jimbote
Certified Volkswagen Nut
more for the 50 degree vanagon crowd but interesting nonetheless.
The Core could probably be rotated with lots of machining, boring, tapping, etc. It would be a heck of a challenge for a machinist. Or, the manifold could be cut and welded back on with a more up-right angle.Cant you rotate the core so it points to the drain port more? Not a lot of room. I would plug that hole and go strait into the pan down lower and wrap it in some heat wrap.
really? i have seen very few turbos that cant be lightly modified (usually brackets) to get the oil feed correct.The Core could probably be rotated with lots of machining, boring, tapping, etc. It would be a heck of a challenge for a machinist. Or, the manifold could be cut and welded back on with a more up-right angle.
The trap in the drain pipe is really not the problem with oil draining from the Turbo housing. The problem is that a 50 degree angle raises the drain hole upwards resulting in a "bowl" of ponding oil inside the Turbo housing. The oil level apparently gets high enough to allow it to drain out around the expansion ring seals on either end of the Turbine Shaft. This is especially an issue with the engine idling as there is virtually no back pressure from the exhaust or the pressure side.
Even under ideal conditions, these Turbos dump oil into the intake system and the exhaust.
There is a video somewhere showing only a slight change in angle results in oil getting by the expansion ring seals. Seems I saw it over in the Samba.
the vnt15 turbo chra design does not lend itself to being rotated at all... it has nothing to do with external modifications (easy)... it's the internal vnt mechanism that would require very accurate machining to even begin clocking the chra... now the gtb series is much more easily clocked due to it's self contained chra vnt mechanism.really? i have seen very few turbos that cant be lightly modified (usually brackets) to get the oil feed correct.
its less than ideal especially for a performance application. maybe get some custom AN fittings made to make that turn sooner right out of the turbo rather than later?
aslo why cant it go into the oil pan? or is the angle of the engine making that area of the pan just fully submerged?
interesting idea although it might increase lag as the relatively cooler diesel exhaust gasses cool further on their trip around. I remember the first 2.3 fox mustang turbo cars used a similar approach to turbo mounting, turbo was basically on the intake with a suck through carb and fed exhaust gas from the other side of the engine via downpipe that snaked all the way under the oil pan. Cool little carsAnyone ever consider a remote mounted turbo? Like using one of the SOHC 2.0L engine exhaust manifolds with the single outlet (like the AVH or AZG) and fabricating a pipe to go to a turbo that is mounted down lower or wherever.
I always thought the 944 turbo had a neat setup. If anyone isn't familiar with them, they actually had the turbo mounted over on the intake. They ran the exhaust down into a collector, under the engine, then back up to the intake which was on the opposite side of the engine (crossflow). I know the ALH is not a crossflow head, but that really doesn't matter since the intercooler is going to necessitate the charge air path leave the engine manifold area anyway.
But the 944, like the naturally born diesel T3, has its engine laid down sort of on its side too. Not nearly as far, but they did package one big I-4 under the hood of the sleek 944.
I think the turbo is probably still best to be mounted down on/under the side of the block though in this application. And this would of course mean parting ways with the compact nature of the manifold/turbo combo.