compu_85
Gadget Guy
See my current signature...
Yes and no. The one fire reported that is took an estimated 3000 gallons of water (IIRC) but that particular station house was not equipped with foam supression system. They need to smoother the fire and adding water to a melting lithium fire just increases the reaction. It's forcing many fire departments and businesses that have their own first repsonders to evaluate their equipment. They also have the rare circumstance that the battery system is arcing.Speaking of burning down the road... Have you heard about putting out a fire in an electric vehicle? It takes approximately 30,000 gallons of water to extinguish and cool down a Tesla, unlike a internal combusted vehicle that takes maybe 1000 gallons.
Not sure that a Model Y can tow a 3500 pound trailer for 200 miles at 85 mph. Even my truck drops from mid20s to mid teens when towing..... like you said... 'There are use cases which favor one or the other for sure.'
If the Bolt didn't fit your needs then try a Model Y or the Mach-E. The Model Y can tow 3500lbs and easily travel ~200 miles at 85mph then recharge enough for another ~200 miles in ~20 minutes. Of course a new Y is going to be more expensive than a used TDI but the only way to get used cars is to build new ones. Would have been nice if were had done what we're doing now ~15 years ago. Then there would be all sorts of great used EV options out there....
FMLYESSSSSSSSSSSSS
Todays EVs have little to no metallic lithium in the battery pack. The lithium is in the form of salts that do not react with water in the way that metallic lithium does. Ideally, a fire involving an EV would be allowed to burn itself out. Since that is impractical in many/most instances, the use of large volumes of water is recommended. At some point fire departments will probably be equipped with dumpster like bins that the vehicle can be hoisted into and submerged in sand, water, etc.Yes and no. The one fire reported that is took an estimated 3000 gallons of water (IIRC) but that particular station house was not equipped with foam supression system. They need to smoother the fire and adding water to a melting lithium fire just increases the reaction. It's forcing many fire departments and businesses that have their own first repsonders to evaluate their equipment. They also have the rare circumstance that the battery system is arcing.
Yes again I agree with what you are saying, but that doesn't help one bit TODAY for used car shoppers.Would have been nice if were had done what we're doing now ~15 years ago. Then there would be all sorts of great used EV options out there....
Vehicles without turbos should be banned..... that is all.All without getting a turbo involved.
My point is let's not make the same mistake today we did 15 years ago. We get good affordable used EVs tomorrow by buying new ones today. Garbage today, Garbage tomorrow... let's stop manufacturing garbage today.Yes again I agree with what you are saying, but that doesn't help one bit TODAY for used car shoppers.
You just have to be the person willing to take the hit on value by buying it new. Someone else will come along and reap the benefits.My point is let's not make the same mistake today we did 15 years ago. We get good affordable used EVs tomorrow by buying new ones today. Garbage today, Garbage tomorrow... let's stop manufacturing garbage today.
The skyactiv motors are much nicer than the older '01-13 mzr. Better torque power and economy. On cold start they almost sound like a diesel, which makes some sense given their 13:1 compression ratio. 2014 2016 is the sweet spot iirc for picking up an affordable 3. Earlier the engines suck like moz said. Later the styling gets more.. modern.The Mazda 3s used to be quite attractive vehicles, imo. When I looked at the latest generation a few weeks ago I was disappointed. Maybe the driving dynamics are still great, but it looked bulbous and unappealing. That's one area where VW really nailed it. All of the Golfs have what I would call timeless good design.
omg 35 grandFML
1984 Volkswagen GTI for sale #2413854 - Hemmings Motor News
Classic 1984 Volkswagen GTI for sale #2413854 $34,500. Norwalk, Connecticut. 1984 Volkswagen GTI, 100% original and untouched from new with just 77,000 originawww.hemmings.com
i wish they were cheaper in my areaRegarding the post above my answer is Mk4 R32.
A new Camry/Accord is already quicker than most of the 70's muscle cars. I imagine there will always be greater nostalgia for classic Mustangs, Camaros, Roadrunners, etc. in this country. A mk1 or mk2 gti appeals to my nostalgia largely because that's what half the cars in my high school parking lot were back in the day.Just wait a few years, in 2027 when every performance car is a battery laden behemoth with 800 foot pounds of torque and a 0-60 time of 3 seconds... What do you think is going to appeal to people's nostalgia more? A heavy torquey 1970's musclecar? OR a nimble little 84 GTI?