HBarlow
Veteran Member
And have a lot of fun driving either one. An appliance . . . not much fun to drive.Exactly! For the price of that appliance one could get an X5 AND a 5 series, for example.
And have a lot of fun driving either one. An appliance . . . not much fun to drive.Exactly! For the price of that appliance one could get an X5 AND a 5 series, for example.
So you're looking at a C class? LOL.As I said, there's absolutely no desire to drive an appliance, Tesla S or any other model/brand. To each, their own.
I suppose you could choose a lesser-optioned model. $135K is fully equipped with the biggest battery, the fanciest wheels, all of the electronic driving aids, etc. The Model S starts at $66K, and the Model 3 will start at $35K.Neither any electrical appliance I've ever purchased, nor, I expect, my ass, would be priced anywhere near $135,000. Neither would any car I would ever buy, even if the price were cut in half. Two-thirds might catch my interest.
Test drive reports of the Model S suggest that it's extremely fun to drive. It's certainly fast--sub-3-second 0-60 times beat just about anything else on the road, no matter what the power source. And the low-end torque of an electric motor can make any diesel look positively wimpy.An appliance . . . not much fun to drive.
Such an informative article. My favorite part was when they provided detailed analysis of the crash.Ah, the Tesla------http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-05/tesla-%E2%80%98world%E2%80%99s-safest-car%E2%80%99-explodes-bomb
If I'm going to spend $135k, it's going to be on a second home. I can buy 3-4 cars that I'm comfortable owning for that amount. I'm not saying that electric vehicles don't have a place and I will consider a bolt or volt as my next car. My only reluctance is still range. The kids are currently 2 hours or fifteen hours away.Test drive reports of the Model S suggest that it's extremely fun to drive. It's certainly fast--sub-3-second 0-60 times beat just about anything else on the road, no matter what the power source. And the low-end torque of an electric motor can make any diesel look positively wimpy.
I don't have one, and almost certainly never will--if I'm going to spend $135k on a vehicle, it's going to have wings. But to lump the Model S in with things like the Volt and the Prius is simply ignorant.
Dan,Test drive reports of the Model S suggest that it's extremely fun to drive. It's certainly fast--sub-3-second 0-60 times beat just about anything else on the road, no matter what the power source. And the low-end torque of an electric motor can make any diesel look positively wimpy.
I don't have one, and almost certainly never will--if I'm going to spend $135k on a vehicle, it's going to have wings. But to lump the Model S in with things like the Volt and the Prius is simply ignorant.
So much yes! Ive always wanted one.The replacement has landed!
![]()
Edited - Downsized per halfast's request.
Also, not all Model S's cost $120k+. I DO get reactions from most people assuming that is what mine cost though. Little do they know I got it for half the price new. lol. Not cheap by any means, but I too, cannot afford, nor can I see myself spending $120k on a car.If I'm going to spend $135k, it's going to be on a second home. I can buy 3-4 cars that I'm comfortable owning for that amount. I'm not saying that electric vehicles don't have a place and I will consider a bolt or volt as my next car. My only reluctance is still range. The kids are currently 2 hours or fifteen hours away.
If you actually did drive one you would quickly see how ridiculous referring to them as an electrical appliance really is.As I said, there's absolutely no desire to drive an appliance, Tesla S or any other model/brand. To each, their own.
It looks great. Congratulations. I haven't driven or even ridden in one but I understand the performance potential of the new Mustang, Camaro, and Dodge Charger is scary.I got this one August 2015, prior to news. Not really a replacement, driving my wife's Mazda 3, it gets around 36mpgso the fuel costs it's about identical with the TDi.
![]()
If you actually did drive one you would quickly see how ridiculous referring to them as an electrical appliance really is.
Take lots of cash if you do because you'll want one
My 71 year old brother-in-law bought a new SS Camero last year. Scary fast but you can't see out of the thing. I drove it all over San Jose last time I was there and it is nice. Strangely, GM cheapened out the door panels (plastic) on a $45K car. Go figure. I haven't driven this vintage of Mustang but have owned 5 or so since 1988 (GT's, V6's, convertibles, etc).It looks great. Congratulations. I haven't driven or even ridden in one but I understand the performance potential of the new Mustang, Camaro, and Dodge Charger is scary.
I've always been a fan of the Mazda Miata MX5, keeps a lower profile and good fuel efficiency, reliability and affordable.I'm at a loss as to what I will buy once my Passat is back in the hands of its creator. I am looking at used pickups (expensive!), the Volt (used - not sure why I am doing this), BMW M3 & M4 roadsters, and some sporty convertibles. I guess I'm the kind of old guy that just can't make up my mind but I can't have them all.
Congratulations. That's a nice car/suv.I'm buying a CPO 2014 Audi A7 3.0T in Pennsylvania. Got picked up by the transporter yesterday.
I've driven a couple of Miata's recently and find them a fun ride, but a bit on the small side. They remind me of my old MGB roadster, size wise. The BMW M3 and M4 are a bit larger (but not by a whole lot).I admire the Mazda Miata as well as the Mustangs, Camaros, and Challengers but my old and worn knees don't share my admiration. Those cars are low!
My husband's wagon was hit last year and while it was in the shop we rented a Mustang which we had to turn in because of a bad tire and got a Camaro. You can't see a darn thing out of the Camaro, we hated it. Loved the Mustang though. The last used car we bought was a 3 or 4 year old Passat TDI wagon, 6 months after we bought it the transmission went. Won't buy used again.My 71 year old brother-in-law bought a new SS Camero last year. Scary fast but you can't see out of the thing. I drove it all over San Jose last time I was there and it is nice. Strangely, GM cheapened out the door panels (plastic) on a $45K car. Go figure. I haven't driven this vintage of Mustang but have owned 5 or so since 1988 (GT's, V6's, convertibles, etc).
My favorite was our 1989 5.0 GT Convertible (25th year Anniversary Edition) which my 16 year old daughter took one morning without clearing it with me and spun it around on an icy bridge going to school on morning when I was out of town. Totaled it.
I'm at a loss as to what I will buy once my Passat is back in the hands of its creator. I am looking at used pickups (expensive!), the Volt (used - not sure why I am doing this), BMW M3 & M4 roadsters, and some sporty convertibles. I guess I'm the kind of old guy that just can't make up my mind but I can't have them all.
Wow ! sounds awesome, if I can convince the wife to ditch our plans for an SUV ! Sounds like a much more reasonable ride for me. I did test drive a KIA Optima but the headroom and backseat were dealbreakers. Nice drive though.I would try the Sonata Hybrid if you haven't yet looked at it. I have a 2016 Limited with Ultimate package - it was the most comparable to my SEL Premium, except with bells and whistles. MPG is averaging 43+, slightly higher than my TDI. I do like it's much quieter drive, smooth ride, and overall comfort, but it's not as sporting to drive. Only 2 gripes; fuel tank is smaller, so only seeing mid-600 mile range before having to fill-up, and no spare tire since the hybrid battery occupies that space. While the trunk size is smaller, it's only about 3" shallower than normal, and not oddly shaped, making it fully usable. I drove the new 2017 Accord Hybrid and frankly wasn't impressed. Hyundai won me over due it's longer warranties, huge back seat, the 6-speed auto (vs CVT in all other hybrids), ability to drive 2-4 miles on battery alone, and finally the great deal I got.