LurkerMike
Veteran Member
Has anyone tried a 10mm IP in an automatic instead of the original 11mm pump?
The automatics have a fuel cooler in the return line that is located under the passenger seat.Syndicate said:The only thing I could think of is to save fuel? But I think the efficiency would come into question, which would probably negate the savings in the first place.
I don't want to be the first, at least not right now... that's why I asked.J double R said:ive never heard of anyone who has downgraded their IP, ever. let us know how it goes, mike.
LurkerMike said:The automatics have a fuel cooler in the return line that is located under the passenger seat.
Why?
Because of the huge amount of fuel being bypassed. There has got to be some parasitic loss in running the 11mm pump on small orifice injectors vs a 10mm pump with big hole injectors.
My automatic, Whitey, is RC2 with KERMA 357's. It runs like it should have from the factory and gets 2-3 mpg better fuel economy than it did when we bought it bone stock. But it averages 34 - 36 mpg with my lead foot. It has seen 42 mpg once on a long trip with the cruise set to 55 mph. 38 is the best it has ever gotten since that one trip that put me to sleep.
My thinking is the 11mm pump was selected for the automatics because the injector orifices were so much smaller than the ones on the 5 speeds. By going to a larger injector and a smaller pump, cruising efficiency should be improved some. Granted, this is at a loss of maximum power, but RC2 and 357's are the most the poor old 01M could probably handle with my size 14's stomping the pedals. That rules out larger nozzles that would make the 11mm pump run more efficiently.
I'm wondering if anyone has tested these ideas in an auto?
But the 11mm pump and .158's nozzles are FACTORY in every North American automatic. I see your point about at least greater pump wear.mojogoes said:I think its reasonable to think that with said 11mm pump and .158's nozzles its very plausible that some damage would be caused to the pump.........i know that TDI RS's 12mm pump was damaged in this way when putting in some 184's just to clean and balance up the R520's he was using........it was reported that the back pressure with the smaller holes caused the catastrophic demise of the pump.
I would just think the 11mm had more NOx emission than the 10mm with same nozzle size beacause of the faster injection of fuel, higher PCP and so higher PCTs wich create the eeevil NOxmojogoes said:The 11mm and .158 orifices/injectors were chosen for the US/Can market because of your emission regulations = 90hp for less emissions than the Euro equivalent e.g 10mm and .184's which give more Nox/smoke output.
ini said:Surely the 11mm pump and smaller nozzles is an attempt to acheive better atomization of the fuel.
Giving a faster/more powerful/advanced burn for an equal or less volume of fuel, thus increasing the efficiency and offsetting the auto losses.
With the amount of research that went into the original VE engines i cannot believe that it would be a mistake or an oversight.
But the 11mm pump is exclusive to the North American market automatics.Rub87 said:I would just think the 11mm had more NOx emission than the 10mm with same nozzle size beacause of the faster injection of fuel, higher PCP and so higher PCTs wich create the eeevil NOx
LurkerMike said:But the 11mm pump is exclusive to the North American market automatics.
VW only used the 10mm pumps in all other markets, manual or automatic transmission.
The 01M automatic has a lock-up torque converter which stops all transmission slippage on highway cruises. And while the 01M still has a heavier spinning mass and pumping losses, the typical 5-10 mpg of fuel economy lost to the "rare and desirable" automatics in North America just does not add up to me. I believe the 11mm injector pump and nozzle size combination are a larger part of the economy loss than most have considered.
I would say the average stock North American market A4 TDI 5-speed gets around 45mpg highway and the 01M version gets around 38 mpg. And the average 5-speed A4 TDI will beat the average 01M A4 TDI every time, any way you want to race them. While I agree the greatest reason for this disparity is the 01M is a piece of crap transmission, I do not believe it is solely responsible.
Do you know about where your tune is in power?AUGSX said:Before my tune, my car ran just fine. Now with the tune I am waiting for the 01M to just blow up. It hasn't with about 6k miles with mods and tune. Oh ya read sig for mods.