I'm under the impression that the variable compression is intended to increase low-load efficiency, while also allowing more boost to be crammed in at high-load.
However... what was wrong with approaches like Mazda's wide-authority VVT approach to this (Atkinsonizing, so expansion is maintained through the compression loss, although effective displacement is not), and just using some more displacement? Seems like the simpler approach that's more durable, and the turbocharging is all about improving part-load efficiency, which Atkinsonization can do too. Granted, looks like this engine also has some sort of VVT authority to Atkinsonize, but...