Mine is at 113,000 miles. Unless they leak or lose gas, I am not changing shocks/struts mounting hardware till 200,000 miles. As people have noted, the mounting hardware tends to give out probably before the shocks and struts. Some things get under and sometimes over used, due to the economics of changing everything @ the same time. Since the labor charge is the same when you do it all at the same time, the other parts that would you would change also, are just a tad more.JettaDrvr said:My 2000 Jetta has the original shocks and struts w/130,000 miles. Typically how long do the factory shocks and struts last?
This was my scenario on my '00 Jetta. However, I did the replacement at 12k miles. What an improvement (with the TCs) !!VATechTDI said:Mine lasted 40,000 miles. I replaced them with Bilstein (TC I believe?) and I'm now at 200,000 miles and they're still working fine. Still on original springs.
JettaDrvr said:Speaking of TCs, I was looking at them, and have done alot of reading about Bilsteins. I read a few posts where people werent happy with them, but they didnt go into any detail as to what the problem was.
It might be an interesting discussion, but some folks go by whether or not they like the feel in comparison to the stock struts and shocks. Bilstein TC's (as well as the HD's) are decidedly stiffer than stock. There are a host of other considerations. So unless we want to cover some high points, one way to help decide is to go to a GTG and ask folks that have different shocks and struts how they like them and ask for a demo. Most folks have had the stock struts and shocks, so that is usually a normal point of departure for comparison.JettaDrvr said:Speaking of TCs, I was looking at them, and have done alot of reading about Bilsteins. I read a few posts where people werent happy with them, but they didnt go into any detail as to what the problem was. Are they too stiff or something?
TCs are classified as an OEM replacement. They are 10 or 15% stiffer than original parts. If you want to go stiffer yet, look at the Bilstein HDs.JettaDrvr said:Speaking of TCs, I was looking at them, and have done alot of reading about Bilsteins. I read a few posts where people werent happy with them, but they didnt go into any detail as to what the problem was. Are they too stiff or something?
Has anyone seen a correlation to broken springs and removed rock guards on the rear swingarm?BobnOH said:the springs should last indefinitely unless they delaminate or break
Sip'n Diesel said:I don't want to thread hijack, but...
would anyone like to comment on the longevity of their TCs?
I have seen some older threads about these and this seems to be a pretty controversial subject, so I understand if this is the wrong thread
for the past 30k miles I've been trying to decide between Bilstein TCs versus Koni Yellows (or maybe STR.Ts)
right now I'm leaning towards buying some Konis. HDs and FSDs are above my price range (for now) and this car is a daily driver
In addition to seal leaks and physical damage, actually yes; a shock dyno test. It is just on the consumer level, not many know much about it. If you do a search on this web site and/or www.vortex.com Peter Pyce's treastise is a fascinating read. (Peter is/was a member like you or I.)Doug Huffman said:Is there an objective test for end of life?
Thanks for a good post ruking. This is true for a good number of things.But really its major obstacle is perception and has NOTHING to do with its real quality.
The rods are not that bad hire of corse some cars just magically disappear in the manny pot holes but my struts are still ok at 100k it my aliment that gets shot all the time.Nico3d3 said:I have the Bilstein TC on my car and they are doing a good job as far as I know. New shocks absorber coupled with new rear sway bar & lower control arm bushing gave me a brand new ride. I also had to change both front coil spring because one of them was broken and they only sell it in pair. That's what you get when are driving on the crappy road of Quebec.