bubbagumpshrimp
Veteran Member
As far as I've read...there are literally zero comparable examples, where automotive suits are concerned. That is what makes this case so interesting. As multiple law professors have stated in news pieces...this case is unique in that before a trial even starts...guilt has already been established. For that reason, there is literally no bar from which to measure this case against to estimate compensation. It could be $500 and "my bad"...or it could be buyback at purchase price plus $5,000+ damages. I realize that last one is ridiculously outside the scope of reasonable expectations, but my point is that no one has any idea of even a ballpark estimate of what the result will be.I dont see examples of this in the realm of automobile/manufacturer litigation
If you have solid examples of auto litigation that supports some of the more "fragile" arguments I'm all ears
As far as the whiny snowflake thing...they don't have to prove anything. Keep in mind that VW already admitted to the fraud. The only thing left to determine will be how to compensate customers.