Prius Outdoes Hummer in Environmental Damage

thermopylaetech

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Location
Accord NY USA
TDI
2005 Jetta Variant TDi/PD
Yeah, while it is a nice sentiment, it is based on some seriously outdated enviromental data and some skewed interpretations.

Not that it changes how I feel about the prius as just another good shot. Diesel is still king of renewable biofuel and low emmissions.
 

BioDiesel

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2001
Location
CT
TDI
'98 Jetta
I've heard similar analysis claiming the energy used to make a vehicle is far more than the vehicle consumes during it's lifetime. Hence M-B's that last 300K+ are preferred. Ok, but I'm sure it's complicated to estimate accurately.

And if, as the 'Dust to Dust' analysis states, the Prius averages $3.25 / mile over 100,000 mile lifetime, thats a total 'cost' of $325,000!
Subtracting $25,000 for fuel leaves a $300,000 'production cost'.

So how can Toyota sell a car that 'costs' $300,00 to make?
Something doesn't add up. How can the combined material and energy and labor costs be higher than $20,000?
 

nortones2

Veteran Member
Joined
May 10, 2000
Location
High Peak, UK
TDI
Formerly Passat 1.9 110hp
As you infer Biodiesel, there is something dodgy in the basic assumptions like the ratio of resource needed to build and to run a vehicle, not to mention the 300,000 assumed life of the Hummer compared with the 100,000 assigned max to the Prius. Some deconstruction of the dodgy thesis starts here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2007/06/04/EDGI7Q63U01.DTL

The lunar landscape retraction: http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages...ews.html?in_article_id=417227&in_page_id=1770

Rocky Mountain Institute looked at dust to dust claims:https://www.rmi.org/images/PDFs/Transportation/T07-01_DustToDust.pdf

Toyota: http://www.toyota.com/html/dyncon/2007/september/hummervprius.html

There's more here: http://priuschat.com/index.php?showtopic=31938&st=20
which is my source for the counter arguments.
 
Top