If you read the articles, VW has already admitted guilt in the software scheme. At this point, they have no challenge.
And they only admitted guilt after being threatened with 2016 Diesel vehicles certs being rejected.
If you read the articles, VW has already admitted guilt in the software scheme. At this point, they have no challenge.
They are not playing chess here...an admission of guilt is an admission of guilt.And they only admitted guilt after being threatened with 2016 Diesel vehicles certs being rejected.
And they only admitted guilt after being threatened with 2016 Diesel vehicles certs being rejected.
They are not playing chess here...an admission of guilt is an admission of guilt.
Please! Americans have been defeating their own emissions systems themselves for as long as they have been required and to far dirtier limits than this probably did. Go look at the performance forum here and you tube videos of cars and trucks "rolling coal" where owners do the same thing. Many other mfg's have done other things as well. I just read about trucking companies buying new chassis and putting old rebuilt engines/drive trains/axles in them to get around emissions. VW is just the latest to get caught doing something wrong.This is REALLY terrible.
As Americans, we've set emissions limits on vehicles. Rather than comply, a manufacturer decides to cheat, by making its car seem clean to regulators while knowing that, out on the roads, the cars will be far dirtier. "Screw you, Americans, we found a way to cheat and we don't think you'll do anything about it."
All to chase profit.
I hope government regulators exact a penalty large enough to deter VW and other manufacturers from cheating like this again.
Just terrible.
A quick recalculation shows nearly $20 billion worth of potential fines. $37,500 per vehicle plus another $3,750 per vehicle times 482,000 vehicles. That doesn't even include the cost of bringing all of the existing vehicles into compliance.From the Detroit Free Press (might be verbatim as NY Times, etc - all likely from Associated Press)
http://www.freep.com/story/money/ca...used-software-skirt-emissions-rules/72399372/
From the article:
VW may be liable for civil penalties of up to $37,500 per vehicle found to be violating the standard, or potentially more than $18 billion.
Well that's nice, so basically VW may need to cough up the value of my car (plus some) to the federal government for a slap on the hand, meanwhile what will owners get?
"Oh, sorry about that - our bad. Here's a free software update, a coupon for a free oil change and DEF refill (which we'll screw up), a free hat and our very sincere apologies that we'll NEVER do that again".
Schmucks.
would be cheaper for them, than the fine, i doubt any diesel originally cost more than the fine. maybe give us the options, lolNo.
And I am a lawyer.
Best case scenario is a class action lawsuit if MPG decreases below advertised.No.
And I am a lawyer.
Lawyer here.No because the mileage on TDIs is typically in excess of the stated mileage on the window sticker, likely due to this NOx noncompliance. Fixing the problem will result in advertised mileage. If the upcoming recall results in you getting substantially lower than the window sticker advertised mileage, you might have a case.
If we have to take our TDI in for service can we refuse any recall/ updates? after all it IS our vehicle. If I have a warranty (I also have service to 30K) i do NOT want them touching emissions on my 2015 Golf.
Buying a vehicle back does not absolve them of fines. The buy-back (or repairs) would be in addition to any fines levied.would be cheaper for them, than the fine, i doubt any diesel originally cost more than the fine. maybe give us the options, lol
Lawyer here.
If, as was the case in my experience, the salesmen at the dealership boasted about the fact that these cars regularly exceed the EPA estimates -- "It'll do better than a Prius on the highway" -- then you could very well have a case.
The fact that this will likely affect the re-sale value of these cars is probably a strong enough basis for a suit. The reputation of how these cars perform in practice, above and beyond the EPA estimates, arguably is a huge part of their appeal, new and used.
If the recall affects the longevity of the engines -- another much boasted-about characteristic of the cars -- then that adds to the case, too.
Volkswagen, it seems, sold these cars knowing that they were not actually compliant with regulations, and knowing also that if they were made to be compliant, they would perform worse and possibly even be less reliable long term. That's a major, major problem for Volkswagen, from the standpoint of getting fined by the government, and also from the standpoint of getting the business end of a class action lawsuit.
I should make clear, when I say "you might have a case," I'm talking about getting damages in a class action lawsuit. I don't think there's likely to be grounds for a buyback. That would require something a lot more egregious than this.
Not likely. Id say prove it. I will not accept any "repairs" willingly that reduce my economy. I will simply avoid the dealer id they are forcing it. Otherwise ill jusr sell my 2015 and find an attorney to sue themFor federal emissions related recalls? Doubt it. The controlling device would be the inability to renew your registration.