Why in the world would anybody want to keep one of these after reading these posts?
I worry for the future of the country, when folks think everything posted on the internet is the "truth", and do not apply reasonable effort to verify and place into context.
I am not saying anyone is lying, but individual samples do not tell the whole story.
but to answer the thread and your question,
I have registered for the fix, and would be happy to go early.
my dpf is a little cracked, and the fix we have hints of includes a new NOX cat. for my 2009, the existing cat is welded to the DPF. so they would reasonably have to include an intact DPF as part of the fix for my car.
I like the car, and it seems to be working well otherwise. There are a few items that need repair and replacement, but that is not unexpected at 184,000 miles. It runs well, and I still want to get my full value out of the lifetime Sat radio plan I signed up for, and that they no longer offer.
I still want to put another couple years of camping in with the car, using the roof top tent which fits well attached to the roof rack. it also does well filled with ski equipment driving all over in the winter.
Truth be told, with 184,000 miles on the car, it does not owe me anything, as far as it goes, every additional mile is a bonus.
if it died tomorrow, and I got nothing out of it, I would not feel that i was cheated.
I do not support the way VW cheated the emissions control checks, but even with that, the car emits a lot less than earlier TDIs and quite a few other vehicles on the road. It is a great outcome of the enforcement to slap the company hard enough to make automakers think twice about cheating, apply an improvement to the emissions treatment system, make compensating investments, and move on. Including us vehicle owners in the settlement also is great. The damage to vehicle value and reputation is real, and the compensation seems reasonable to me.
from an economic and environmental point of view, it does not make sense to me that these cars will not be "fixed" the sunk cost of making the vehicle (in environmental impact and $$) would be wasted if the vehicles are not maintained on the road.
the average age of a car in the US is 11 and a half years.
out of almost half a million vehicles, my guess is that well over half will get a fix one way or the other, and remain on the road for the next ten years.
for the buy backs, and for each of us that own one, it is an individual cost-benefit decision. half a million of them.
why would anyone think the same answer would apply to all of them?