ccbsecu
Veteran Member
...do Audi 2.0 TDi's run the same engines as VW 2.0 TDi's...?
Yes there is.Is there a precedence for this draconian measure?
Stupid lolhttps://www.dailymotion.com/video/xc558j_cheap-trick-audi-a3-tdi-green-car-s_fun
#truthinenginerring
Seems like the Clean Police have struck again!
VW is fooked. Stand by for many months for your status if you own a 09-15 TDI.THREE DAY OLD Thread with 131 pages. Can someone summarize this for me?
Needs to be arms length. Manufacturer testing their own product is not sufficient.Most government agencies have been doing more with less for years and been losing purchasing power for equipment/ research/ staff due to inflation.
I think testing should be funded by the company, I don't care you actually does it as long as it is truthful.
CR TDIs bad
PD and earlier TDIs good
VW crooked
EPA crooked
Yes.THREE DAY OLD Thread with 131 pages. Can someone summarize this for me?
This is what I thought of ever since the hysteria began.THREE DAY OLD Thread with 131 pages. Can someone summarize this for me?
I think it's likely a cost and complexity thing. EPA says you can't have a different program when being tested, so once EPA came up with a set of driving conditions that they thought was representative of driving conditions that become the test. Just guessing here.No, the test could be presented in general terms. If the EPA were serious it should not even be the same test. The cars should be tested randomly with random tests and statistics can be used to derive if a car model passes or not.
Of course this is if the EPA were serious in mandating compliance.
The ICE just provides electric power for the motor in extended range operation. It isn't intended to charge the battery. Mountain mode is the only time the ICE will put anything into the battery, and that is limited. Most of the generator's power is used to propel the car.He's talking about the onboard ICE. When the battery's depleted or is put on hold, the ICE turns on, which turns the generator that puts juice back into the battery while your driving.
I figure that was covered under "crooked".don't forget EPA, VW collusion and massive VW buyback program
Maybe, but it's like a student grading his own exam.I think it's likely a cost and complexity thing. EPA says you can't have a different program when being tested, so once EPA came up with a set of driving conditions that they thought was representative of driving conditions that become the test. Just guessing here.
He's probably misinformed and looking at the 23o6 update which was VW's first failed attempt ... Though that doesn't make sense at I thought 15 was an EA288 and 23o6 didn't apply.Just got off the phone with my local VW dealer and they already said there was an ECU update for my 15 golf TDi to resolve the emissions problem. Seems to have happened faster than people expected. I'm too afraid to go get the update for fear of a reduction in power. Hopefully someone else can be the guinea pig.
If there was a recall on my wife I would be psyched,OMG, I can't believe this, first my car is part of DieselGate and now through reading this I find out my coffee maker is part of KeurigGate....
What else will I learn in here, a recall on the wife?
Well, we don't know how much the numbers will change. And most of use are easily getting 6-8 more MPG than the currently stated numbers. So, even if they do go down, we would still likely be hitting the advertised numbers anyway.This will have to be a buy back, because now it's false advertising. You can't post a mpg number and be way off, and same with power. You can't advertise and sell a 150hp car when it now only makes 140. And I'm pretty sure it's safe to assume that when the issues are "fixed" the numbers on both mpg and hp/tq will take a dive.
Guess time will tell, but my money is on this is going to be like the gm buyback.
From what I understand the test is a simulation of throttle positions for different duration of time and with variation in speed and probably engine temperatures.Maybe, but it's like a student grading his own exam.
And driving is such a diverse activity I don't see the point of a single test, other than keeping it stupidly simple.
Thank you Brother from the north... a good laugh indeed!OMG, I can't believe this, first my car is part of DieselGate and now through reading this I find out my coffee maker is part of KeurigGate....
What else will I learn in here, a recall on the wife?
Sounds like a straightforward test. Any idea how much time the testing takes?From what I understand the test is a simulation of throttle positions for different duration of time and with variation in speed and probably engine temperatures.
Not a clue, and I'm guess others here know way more about the test than I do.Sounds like a straightforward test. Any idea how much time the testing takes?
Lawyers aren't free. There are plenty out there. Opt out of the CA and hire your own and have at it. No one is going to help you for nothing.I want my money back on my car or a brand new one without these issues. Forget class action bullsh** lawsuits. The only people that make any money on them is the freakin lawyers that start them. In the Toyota lawsuit, the people only got a refund of $21 per person while the 85 lawyers got around $227 million. Make sure that if you want to sue Volkswagen directly, you opt out of the class action crap when they offer you a check for $10. Where are the lawyers to help get us a new car? We need lawyers that will help us sue for our money back like lemon law lawyers do.
I hate to say it, but your article spews more NO2 than my Sportwagen on the highway.
I suspect that potential EPA fines and customer restitution are unrelated.Is it possible VW could buy back all the affected vehicles? It seems like it would save them a whole lot more money. They will pay $74K in fines for my two Tdis, but the book value is under $30K for both of them. Not that I want this to happen, I am just sick of the selective enforcement the Fed practices.
HAHA! Good one!Here's what they're going to do for the recall: Install spark plugs where the glow plugs used to go; Lower the fuel injection pressure; Reprogram the ECU to control the spark ignition system; Attach a TSI badge to the rear of the car; Remove the mis-fuelling device from the fuel filling hole; Provide a supplement to the owner's manual with new fuelling instructions specifying the minimum octane requirements.
I stopped reading at the first inaccuracy: "The EPA is a giant federal government bureaucracy that has set standards for vehicle exhaust emissions among other things since the 1960s." The EPA didn't exist until 1970.
Thanks for posting your reviews. I'm glad I didn't waste my time reading that blog.I hate to say it, but your article spews more NO2 than my Sportwagen on the highway.