crazy paul
Veteran Member
I know this has been discussed more or less ad nauseum in the past, but please bear with me. I was posting in the French Quarter (Quebec discussion group)...expounding on the advantages of the Ventectomy, and how diesel will not expand like gas. Well, a gas station attendent came back and said the correction factors they used for diesel and gas were very close.
Well, after a little research on the web, I came up with the following (sorry about the metric Yanks...)
Coefficient of thermal expansion/degree Celcius:
Gas=.000945
Diesel=.000824
Therefore, for a 55 litre fillup (14.5 US Gal), assuming a 15 C (27F) degree change in temperature(ie: from 15 in the ground to 30 in the tank some time later), the gas would expand to 55.78 litres and the diesel to 55.68 litres. That is only .1 of a litre difference (.21 oz). /images/graemlins/shocked.gif
If these numbers are correct, and with all of these Ventectominers filling up to the cap, why isn't there any anecdotal evidence of fuel expansion messes? /images/graemlins/confused.gif
Please no flaming, just polite, adult discussion...
Well, after a little research on the web, I came up with the following (sorry about the metric Yanks...)
Coefficient of thermal expansion/degree Celcius:
Gas=.000945
Diesel=.000824
Therefore, for a 55 litre fillup (14.5 US Gal), assuming a 15 C (27F) degree change in temperature(ie: from 15 in the ground to 30 in the tank some time later), the gas would expand to 55.78 litres and the diesel to 55.68 litres. That is only .1 of a litre difference (.21 oz). /images/graemlins/shocked.gif
If these numbers are correct, and with all of these Ventectominers filling up to the cap, why isn't there any anecdotal evidence of fuel expansion messes? /images/graemlins/confused.gif
Please no flaming, just polite, adult discussion...