Tom Brown
Veteran Member
Using a ScanGaugeII and a GPS, I made an interesting observation with regard to tire size versus tire air pressure.
Readings were done by driving at 165 kph for a couple of minutes to exaggerate any calibration errors that exist. That's as high as I care to take it. Worse, I had to hold it there for a couple of minutes to let the GPS stabalize.
Tires: Pirelli Carving 195/70 R15.
Test 1 - pressure: 34 psi
Test 1 - calibration: 5% on the SG II (actual mis-calibration is estimated to be 5.3)
Test 1 - As I would increase speed slowly, the GPS would increment to the next increment of 1 KPH higher a touch before the SG II.
Test 2 - pressure: 40 psi
Test 2 - calibration: 5% on the SG II (actual mis-calibration is estimated to be 4.8)
Test 2 - As I would increase speed slowly, the SGII would increment to the next increment of 1 KPH higher before the GPS.
Conclusion: tire pressure makes some, but extremely little, difference to tire circumference.
Readings were done by driving at 165 kph for a couple of minutes to exaggerate any calibration errors that exist. That's as high as I care to take it. Worse, I had to hold it there for a couple of minutes to let the GPS stabalize.
Tires: Pirelli Carving 195/70 R15.
Test 1 - pressure: 34 psi
Test 1 - calibration: 5% on the SG II (actual mis-calibration is estimated to be 5.3)
Test 1 - As I would increase speed slowly, the GPS would increment to the next increment of 1 KPH higher a touch before the SG II.
Test 2 - pressure: 40 psi
Test 2 - calibration: 5% on the SG II (actual mis-calibration is estimated to be 4.8)
Test 2 - As I would increase speed slowly, the SGII would increment to the next increment of 1 KPH higher before the GPS.
Conclusion: tire pressure makes some, but extremely little, difference to tire circumference.