VWJayhawk
Veteran Member
Indigo,
I think I see the confusion, the 170hp peak APR has is at a different RPM than the stock HP peak. This is why the peak numbers (hp or tq as you said) doesn't really matter, but (as you said again) the change/under the curve. If you look at the change graph, you will see at 4300 rpm (near stock peak) there is about a 13 hp gain, or very much in line with what you estimated. Earlier on in the power band is where the tuned hp peaks.
I see what you are saying with the peak tq being at a higher rpm, but it does match stock tq at the same rpm; it just peaks higher because it produces more tq. So I believe it may feel more responsive (as opposed to less) since the tq comes on at the same/slightly earlier and then peaks higher/further down the curve.
I appreciate the insight and help, and quite frankly I think all of our problems would be solved if VW would just give us the darn 170hp TDI motors here! Haha
Thanks for sharing your dyno too!
I think I see the confusion, the 170hp peak APR has is at a different RPM than the stock HP peak. This is why the peak numbers (hp or tq as you said) doesn't really matter, but (as you said again) the change/under the curve. If you look at the change graph, you will see at 4300 rpm (near stock peak) there is about a 13 hp gain, or very much in line with what you estimated. Earlier on in the power band is where the tuned hp peaks.
I see what you are saying with the peak tq being at a higher rpm, but it does match stock tq at the same rpm; it just peaks higher because it produces more tq. So I believe it may feel more responsive (as opposed to less) since the tq comes on at the same/slightly earlier and then peaks higher/further down the curve.
I appreciate the insight and help, and quite frankly I think all of our problems would be solved if VW would just give us the darn 170hp TDI motors here! Haha
Thanks for sharing your dyno too!