Switchgrass article in Chicago Tribune

MrMopar

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Location
Bloomington, IL
TDI
none
A grass worth getting high on

Prairie plant seen as promising fuel option

By Bob Secter
Tribune staff reporter
Published November 28, 2006

CHILLICOTHE, Iowa -- If there were such a thing as a Comeback Plant of the Year award--maybe Comeback of the Century--a top contender would have to be switch grass, a dominant part of the tallgrass prairie that once blanketed much of North America.

That vast sea of grasses, so thick and high that pioneers said it could swallow a rider on horseback, all but disappeared as sodbusters ripped it away to make room for lush and productive cropland.

What was an obstacle to progress 150 years ago suddenly is getting a fresh, hard look as a major source of fuel. Our energy-starved nation is scrambling to come up with alternatives to limited supplies of expensive oil and natural gas, and there's a growing buzz about switch grass even though most Americans would need a botanical guide to identify it.

Agribusiness giant Archer Daniels Midland Co., the world's largest producer of ethanol made from corn, this month unveiled plans to ramp up research into switch grass as another source to make ethanol and other biofuels for cars, homes and industry. In Washington, the Democrats soon to take over as heads of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees have put development of switch grass as a fuel source high on their priority list.

This is a "natural evolution of an industry that could be massive," said Patricia Woertz, chief executive of Decatur, Ill.-based ADM.

Also known as tall panic grass, switch grass doesn't look much like the grasses that cover today's lawns. It is a lanky plant, with stems up to 8 or 9 feet high and a root system just as deep, topped with lacy seed-bearing panicles. It grows in thick, jungle-like tangles.

It also is especially good at storing energy from the sun. "A living solar battery" is what Canadian switch-grass researcher Roger Samson calls it.

The U.S. Agriculture Department calls switch grass "perhaps our most valuable native grass." Oak Ridge National Laboratory has identified it as the model plant species for fuel, better than corn, which is all the rage now as the prime ingredient of ethanol. President Bush highlighted the energy potential of switch grass in his State of the Union address this year.

So, like a once-treasured toy rediscovered after years in the attic, switch grass is now the focus of talk about its revival--this time as a cash crop--on tens of millions of acres in the Midwest, South and Great Plains.

"This could very well be the future," said Stephen Gardner, one of dozens of southeastern Iowa farmers who for years have supplied switch grass for an electric generating experiment in Chillicothe that has shown encouraging results.

The notion of converting vegetation into fuel may seem odd in a nation that runs on oil, gas and coal. But fossil fuels themselves are the detritus of ancient plants, buried in the earth for millions of years.

They are also a finite resource, while fuel crops can be grown again and again. "Nature figured out long ago how to store chemical energy in plants," explained Robert Brown, director of the office of biorenewable programs at Iowa State University.



University of Illinois research

Energy can be squeezed from most any plant, and there are a lot of them under study these days as potential fuel sources. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is leading the way in research on giant miscanthus, a grass native to Asia. It can grow to 13 feet with bamboo-like stems ripe for burning.

The trick today is to target the plants that can be most efficiently grown and tapped for fuel. For now, the renewable fuel of choice in the U.S. is corn-based ethanol. It is essentially alcohol made from the starches in grain. Humans have been fermenting and drinking it since prehistoric times.

Corn is abundant, and it has a clout-heavy lobby of farmers and agribusiness promoting it for ethanol, which is largely blended with gasoline. But corn has limitations as a raw material for fuel. Divert a lot of corn to ethanol production and food prices are bound to rise. Corn also is a resource hog, requiring good soil and lots of water, fertilizer and herbicide, heightening environmental concerns.

One prominent researcher contends it takes more fossil energy to grow and transform corn starch into ethanol than the new fuel can yield, suggesting the process is a waste. Other experts disagree, but if there is an energy benefit to making ethanol this way, it is not huge.

The hope for switch grass is that it may bypass a lot of those problems while providing more bang for the energy buck in an ecologically friendly and low-maintenance way.

The explanation hearkens back to the prairies of old. Near-treeless vistas of undulating grass once stretched from the Gulf of Mexico up into Canada, providing a feasting ground for birds and other wildlife and packing the soils with nutrients. The grasses once covered 60 percent of what is now Illinois, which calls itself the Prairie State.

Ironically, the fertile soil of the prairie also was its undoing. The farmers who eventually chopped it away liked to boast that the prairie topsoil was so deep and rich that it could grease the axles of their wagons.

There were lots of different grasses in the Midwest prairie, but switch grass was one of the three predominant varieties. It didn't need much water, it adapted to a wide range of latitudes and soils, and it sucked in a lot of carbon dioxide from the air as fuel to grow on.

Prairie fires burned so hot that they would create their own cyclones, a testament to the energy that the grasses stored away.

Those are some of the traits that are kindling interest in switch grass as the nation scrambles to grow its way into energy self-sufficiency. David Bransby, a grasslands expert at Auburn University in Alabama, suggests a few more.



And it grows prodigiously

Bransby, who has studied switch grass for 20 years, says the plant grows prodigiously, yielding huge per-acre amounts of what the energy industry calls biomass--a term for living material that can be turned into fuel.

Switch grass requires no herbicides and little fertilizer, it can take hold on poor-quality land not suitable for most crops, and it is a perennial, meaning it doesn't have to be replanted like corn after each harvest. Stands of good-quality switch grass can last 10 years or more.

Switch grass also has ecological benefits, Bransby said. Its deep roots bind soil and block erosion. They also pump a lot of carbon into the ground, essentially recycling carbon-based greenhouse gases emitted when the plant is burned as fuel.

"If we really put our minds to it, we can use this to help replace the oil we import from the Middle East very easily in the next 20 years," Bransby said.

Unlike with corn, a cost-effective process to convert switch grass and other fibrous plant material into ethanol hasn't been perfected, though researchers say they're close. ADM's Woertz said biofuel producers right now are in a "chicken and egg" situation as they explore the potential of switch grass.

"How do you build massive facilities when you haven't grown the stuff yet, and then how do you grow the stuff if you haven't anywhere to process it?" she asked.

Some experts argue that switch grass would be an even better option as an ingredient for fuels other than ethanol, and the technology to make them exists now.

Samson, who runs a non-profit agricultural research institute in Quebec, said switch grass already is being used to make a low-quality natural gas substitute suitable for heating farm structures and small industrial buildings. Such biogas systems are in wide use in Germany and China, he said.

Switch grass also can be easily chopped and pressed into fuel pellets for burning in special furnaces to heat homes, Samson said. The slow-burning pellets heat for a price far less than natural gas, quickly paying for the cost of new heating equipment, he said.

"We think we're heading toward an agrarian industrial revolution," Samson predicted.

In Iowa, Gardner and more than 100 other growers have supplied switch grass for years to a federally sanctioned experiment that burns the grass alongside coal in a power plant in tiny Chillicothe, 80 miles southeast of Des Moines. Preliminary results indicate that switch grass burns almost as hot as the coal, and its presence in the fuel mix reduces sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide emissions.

The Iowa farmers reaped their switch grass from stands they had planted as part of the federal conservation reserve program, which pays farmers to take erosion-prone, low-quality cropland out of production.

Around the country, there are 36 million acres enrolled in the program, an area that if stitched together would cover every square inch of Illinois. Some already is planted in switch grass to help with erosion control.

In the prairies of old, nature mixed in switch grass with other plant varieties that kept each other in check. That wouldn't be the case if it is reintroduced as a fuel crop across wide stretches of the nation, and the prospect is troubling to some experts in invasive species.

Writing recently in the journal Science, a team of researchers led by S. Raghu of the Illinois Natural History Survey warned that wholesale plantings of switch grass, miscanthus or other grasses grown for fuel could have an ecological downside.

The grasses are attracting interest as biofuel crops because they grow rapidly, need little water and appear resistant to most pests and diseases. But those are also traits that help invasive species wreak havoc on ecosystems and agriculture.

The U.S. spends more than $100 billion annually trying to beat back the ravages of invasive species such as kudzu, so Raghu and his colleagues urged caution as the pressure to develop new crops for fuel intensifies.

"We're not saying every one of these is a nightmare waiting to happen, but we've made mistakes in past," he said. "There's no such thing as a free lunch."

- - -

Switch grass facts

- Switch grass was one of the dominant plant species of the American tallgrass prairie.

- The perennial's Latin name--panicum virgatum-- explains why it's called tall panic grass.

- Switch grass can grow 9 feet high, produces seeds the size of a grain of pepper, resists drought and flourishes in poor-quality soil.

- Switch grass test plots at Auburn University in Alabama have produced 1,150 gallons of ethanol per acre annually.
 

Powder Hound

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Oct 25, 1999
Location
Under a Bridge, Crestview, FL, USA
TDI
'00 Golf 4dr White 5sp, '02 Jettachero 5sp, Wife's '03 NB Platinum Gray auto(!)
I have only 1 question: why would a predominant species wreak environmental havoc when it is a native species anyway? I can see that for an asian grass, but a native plant?
 

tdisedanman

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Location
So Florida
TDI
Ex 2005 Passat, TDI and ex 2005.5 Jetta TDI
Wow! I can't wait for this to progress. I do believe there is a correlation to global warming and greenhouse gas emmissions. I also believe that some of the warming is from natural causes such as the earths rotational spin/axis changes. I am not a scientist and am not looking to start a whole string of technical whys and fors. If it happens, so be it. It seems that both sides always have their "evidence" and manage to do nothing more than confuse the issues rather than banding together and taking the least destructive path. To me, this investigation of a new bio fuel source is wonderful. And besides, nothing would give me more pleasure than the world being able to sustain itself on mostly bio fuel rather than on making the Mideast Countries wealthier! It seems now we can turn sun, sand and water into fuel. I wonder what the Mideast Countries will do with all their sand? Can they turn oil into water? LOL!
 

dasBlinkenlight

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Location
San Antonio, TX
TDI
2005 Jetta Wagon, Reflex Silver
Powder Hound said:
I have only 1 question: why would a predominant species wreak environmental havoc when it is a native species anyway? I can see that for an asian grass, but a native plant?
It's native, but it's not native the way it will be grown commercially. It is likely to be grown as a monoculture without any other grasses or perennials to "contaminate" the harvest. In contrast, natural prairie permacultures achieve equilibrium with a minimum of eight different species growing intermixed with one another. As the article points out, this keeps the growth of any individual species "in check." It also eliminates the need for fertilizer.

What may be needed here is a better harvesting technique....

-Ben
 

ALAND

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Location
Durham, NC
TDI
2005 Jetta Wagon, Spice Red, Tan Leather, 5sp.
What I want to know is why it would be so horrible for other native prairie plants to "contaminate" the switchgrass farms. This thing is a ginormous bunchgrass that I seriously doubt would be much harmed by a little competition with some other native herbs and grasses. It would exclude most woody species, and so what if there's a different grass in the mix, if it's just going to get burned anyway? Here's the way I think of it:

"Weeds" competing with the switchgrass reduces the biomass accumulation of switchgrass by x %, compared to monoculture switchgrass.

Those "weeds" do this by stealing space, water, mineral resources in the soil like phosphorus, nitrogen (unless they're legumes!).

But in the process of stealing all this stuff from your switchgrass, they accumulate biomass themselves. There is some efficiency with which they do accumulate this biomass, and if all of this non-switchgrass grass and herbage burns also, then the real loss to the farmer is less than x%.

Now, is this new number greater or less than what is would take to manufacture, transport, and apply all of the herbicide required to maintain the pure stand of switchgrass?

Finally, all of the application of poisons would reduce the populations and diversity of most of the soil bacterial and fungi which contribute greatly to the development of fertile soils and plant growth.

To me, it seems like the price for getting a monoculture is going to be very high. Why not just manage for switchgrass dominance (which is not likely to be very hard since it was a dominant plant before it was ripped out), and instead of researching how to wring every last pound of Panicum virgatum out of the field this season, figure out how harvest the most cellulose in a sustainable way from a switchgrass-dominated patch of prairie?

Of course this won't be feasible with genetically improved herbicide resistant Monsanto switchgrass. Then we'll need ag extension agents to help us grow switchgrass in nice little rows, the better to spray it! And you can send Monsanto a royalty check every harvest. Or if you grow the native stuff, you'd better hope that no Monsanto pollen accidently blows into your field. With other crops they've sent stealth inspectors to take samples from fields to check for their patented genes, to make sure no one saves seed without paying their dues.

I actually don't know if Agri-Bio-Tech is getting into this business, but I certainly would not be surprised if they couldn't leave well enough alone. This sort of tinkering is a more likely problem than native switchgrass being returned to it's former glory on the prairie.
 

ALAND

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Location
Durham, NC
TDI
2005 Jetta Wagon, Spice Red, Tan Leather, 5sp.
That's what I'm saying!
Bring back the prairie!
 

karlaudi

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Location
San Francisco Bay area
TDI
2002 VW Golf GLS 1.9TDi; 2012 Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TDi
Making Gas from Prairie Grasses (738 words)
December 7, 2006, All Things Considered
Sample | Purchase this transcript ROBERT SIEGEL, host: From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Robert Siegel.
MELISSA BLOCK, host:
And I'm Melissa Block.
The idea of burning grass to fuel your car or heat your home might seem a bit odd, but call grass a biofuel and suddenly it sounds plausible. Scientists are struggling to make biofuels that are cheap enough to compete with fossil fuels such as oil and coal. Growing anxiety over how fossil fuels warm the earth's climate...


The above is from the National Public Radio web site. You have to purchase a transcript. I heard most of the story while getting my daughter from school that day.

What I recall the story saying, was that an acre, or hectare, of prairie, with a diverse cross-section of [native] plants, produces the most energy from biomass than the same amount of land with just one single plant crop like switchgrass. They mentioned that as such, the diverse native plants actually remove more CO2 from the atmosphere, which is stored in the ground and roots, than is released when they are converted and burned as biofuel.

But don't take my word for it -- contact NPR ! :) ;)
 

cptmox

Veteran Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2001
Location
Villa Park, IL.
TDI
01 Jetta GLS, Silver 5-spd
MrMopar said:
the renewable fuel of choice in the U.S. is corn-based ethanol. It is essentially alcohol made from the starches in grain. Humans have been fermenting and drinking it since prehistoric times.
Reminds me of the "it's so simple, a caveman can do it" commercials.

I love those.
 
Top