Originally Posted by
SVTWEB
So the long of the short is the Start/Stop cycles are the detriment to the design, not the mileage.
V-Rod
I agree ^^^ But I think when it comes to this particular motor I think high RPM's are another factor.
My 06 Jetta just turned over 170,000 miles. Engine has no cam problems yet. I change my oil every 10,000 miles and I change the oil filter every 20,000 I use a 5-40 505 oil. Average 1 way drive is 60 miles.
Car drives in some extreme conditions, hottest being 105 coldest so far being -44F plus gravel roads.
Well lets see in 2006/2007 the first cam wear shows up on a BRM after 39000 miles. It was analysed to death and it wasn't cam bearing wear as first predicted by both frank and eddif. Prior to this, cam wear was showing up on some Passats and Bew. After having to torch out siezed followers Frank declares its not enough oil and the oil passages are being block by cam bearing wear and the followers are not getting enough oil. This is where Franks cam bearing mods were developed.
Anyways the used oil analysis would soon have picked up on the start stop theory as this analysis has been well documented for BRM.
How about taking another look at my theory. Lets see if the valve spring forces push the cam up and the hydraulic followers on the cylinders that are on compression and ignition take up the clearance as they are designed to do.
Then what happens to those followers when the injector fires at there usual 10,000/14000 psi when cruising at 1800/2300 rpm. The valves are held closed by compression and igniting and expanding gasses as well as springs.
No the bearings are not taking the load the followers are!
I have the pictures to prove it. Now does this happen all the time, enough that a conservative driver like myself found this issue starting at 35000 miles.
I have the pictures to show pickup and galling on the closed dwell portion of the cam which coincides exactly with the injector firing and the followers on #1 exhaust and #2 exhaust had the centers ripped out. Yes hardened steel ripped out by galling. The cam lobes were fine but there was pickup on the closed portion of the cam dwell.
Like I said if you have a coarsely ground cam the closed dwell portion does not break in to allow the normal squeeze lube film to develope that a smooth surface would. The injection happens in 2 to 3 millisecs. This contact of surfaces actually shears the black coating away over time and if the cam is not smooth it will destroy the center dot of the follower( this has nothing to do with the lobe). Thus the term follower center dot wear which eddif determined was caused by shock forces. I now have pictures to prove it.
If I was buying a cam I would make sure to the seller ahead of time that if the closed dwell was not smooth I would be returning the cam for a full refund.
Now I expect you guys to read this and comment. I have commented on your theory so I expect a reply.