFP fail, and particularly the cases among those in which people have had to fight VWoA/VWoC to get them to pay up, I am deeming as of right now, that GTIDan has adequately and sufficiently expressed his opinion and that he is not to re-state it yet again.
If GTIDan does not like this position, he is perfectly free to express that opinion somewhere else.
FWIW I am among those who is delaying purchasing any new VW TDI until there is evidence that I deem sufficient, that the HPFP problem has been dealt with, whether by known and documented design change or "lifetime" warranty coverage or whatever. While it seems that failures in Canada are less common for whatever reason, I travel to the USA too much to ignore the issue.
From my perspective, you'd be 100% correct in sitting by the sidelines until something in writing and firm gets written up by VW.
The darn thing is that, as of now, and I realize it's only a snapshot/ freeze frame in time, and early in the life cycle, I am aware of only one misfuel causing a HPFP failure in the B7 Passat. Time will tell, if the solenoid nozzle version with AdBlue makes it through the summer heat down in the southern portions of the USA without cumulative failure.
I sat on the sidelines for 4 years, wanting a CR jetta, but knowing the risks of HPFP failure. The passat, at this point in time, only, is a different animal, so far spared the fuel contamination scenario that occur is minute amounts of Jetta's, Golfs, and JSW's. Wish we had an answer as to why it's doing better than it's brethren.
As a side note, I noticed on Wikipedia that rapeseed / Canola oil has better lubricating property's when emulsified with water, and in preventing corrosion, than other oils. This was first noted in the steam engine era. It's one of those things that make's you go Hmmm? Because all of Europe and a good portion of Canada runs on rapeseed oil or a derivative hydrid plant, Canola seed oil based biodiesel, where as here in the USA, most biodiesel is either waste vegetable oil or virgin soy based biodiesel.
Not all vegetable oils are the same, I found it fascinating the steam engine connection and rapeseed oil clinging to metal better than other vegetable oils of the time in steam engines.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canola
Hundreds of years ago, rapeseed oil was used as a fuel in lamps in Asia and Europe. The Chinese and Indians used a form of rapeseed oil that was unrefined (natural).[10] Its use was limited until the development of steam power, when machinists found rapeseed oil clung to water- or steam-washed metal surfaces better than other lubricants. World War II saw high demand for the oil as a lubricant for the rapidly increasing number of steam engines in naval and merchant ships. When the war blocked European and Asian sources of rapeseed oil, a critical shortage developed and Canada began to expand its limited rapeseed production.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapeseed
Maybe we here in the USA should quit screwing around with soy based biodiesel and start growing rapeseed/ canola oil instead for our biodiesel production? Would it again cling to metal surfaces / act as a barrier to moisture /wet fuel in our HPFP's better than other biodiesel based oils?
One of those things to ponder and make you go Hmmmmm?