2003, actually.TornadoRed said:the Golf V was introduced in Europe in 2004
2003, actually.TornadoRed said:the Golf V was introduced in Europe in 2004
I'm with brucetmoose. My 2000 Golf GLS TDI has the velour seats in that very light tan color. After 204,000 miles, they're still like NEW. I am REALLY impressed. The only velour that got worn was the edge of the center console armrest. I replaced that recently for $84, IIRC. When I bought the car, I would have preferred the flat cloth, because I thought it'd wear better than the velour. I expected the velour to get bald spots in high-wear areas. Only on the edge of the armrest did that happen. I've spilled drinks on that light tan velour, gotten greasy smudges from a belly pan that was in the back seat, and it all cleaned up great with simple carpet cleaner. If I had kids, I would probably not want that light tan, however.pdxgrease said:try spilling a latte on the velour vs. leather. Leather is more durable and stays looking newer.
The cloth seats in my 1985 700,000 miles on the clock Jetta TDs still look like new . Compare that to the last Audi 5000 TD I had with leather seats hard enough to drive a nail with then . Nothing like a 24 hour drive while sitting on a rock , hard & coldfrugality said:I'm with brucetmoose. My 2000 Golf GLS TDI has the velour seats in that very light tan color. After 204,000 miles, they're still like NEW. I am REALLY impressed. The only velour that got worn was the edge of the center console armrest. I replaced that recently for $84, IIRC. When I bought the car, I would have preferred the flat cloth, because I thought it'd wear better than the velour. I expected the velour to get bald spots in high-wear areas. Only on the edge of the armrest did that happen. I've spilled drinks on that light tan velour, gotten greasy smudges from a belly pan that was in the back seat, and it all cleaned up great with simple carpet cleaner. If I had kids, I would probably not want that light tan, however.
I also like the way you don't feel like you're sliding around, like you do on leather or pleather (plastic leather). The only downside to velour is if you wear corderoy pants. You almost stick like velcro on that stuff.But the velour is never cold in the winter like leather/pleather, or hot in the summertime.
That's the way I feel about my fleece seatcovers. I'm pretty sure the cloth underneath is like new.frugality said:But the velour is never cold in the winter like leather/pleather, or hot in the summertime.
I agree, but I have to say that I am VERY impressed with the leatherette in my new '07 Passat wagon. It looks like leather. Only thing missing is the smell.pdxgrease said:try spilling a latte on the velour vs. leather. Leather is more durable and stays looking newer.
Couldn't agree more, have the grey in my '00 and it's great.frugality said:I'm with brucetmoose. My 2000 Golf GLS TDI has the velour seats in that very light tan color. After 204,000 miles, they're still like NEW. I am REALLY impressed. The only velour that got worn was the edge of the center console armrest. I replaced that recently for $84, IIRC. When I bought the car, I would have preferred the flat cloth, because I thought it'd wear better than the velour. I expected the velour to get bald spots in high-wear areas. Only on the edge of the armrest did that happen. I've spilled drinks on that light tan velour, gotten greasy smudges from a belly pan that was in the back seat, and it all cleaned up great with simple carpet cleaner. If I had kids, I would probably not want that light tan, however.
I also like the way you don't feel like you're sliding around, like you do on leather or pleather (plastic leather). The only downside to velour is if you wear corderoy pants. You almost stick like velcro on that stuff.But the velour is never cold in the winter like leather/pleather, or hot in the summertime.
I would love if they did what Hyundai does. Offer a free website with all their service manuals and listing all their TSBs. One of my favorite things about owning the Hyundai, I never had to buy a service manual to do anything.Dorado said:The Polo TDI would be a big hit. Too bad they already named the Golf the new Rabbit, because they could have used that name for the Polo.
But to sell bigger volume of smaller cars, they do need to address the dealer network in the US. Copy from the success of the Mini: no haggling and internet customized ordering. Use the web for service too: have a website in which owners can access their service records, check for upcoming service, etc. SO basically, get off their ...![]()
Actually to get service manuals go to hmaservice.com and sign up. You need to do it in IE, foxfire wont work.frugality said:Y'know, it isn't THAT hard to find this sort of thing...![]()
http://hyundaiusa.com/owners/myhyundai/login.aspx
It may work with opera or some other browser, just found firefox to not work. Thats actually the only time I use IE is to go on that site.PlaneCrazy said:Guess I won't get one. I don't use IE...Safari and Firefox all the way, Mac OS X 10.4.9, Mac Pro, dual Xeon dual core 2.66 GHz (4 cores running, lusting for the Woodcrest processors...), 2 GB RAM, 250 + 500 GB hard drive, 23" monitor. Boot camp allows me to dual boot into my MSDN copy of Vista Ultimate...but I only use that for Flight Sim and testing the application my employer builds. Vista sucks otherwise: resource hog eye candy with no significant advantages over XP, and security so awfully annoying that any power user is compelled to disable it making it worthless. If I didn't have to use it to test our application, I wouldn't, I'd stick to XP for the flight sim stuff.
Sorry for the thread drift...
Rather, "Wake up, stupid American consumers!" VW would love to sell more diesels here if they could justify it. There's a huge cost involved with bringing over a whole new line of engines/trim/replacement parts/etc. So far, VW's management hasn't been able to justify it. Add to that the more stringent emissions requirements, and I'd have to say that VW is doing pretty good, all things considered.vwmk4 said:Wake up VWOA!
Firefox has an add-on called IE Tab that emulates IE within Firefox. Try it. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.lbhskier37 said:It may work with opera or some other browser, just found firefox to not work. Thats actually the only time I use IE is to go on that site.
It's not a business case that is holding back diesel in the USA - it's purely emissions and EPA rules. VW sold every TDI they shipped, mostly without incentives or price cuts. The same thing can't be said for their 2.0 and 2.5 models.frugality said:Rather, "Wake up, stupid American consumers!" VW would love to sell more diesels here if they could justify it. There's a huge cost involved with bringing over a whole new line of engines/trim/replacement parts/etc. So far, VW's management hasn't been able to justify it.
Yeah, I've heard that too. But I've also heard that the ratios won't apply to a 50-state certified diesel. To me that sounds as if they should be able to sell as many 2008 diesels as they want. Is this correct??MrMopar said:It's not a business case that is holding back diesel in the USA - it's purely emissions and EPA rules. VW sold every TDI they shipped, mostly without incentives or price cuts. The same thing can't be said for their 2.0 and 2.5 models.
Emissions in general has been holding back new VW diesels, and their market share of diesel sales was further capped by the ratios of TDI vs. Gassers that VW must sell. Don't know exact numbers, but an example of balancing the fleet sales is that VW can sell one TDI for every 4 gasser models that attain ULEV standards. So their TDI sales are limited in absolute numbers due to overall sales of gassers.
Exactly... I wish I would have got leather.pdxgrease said:try spilling a latte on the velour vs. leather. Leather is more durable and stays looking newer.