Occams_Razor
Veteran Member
Clutch Disc Size. 228mm with a 240mm plate?
Hi All,
I was looking at what clutch to use with my ERF transmission and found that EuroSpec has a setup where a 228mm disc is used with the 240mm pressure plate.
Since EuroSpec seems to have an aversion to answering emails I sent a note to ECS Tuning, (who is a EuroSpec dealer), asking:
What is the difference between the 2M4 198 CFS 28 RPD Stock weight cast flywheel, dual diaphragm cover, 228mm performance disc and the 2M4 198 CFS 40 SPD Stock weight cast flywheel, stock cover, 240mm performance disc?
Why is the disc smaller on the 28 RPD?
Which cover holds more torque? Dual diaphragm or the stock cover?
and got the following response back:
The 2m4198 cfs 28rpd is a smaller disk, used in the vr6 engine. The disk is also dampened so it will make a little less chatter. Both of these are single mass flywheels. Both covers will hold the same amount of torque.
Not quite answering the question I asked...
Does anyone have the technical reasoning why a smaller disc would be beneficial, (or not as the case may be)?
Hi All,
I was looking at what clutch to use with my ERF transmission and found that EuroSpec has a setup where a 228mm disc is used with the 240mm pressure plate.
Since EuroSpec seems to have an aversion to answering emails I sent a note to ECS Tuning, (who is a EuroSpec dealer), asking:
What is the difference between the 2M4 198 CFS 28 RPD Stock weight cast flywheel, dual diaphragm cover, 228mm performance disc and the 2M4 198 CFS 40 SPD Stock weight cast flywheel, stock cover, 240mm performance disc?
Why is the disc smaller on the 28 RPD?
Which cover holds more torque? Dual diaphragm or the stock cover?
and got the following response back:
The 2m4198 cfs 28rpd is a smaller disk, used in the vr6 engine. The disk is also dampened so it will make a little less chatter. Both of these are single mass flywheels. Both covers will hold the same amount of torque.
Not quite answering the question I asked...
Does anyone have the technical reasoning why a smaller disc would be beneficial, (or not as the case may be)?
Last edited: