Variations in On-Board MPG calculations
sometimes my average mpg is 41...sometimes it's 52
The computers
LIE
.
Is it my engine? My computer? My fuel? Or is this normal?
Unfortunately, it is something called Integral Calculus. Think of it this way, When you Fill up your vehicle with fuel, How much fuel do you dump in ,and over what distance is it? (Pardon me I am in the frosty North so for me all the math is easier? in metric)
IF you travel 800 Kms and then fill up again (480 mi), and have filled in 40 Litres (10.5 Gallons) then your average MPG is (Canadians use inverse L per 100 km) 5.0 L / 100 km or 48 MPGs(approx).
Now if you slice that into 500 slices, and then travel say 50 Kms in one direction (For example East), then take the same route, but now are facing in the opposite direction (Travelling Westbouund), you now are going to be pushing against the prevailing winds in N.America and your MPGs will drop down as it burns perhaps 5% more fuel (or going uphill), this then is why the variation in the MPGs one way and then the other.
When going uphill, you will generally burn more fuel, than downhill, so your mileage may vary, however, if you add all of those 500 slices back up, on par, you will get the same reading with pen and paper.
You are welcome
PS. One other part I forgot to mention is the use of the Difference in Pressure between the fuel volume going into the Fuel Pump, and the fuel volume going back into the return line back to the fuel tank. Depending on how accurate the two sensor(s) are, this will impact the accuracy of the MPG calculator in the dash, since it is a
difference in the two values (IN-Out over the time(seconds?) that give the number in mL compensated for by temperature. This difference yields the fuel consumption at any given moment.
Just for fun , hit reset one day, while stopped at a long stoplight. See how much fuel is being consumed over what distance? If you are stopped the distance traveled is zero point zero tenths of a mile (km) , so the calculator *should* approach 0 MPG, or go to 99 L /100 km then read 'over-range' or similar since it cannot divide by zero, a mathematical impossibility.