Did you sit in that back seat? I had a 2011 Malibu which was smaller than the Passat. Then GM made it even smaller in 2013 for Epsilon II. My sister has a 2016 Regal. Any mid-sized car would be fine if I wasn't 6'4" and needed the front seat all the way back.I did a ton of research when I was comparing all of the cars. The rear seat room in the Malibu is almost identical to the Passat. Legroom in the Passat is 39.1 inches, while the Malibu is 38.1. Headroom in the Passat is 37.8 inches and 37.5 inches in the in the Malibu. That's 97.5% and 99.2% respectively.
I really appreciate the range of my Passat TDI. The farthest way from home I've driven it away is less than half a tank. However, I averaged filling up every 10 calendar days, 600-650 miles. Between work, errands, carting kids my time is valuable. I have owned vehicles with 250 mile tank ranges and hated stopping every 3-4 days. If I can get through 1 full week of commuting and school/weekend activities with my new car, I'm happy.The killer difference for me was the Passat's 18.5 gallon fuel tank versus the 13.0 gallon fuel tank of the Malibu. Coupled with far less mileage, that's a significant range difference.
On top of that, you think VW maintenance costs are expensive!The 328d doesn't compare to the Passat in size, and the E250 Bluetec, while being a very nice car, is basically double the price of the Passat TDI, starting at $53,000 and having numerous additional options available.
I've heard good reports on both, and to be honest, I think these premium vehicles with high price tags are going to be the only way to get diesel engines in the future. High profit margins on the luxury brand with lots of options are the only way to disguise the ever-increasing costs of emissions systems and compliance.
Yes I did. Malibu was redesigned for 2016. It's larger than it was before.Did you sit in that back seat? I had a 2011 Malibu which was smaller than the Passat. Then GM made it even smaller in 2013 for Epsilon II.
I resemble that remark!!! (Old joke, I think from the Three Stooges???)I skimmed the previous posts and did not see anyone consider a TSI Passat as a replacement.
The Accord and Mazda are two that I have looked at, but they don't have the size of the Passat.
The comments about the Avalon made me chuckle. My wife asked me how about Toyota, I said they were for old people. She reminded me that I'm almost 50!
None of the gas cars are going to give me the consistent 48-52 MPG that I get with the Passat.
When factoring cabin size, road handling etc the Passat comes out on top for me.
Mazda's warranty is appealing given I drive 30,000 miles per year.
Interested in all your opinions as to why or why not a TSI Passat.
I agree. Add to the mix that those of us who bought the car when it came out that the competition has improved beyond where the Passat was when it launched which at the time was very competitive. The 6, Fusion, new Malibu and Sonata all drive really well. I guess people on here forget that the TDI is just a basic commuter/family car. It has not and never will be a sports car, it is just a decent driving car that gets great mpgs (nothing wrong with that). All variations on the mid-size commuter car theme. For me it comes down to space (rear space mostly behind my tall self), the best mpgs and as I wanted something different for a powertrain (just like when I went with the TDI) my choice is a Sonata plug in hybrid. They are a steal if you can find them, $39.8k MSRP down to $24k due to Hyundai dealer discount, rebates and Federal/State rebates. Closing the deal this afternoon, will be driving it by the weekend. Also, if I park my TDI until at least 12/1 and drive basically only one more tank I will just be under the mileage threshold to get another $400+ back on the TDI. Helps offset keeping insurance on it until the buyback and I still can use it for some commutes as they finish paving roads or for the first snow driving day of the year when people drive like idiots. The plug in portion will cost me more to run than if it was just a hybrid (electricity isn't cheap in MA, currently around $0.19 - $0.22 per kwh) but this is actually several thousand cheaper due to discounts. If RUG goes up even just $0.70 per gallon, it becomes a wash. Even if it stays stagnant, on paper it will cost just under $100 more per year (vs the Sonata hybrid) to run a good portion of my mileage silently. If my company finally puts in charging stations, even better.I resemble that remark!!! (Old joke, I think from the Three Stooges???)
The newer Avalon is remarkably different than previous models...
As to the Accord, in what area did that not have the size of the Passat? I bought a '16 Accord and it's practically identical to the Passat in length, width, height, weight, trunk space, fuel tank, etc. The trunk is 15.8cubic feet in the Accord and 15.9 in the Passat, and the fuel tank is 17.3 in the Accord and 18.5 in the Passat. The rest is pretty identical.The Accord and Mazda are two that I have looked at, but they don't have the size of the Passat.
Absolutely. One thing that has been validated for me is the advice to sit in as many cars as possible to see what works. Numbers on a web page or video reviews by people who are a completely different body type only tell a part of the story. Also, mfgs don't use the same standards when measuring interior specs like leg room so you really can't compare. Some measure with the seat all the way forward or all the way back. At the very least, add the 2 numbers together to see what the total space is but you really need to try them out to really know.Interesting: Avalon Hybrid, smaller trunk than NMS. However, since it's more square/deeper, I was able to get 3 large Costco Kirkland soft-side suitcases to fit very nicely, something I coulnd never do with the NMS. So...sometimes it's about the dimensions, not simply the volume!
At 6'4", the rear seat when sitting behind me has less legroom than the Passat. With three kids who inherited, the frequent 1.5 hour trips we do, I consider their comfort to an extent.As to the Accord, in what area did that not have the size of the Passat? I bought a '16 Accord and it's practically identical to the Passat in length, width, height, weight, trunk space, fuel tank, etc. The trunk is 15.8cubic feet in the Accord and 15.9 in the Passat, and the fuel tank is 17.3 in the Accord and 18.5 in the Passat. The rest is pretty identical.
I didn't go with a Passat because 1). I'm disappointed in VW and how this was handled 2). I'm really mad about the 10 week disqualification window in which you could not total a VW that I fell into...so I don't want to give VW any more of my money, and 3). It would be hard to drive around essentially the SAME car, but get only ~70% of the mileage I had before. At least by going with a different make/model, it helps that mileage loss transition.
I looked this up and it seems the Passat has 39.1 inches of legroom and the Accord has 38.5 The Passat has 37.8 inches of headroom, while the Accord has 37.5. That's a very small difference, but it is a difference.At 6'4", the rear seat when sitting behind me has less legroom than the Passat.
Oh yes, this I know. I miss my 700-800 mile fillips. My Accord is right around 500.Accord fuel tank is only slightly smaller than the Passat, but going from TDI to Gas makes a huge difference, will for the Passat mind you. I drive 750 to 800 miles per week, so love the range an infrequent fills of the TDI Passat.
Yeah, I really do like it. It has a few things I don't love, but they are minor. Like fact that passenger front seat doesn't have height adjustment.Having said all that, I like the Accords. Are you happy with it.
Well, my Accord only has 1500 miles on it, so no maintenance yet. It was less costly for insurance. And thus far with gasoline, getting around 32MPG, compared to the 40 on average that I got with the Passat, my Accord is coming me about 6.9c per mile, and my Passat was 7.9c. But the Passat was over 52k miles, only time will tell on the Honda. Overall, the required maintenance appears much less on the Honda. I expect to save quite a bit of money on long term maintenance. But my Passat was trouble free over 52k, so outside of maintenance I don't really have anything to compare to.How has the Accord operating cost been compared to VW? As in maintenance etc.
I don't love the Avalon, couldn't see myself in one, but I have to give you credit for the above. Among many long time VW fans the NMS Passat isn't a favorite.It's hardly as if an NMS Passat is some sort of young person's "sporty" car.
That's because the Jetta sedan is larger for the US market, whereas the wagon is based on the Golf.3) Drove the VW Alltrack - Nice car, good power and ride. Seems smaller in the back than my 2016 Jetta Sport, which doesn't make sense.
If the Alltrack is too small, the Golf is a shorter Alltrack.Currently waiting for the 2017 CRV to come out. She will also try a 2017 Golf, Hyundai Tucson, and ???
Oh, I agree with you, but my wife uses "alternative logic" when it comes to making decisions!If the Alltrack is too small, the Golf is a shorter Alltrack.
Exactly why I bought a used Q5. Something to tide me over until the new Tiguan and/or Atlas are released. I want to give both a little time after release to get the bugs out, and hopefully get either a TDI or hybrid powerplant. The Q5 is a little larger than the Tiguan, which was my major issue with the 11 Tiguan I used to own. I think the 2018 Tiguan will be just right for me, and I expect it to have the latest technology. The current Tiguan is almost an embarrassment with its lack of bells and whistles.4) Drove a 2017 Tiguan - nice solid car, but lacking technology.