Nano-sized Ultrafine Particles may contribute to Heart Disease

pogo

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2002
Location
Denville, NJ
TDI
Golf/02/5spd 230K Passat SE/12/DSG 50K
from GreenCarCongress.com. Its only one study, but still, I wonder if the new particulate filters will address particles this size.


Study Suggests Unregulated Nano-sized Ultrafine Particles May Be Most Damaging Component of Air Pollution for Heart Disease

18 January 2008

Representative histological photomicrographs. Red staining in sections of the aorta represents lipid and macrophage content, which are part of the atherosclerotic plaque development. Exposure to ultrafine particles shows highest degree of plaques. Click to enlarge. A new study indicates that ultrafine particles—particles of less than 0.18 micrometers—from vehicle emissions may be the most damaging components of air pollution in triggering plaque buildup in the arteries, which can lead to heart attack and stroke. The findings appear in an open access article in the 17 January online edition of the journal Circulation Research.
A team from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); the University of Southern California; the University of California, Irvine; and Michigan State University contributed to the research, which was led by Dr. Andre Nel, UCLA’s chief of nanomedicine. The study was primarily funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
It appears that the smallest air pollutant particles, which are the most abundant in an urban environment, are the most toxic. This is the first study that demonstrates the ability of nano-sized air pollutants to promote atherosclerosis in an animal model.
—Dr. Jesus Araujo, first author and assistant professor of medicine and director of environmental cardiology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA​
The EPA currently regulates fine particles at 2.5 micrometers, but doesn’t monitor particles in the nano- or ultrafine range. These particles are too small to capture in a filter, so new technology must be developed to track their contribution to adverse health effects.
We hope our findings offer insight into the impact of nano-sized air pollutant particles and help explore ways for stricter air quality regulatory guidelines.
—Andre Nel​
The UCLA research team previously reported that diesel exhaust particles interact with artery-clogging fats in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to activate genes that cause the blood-vessel inflammation that can lead to heart disease. (Earlier post.)
In the current study, researchers exposed mice with high cholesterol to one of two sizes of air pollutant particles from downtown Los Angeles freeway emissions and compared them with mice that received filtered air that contained very few particles.
The study, conducted over a five-week period, required a complex exposure design that was developed by teams led by Dr. Michael Kleinman, professor of community and environmental medicine at UC Irvine, and Dr. Constantinos Sioutas, professor of civil and environmental engineering at USC.
Researchers found that mice exposed to ultrafine particles exhibited 55% greater atherosclerotic-plaque development than animals breathing filtered air and 25% greater plaque development than mice exposed to fine-sized particles.
Pollutant particles are coated in chemicals sensitive to free radicals, which cause the cell and tissue oxidation. Oxidation leads to the inflammation that causes clogged arteries. Samples from polluted air revealed that ultrafine particles have a larger concentration of these chemicals and a larger surface area where these chemicals thrive, compared with larger particles, Sioutas noted.
Ultrafine particles may deliver a much higher effective dose of injurious components, compared with larger pollutant particles.
—Andre Nel​
Scientists also identified a key mechanism behind how these air pollutants are able to affect the atherosclerotic process. Using a test developed by Dr. Mohamad Navab, study co-author and a UCLA professor of medicine, researchers found that exposure to air pollutant particles significantly decreased the anti-inflammatory protective properties of HDL cholesterol.
To explore if air particle exposure caused oxidative stress throughout the body—which is an early process triggering the inflammation that causes clogged arteries—researchers checked for an increase in genes that would have been activated to combat this inflammatory progression.
They found greater levels of gene activation in mice exposed to ultrafine particles, compared to the other groups. The next step will be to develop a biomarker that could enable physicians to assess the degree of cardiovascular damage caused by air pollutants or measure the level of risk encountered by an exposed person.
Previous studies assessing the cardiovascular impact of air pollution have taken place over longer periods of exposure time, such as five to six months. The current study demonstrated that ill effects can occur more quickly, in just five weeks.
The research team included investigators from the fields of nanomedicine, cardiology and genetics. Additional co-authors included Berenice Barajas, Xuping Wang, Brian J. Bennett and Ke Wei Gong of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and Jack Harkema from the department of pathobiology and diagnostic investigation at Michigan State University.
Additional grant support was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Resources
 

Waldek Walrus

Veteran Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Location
Central Pennsylvania
TDI
2006 Beetle TDI
Nano-Particles

My (very limited) understanding is that these particles mainly come from the combustion in **gassers** and are unregulated because they are not seen, unlike diesel 'soot.' This may eventually force a more balanced approach to regulations (say I in vain hope) as filters to trap it will shut off all vehicles, not just diesels.
 

wxman

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 26, 1999
Location
East TN, USA
TDI
Other Diesel
Doug - I agree. If regulators are really serious about PM emssions, they need to use particle NUMBER as an emission metric, not just mass. That would likely force gassers to use particulate filters.

pogo - I've commented a few times on this on GCC under a different username. To answer your question, yes DPFs are effective across the entire particle size distribution range:


(ftp://ftp.arb.ca.gov/carbis/cc/techsem/final_presentations/hofbauer_ccengines.pdf)
 

pogo

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2002
Location
Denville, NJ
TDI
Golf/02/5spd 230K Passat SE/12/DSG 50K
The study cites .18 micro meter size particles as being dangerous. That's 18 nanometer, right?

The exhaust is cleaner than the intake air, with respect to 18 nanmoter particles, after passing through the filter cited in the graph. The more you drive, the cleaner the air. Cool.

Will the new diesels have this sort of filter?
 

wxman

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 26, 1999
Location
East TN, USA
TDI
Other Diesel
pogo said:
The study cites .18 micro meter size particles as being dangerous. That's 18 nanometer, right?
Actually, that's 180 nm (there are 1,000 nm in a micrometer). It appears from the graph that the DPF is most effective around 100 nm (i.e., PM0.1).

Will the new diesels have this sort of filter?
The graphic says Wall Flow Filter. I believe that's what is being/will be used in light-duty diesel vehicles.

Engineers?
 

GoFaster

Moderator at Large
Joined
Jun 16, 1999
Location
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI
Pretty sure that's what they are calling it.

Looks like at the 180 nm size range, the particle count in the exhaust is about the same as that in the intake air ...
 
Top