Gern, you and your brother rock.
I've got in mind a modified two-tank VO system:
I don't ever wan't my tdi to run on 100% VO. I am worried from reading other's experiences that the tdi pump and injectors do not tolerate VO well over the long term.
However, I really think a blend of dino/vo can be run safely. Here's how I see VO versus dino diesel:
Pro's Con's
VO Good lubricity w/ right oil Varnish on injectors..
Dino Less varnish Poor lubricity/corrosive
So, given my background as a chemist, I'd like to use 'viscosity proportioning.' It'll use a 3 way proportioning valve: A, B, A+B
It would work like this:
At shutdown from a long trip, I'd switch from A+B to just A (dino diesel) to purge the lines of VO.
At the next startup, I'd switch it back to A+B. Initially, the VO would be cold. Correspondingly, it's viscosity would be quite a bit higher than dino diesel. The proportion of dino/VO blend would scale in inverse proportion to the viscometric ratio:
[viscosity of dino at Td:fixed temp(explained later)]
________________________
[Viscosity of VO at Tvo] (time)
VO viscosity has a functional dependency on temperature and time ( waste heat input into tank system more accurately, but time is good enough approximation) and its intrinsic viscosity
Initially, both temperatures are at ambient temperature, and the ratio strongly favors dino diesel. As the VO tank temp increases, its viscositie decreases, according to its viscometric properties (called the Mark-Heuwink parameters.)
After some time, the VO tank temperatures reaches natural equilibrium set point. This temperature difference determines the steady-state viscosity (and fuel composition) ratio.
I don't have those parameters yet. It'd take a Cann-Ubelhold (?) glass viscometer and knowledge of average molecular weight of a vo ( I know this could be wildly varied from one source to the next, but you'd get a ballpark to work with.)
Next, the fuel return line would have to be rerouted to the vo/secondary tank. I wouldn't wan't VO in my dino diesel, but dino in VO is just fine.
Without any parameters, I'd just guess that the dino diesel would always have lower viscosity at our operating temperatures (but not sure, just a guess, eh...) If that were the case, the fuel composition at steady-state would be more in favor of dino diesel, keeping varnish to minimum, while having added lubricity from the VO. Each complementing the other. As the trip wore on, dino tank would empty out first, and VO tank would get progressively richer in dino. You could just move the switch to B tank only to prevent going dry and sucking air bubbles (and saving a small amount of dino in tank A for your shut-down purging ritual.)
If the reverse case is true (viscosity of VO less than dino's at elevated temperature) than the VO tank draws down faster but also get's progressively richer in dino diesel from return line (less so than in the first case.)
In either case, the amount of VO being burned in the engine is very gradually increasing, until it reaches equilibrium set-point VO tank temperatures stabilizes. The engine never burns straight VO, varnish buildup is avoided, but lubricity is always improved over straight dino diesel.
Best of both worlds, unless I've made obvious missed errors...( please correct.)
What do ya'll think?