Exactly. FFS. Who looks at a $100k+ car and even calls that a daily? Sure compared to the multi-million dollar price of a bugatti thats a steal. Who is that a daily for the guy who has 6 houses a small private yacht and etc... to feel good about his ofsetting climate change?If you can spend over $125K on a daily driver.
Maybe I'm missing something in your response... but I don't think anyone is saying that model S Plaid is not quick, nor an interesting or an advancement in engineering. But I would argue that there is an active market in this country for a 65k vehicle, MANY new pickups are going for around that price range and being bought actively, and upwards into about the 75 - 80k range.... The average price of new car is in this country was 38.960 for 2020... that doesn't mean that a 65k isn't consider premium. I guess my point is this for lets say the average car is 39k for easy rounding, someone can much more easily justify to themselves a 60 or 65k car. But going all the way up over 100k is likely not going to happen. So I'm much more in the belief that the Model S regular at 75k is a much more useful car on the market since it is more in the range, or even the Model 3 since that is about the average.... and thus actually sells in volume. Example: in 2020 Tesla sold, produced, and delivered 54,805 Model S/X, and 454,932 Model 3/Y.... So my point is basically the Model S is useless only to the fringe for an environmental impact point, which the 3 and Y actually make a difference because of volume. But keeping that in mind for prospective, Tesla sold less car globally as a whole as Ford just sold F-Series trucks in the US. So WAY more excited about the F150 lightning and hoping for large scale adoption, as that will make an even larger impact if it sells in volume replacing other F-Series sales.I'd be willing to bet that most Model S purchased are used as daily drivers. Sure, they are out of reach for most folks, but so is a $65k car. Globally the average price of a new car is probably well under $20k. That doesn't make the Plaid S any less impressive.
Yes, I think you missed something. You asked who buys a $120k daily driver. My answer is most of the Plaid Model S will be daily drivers. Wealthy people will buy them. Think doctors, lawyers, executives, TSLA investors etc. They will sell as fast as Tesla can build them. Considering that it's the quickest, most technologically advanced production car ever made, I'd call it a bargain(for wealthy folks who like fast cars). I would tend to agree that most $100k+ cars are garage queens of the very wealthy. Plaid S isn't that.Maybe I'm missing something in your response... but I don't think anyone is saying that model S Plaid is not quick, nor an interesting or an advancement in engineering. But I would argue that there is an active market in this country for a 65k vehicle,
Ok, so I was trying to be diplomatic. As always, there are exceptions.Reasonable? You must not see some of the posts I've read. I think the most generous I can be towards EV enthusiasts here is that they're no more or less biased than the average TDI enthusiast here.
The first half of this statement really bugs me - seems like "throwaway culture"/"you should buy it because it's new and improved".nwdiver said:We need to get over this idea of holding on to something we have instead of actually looking at the numbers on whether it makes sense to keep it.
Not because it's new and improved but because continuing to use it is more expensive (economically or environmentally) than replacing it. That's why I'm holding on to my 'classic' P85 instead up upgrading to plaid but I ditched my old TDI as soon as I could. As 'new and improved' as the new Model S is it's not a ~3x increase in efficiency like I got upgrading from my TDI.you should buy it because it's new and improved".
Well. I currently have PHEV but I am having major issues w/ it. If stuff keeps up maybe a lemon law and then potentially an EV like a Mach-E, E-tron regular.Enough with the pot stirring. Let's get this thread back on track to the original topic of
"Who's going to Tesla after their current Tdi"
Answers like "Nope, I'm going to Lucid." Or "Nope I'm going to get a Rivian" etcetera are acceptable discourse because at least they honor the premise of the question of going from diesel to electric. Talking about the topic and closely related topic is cool.
General EV bashing is just trolling. EV prostheltyzing is equally annoying and obnoxious.
So act like an adult and knock that chit off.
Haha I feel you there.... S/X both well out of my range. M 3/Y maybe not so much. But I've detailed why not got me above.... honest q5 PHEV prestige fully loaded I got was literally the most expensive car I've ever purchased by double almost triple.... I couldn't stretch further even if I wanted to...Oh I knew the Spaceballs reference, and it is certainly clever. Still not buying one (well, I couldn't even if I wanted to).
Yeah, I think its where you live. My mother in law lives in the plattsburgh NY area and they are sourced from hydro 100% and her electricity is like .02 / kwh it would make huge sense there as well.Definitely should do it if you're in Maine since your electricity is sourced through hydrodams and renewable/recyclable wood.
This is where I see EV's benefit: in States which are proactive about such initiatives. Here in NY, one would better off purchase a Hyundai K5 GT for a 1/4 price if they want a solid DD which can also give you the occasional giggles.
This is a great idea. Never thought of it. But getting an early MKIV out of Spain or Italy (no rust) would be awesome. As regulations discourage driving older diesels in Europe values will probably continue to fall. I'd go for an early Golf Wagon or a PD150 Jetta Sedan.Waiting for the 25 year mark to import a euro spec mk4 TDI.