Help me understand my engine map (1.9L ALH) (Or I intend to do stupid things)

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
I've got a cable in the mail and poor judgement so I'll be attempting to flash my ECU soon. In preparation I have been looking at an ECU dump and the maps in it trying to understand it. I'm starting this thread so that you can share in my stupidity. Obviously this is for the 1.9L ALH engine, and 02-03s can be flashed via a cable. I grabbed the ECU off of the internets (www.chiptuning.org, stock ECU forum) - when I get my cable I'll dump my ECU and compare it for any discrepancies.

If you want to do some reading here's a previous similar thread http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=279207
a primer on the maps
https://sites.google.com/site/vagecumap/diesel-engine-control
Vag EDC15P Suite (similar to WinOLS but for TDIs specifically)
http://trionic.mobixs.eu/
And I'll post a link to an ECU dump later - for some reason I can't seem to upload zips right now.

So the ECU uses tables called maps to look at the state of the engine and then vary a couple things. Primarily: Fuel quantity (controlled by the fuel pump voltage map, more correctly thought of as length of injection event), fuel timing (how many degrees BTDC or ATDC does the injection start), Boost pressure. It can also sense the fuel quantity, fuel timing, boost pressure, mass air flow, coolant fuel and air temperatures, engine rpm, pedal position, etc.

I'm probably at best, half correct about these things, and mostly wrong. Please correct me (as that's the whole point of this thread).
I believe that the first thing the ECU does is look at the driver's wish map, aka, the go pedal.

Looking at this we can see that it tends to max out quantity of fuel injected at around 50 mg (I'll note that the maps don't actually say 50mg, they say a number and vagsuite translates that to 50mg, but since its calibrated for PD engines sometimes their translations may be off). Note that the map is nonlinear with respect to rpms. This lets you apply a light throttle and the engine will naturally stabilize at some RPM range (as at higher rpms it won't fuel). It also shows that above 5000 RPM it really pulls back on the fueling.
If I were to increase available boost I'd want to go into this map and increase the values so that I could achieve higher fueling.

There is also a related map called inverse driver wish, which is used by the cruise control. As I understand it the cruise control will inject whatever quantity of fuel is needed to maintain a particular speed, and based on the rpms and quantity injected it will move the pedal to show what the throttle position is. Not so important to mess with, but I could play some funny jokes on people by having their pedal go up and down randomly.

So the engine knows how much fuel it wants (max), it also needs to know how much air is available.
Air has a density of about 1.225 g/L at STP. The engine has a displacement of 1.9L or ~.475L per cylinder. So at STP we get 581mg of air available. This can be less with a restricted intake or if you are at high altitudes and there is less air pressure, but in general this is always the floor value of how much air is available. The engine will fuel up to the available limit of air. How does it decide this? With the smoke limiter map.

I also calculated the fuel air ratio in the smoke limiter

I've heard that stoich is optimal (14.6-14.7), but with a diesel you may want to lean it up a bit to reduce smoke (its really hard to burn that last bit when the oxygen is also almost at 0), something like 17-18 as a fuel air ratio. However, the apparent ratios here are much higher across the majority of the map. 20-24 seems to be the going rate. Also, as I understand it, you can decrease the FAR at higher boost pressures - at a 17:1 ratio at no boost you'll have some oxygen left over, but at full stock boost a 17:1 ratio will have twice as much oxygen (and due to the temperature, probably more than twice the partial pressure), so you could conceivably have a lower ratio and still achieve a smokeless burn. The other thing is that having a high ratio requires the use of excess boost which lowers the engine efficiency by creating drag with the turbo.

Can I lower the fuel air ratios across the board and increase my fuel economy?

The other thing that I am concerned about on this map is the max air quantity plateaus at 850mg - at 1.95 bar boost and assuming cool air and perfect air flow you'll have 1158mg of air. Increasing the available boost will increase this even more. Won't the smoke limiter interfere with proper fueling? Heck, If you look at the driver wish 40-50mg fuel is the max in that and I don't see where on the smoke limiter you can even achieve that.

There is also this map:

I believe that this is another hard limit on the quantity of fuel injected. Look at that, max fueling is 37.5 mg of fuel. I think that the torque limiter only pertains to the driver's wish and not to things like the idle fuel (since it clearly asks for fuel in those maps at 0-500 rpm, which is needed to start the engine). Together with the torque and smoke limiter we see that fuel is limited to 37-40 mg and the driver's wish has an effectively flat zone where it can be asking for 40-50 mg and not getting it. BORING. I'll have to do something about that.

There are a couple maps that control fueling behind the scenes. We'll start with the N146 Pump voltage map.

Once injection has started it will continue for a particular time determined by the pump voltage map. From what I understand voltage is applied to a solenoid in the pump to determine how long the injection event lasts. More voltage, longer injection, thus, more fuel. I do not know if this is linear, or what factors affect it (ex, fuel temp, engine speed).
On this map I notice a couple things. At 0 requested fuel it still applies voltage to the map from 1260 to 210 RPM. This I think is what helps maintain idle, starts the engine (gives fuel at low RPM from the starter), and creates the soft stop in RPMs when you push the clutch in (notice how the RPMs quickly drop to 1200 rpm and then they settle into 900 rpm softly?). 0 rpms gives 0 fuel, of course.
I see that at moderate fueling requests (from >0 to 20 mg) the voltage decreases with increasing RPMs or stays pretty flat. I am wondering if increasing the RPMs increases the pressure in the fuel pump thus needing less voltage or time open for an equivalent injection of fuel. Above 20mg requested fuel the opposite holds true, holding the injection event open longer at higher RPMs.
Does anyone know why this is?

Next up are the start of injection maps. I have a slew of these that I can see ranging from -20C to 86C. There only really appear to be two of them - a cold and hot one. This should be read as when the injection starts BTDC. Negative numbers indicate ATDC requests.

Hot Timing


Cold Timing

At 4C and below the cold map is used. There is a transitory map at 10C and 20C, and a hot map that is used at 35C and above.
Notice that as RPMs go up and in general, as fueling goes up the SOI goes up (more advanced). There are two reasons for this that I understand. For a given quantity of fuel you must have a given time period for injection and you want to balance the injection around TDC, so for higher RPMs you need to advance the start of injection because by the time you finish injecting the same quantity of fuel you will be further past TDC into the power stroke. Similar to this, for more fuel, you need to lengthen the injection event, both advancing the start of injection, and by lengthening the injection period, retarding the end of injection.

With a cold engine you want to advance timing to give the fuel more time to burn. With a hot engine you can retard the timing because the fuel burns more easily and you want to have most of the burn around TDC or just after it.

Some questions I have about the map are: what's with the bump in timing at 1491 RPM when cold? In fact, why are these maps so darn bumpy?
Also, why is the SOI after TDC in the normal driving regime on a hot engine (1500-2500 RPM, 0-20 mg/stroke)? Is this for efficiency or emissions?

The last fueling map I'll bring up is the Start Injection Quantity map.

When you're starting the engine this is how much fuel is injected at a given RPM and temperature of the engine. I've heard that on some maps on a hot engine it requests 0 fuel, leading to hot starting problems. Its otherwise not that interesting.

Continuing on... Boost! There is a map, the Boost Target Map

For a given RPM and *requested* fueling the ECU will look at this map and say "I want this much boost!" (If it wants 25mg @ 2500 rpm but is making 1000 mbar of pressure it will request 1500mbar and inject less according to the smoke limiter map).

---continued---
 
Last edited:

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
It will use the N75 duty cycle map to determine how to make the requested boost.

I honestly don't understand this map. Its not smooth, its rough, and its based on RPM and fuel, not RPM and requested boost. But anyway, I do like the spike at low RPM and requested fuel. This is why, if you turn the key in the ignition but don't start the engine (and there is still vacuum in the system) the turbo actuator will fully engage.

Also, maybe I didn't convert the values right but this seems awfully lean when I convert the target boost to a fuel air ratio.

FAR = (mbar / 1000 *1.225 g/L * .475L) / fuel mg

Of course we need to limit the boost and I'm sure you've seen this VNT15 compressor map image passed around here (its popular).

For simplicity's sake the Y axis is roughly ATMs or Bar. The X axis roughly corresponds to RPM / 500 (so 2000 RPM is about 4). Someone has drawn a line at 2.1 bar, I don't know why - the max on the boost target map and SVBL is 1.95 bar and the Boost Limiter Map is capped at 2150 (you'll see that soon).

The correction for the air flow (30C, .96 bar) puts the density of air at 1.104 g/L. At 2000 RPM and perfect flow at 0 boost we would flow 1900 L of air per minute or 2.097 kg/min. I think assuming at least a 5% inefficiency in air flow (for a safety margin) is being generous, so therefore, assume the bottom number is RPM/500.

On the graph, the left side is the overspeed region where the compressor will surge or become supersonic and destroy itself. To the top is also an overspeed region, don't go there. And to the right is the stall region where it just doesn't work (but I don't think it will be harmed).

This is why people say that you can safely increase the boost on a stock VNT15 to 17 psi, and even higher (18-20) (problem is that a boost spike can throw that above the safe zone easily if you've set it near the edge).

There are two limits on boost that I have found. The SVBL (Single value boost limiter) is a single value (1990 mbar). There is also the Boost Limit Map

I think that hitting the boost limit map will trigger limp mode. Note that there is an atmospheric pressure section in the chart. Yes, the engine would be ready for Mars or Venus if you could just transport it there. Except, that the maximum boost pressure in this chart is flat. a 2.15 ratio would be fine at 1 ATM, but it is unacceptable at higher elevations, easily pushing the turbo into grenade territory at low RPMs.

While we're talking about air I'll bring up the EGR map.

Basically, the stock EGR turns off at 3600 RPM and above. Below that it will keep working for a while. You can turn this off by setting the entire map to 8500.

Other maps I've found:
MAP linearization (calibrating the MAP sensor I think)
MAF linearization.
Launch control map (whether ASR is on or off at particular RPMs, I think)
Idle RPM: at 10C and above it idles at 903 rpm, below 10C it increases idle speed to 1134 at -20C.
And a couple of others which aren't identified and aren't immediately obvious but look interesting.







If you can identify any of these or if there are any I missed let me know.
I think there is also something that adjusts fueling based on temperature as well.

In summary:
For the most part your foot determines expected fuel delivery.
Fuel delivery checks the smoke limiter and torque limiter and limits fueling, then it goes to the SOI map and N146 pump voltage map to determine when fueling starts and how long it lasts. (If I stick on larger nozzles and possibly a lift pump the fueling will increase for a given window, thus letting me retard the SOI map and decrease the pump voltage to achieve a more fuel efficient burn closer to TDC. Alternatively if I want POWAH I could keep the same apparent SOI and pump voltage and bump up the boost for a given quantity of fuel. The latter would probably be easier and more elegant).
Next, for a given quantity of fuel requested it checks the MAP sensor, boost target map, and N75 duty cycle and will attempt to hit a particular level of boost (limited by the SVBL map?). I am not clear on what order this occurs in. Just that after boost is developed apparent MAF increases and more fueling is enabled via the smoke limiter map.
So you say, give me 100% power. Which says, give the driver 40 mg/stroke. The computer checks the torque limiter and drops that to 37mg/stroke, and then the MAF which says "low airflow" and drops the fueling to 15 mg/stroke. The requested fueling is still 40mg/stroke so the boost target map says "do 1750 mbar" and the duty cycle is increased until the boost is developed, and you get more fueling.

Short term I've gotta disable my EGR to turn that CEL off, that should be trivial. Then I'd like to tweak the boost maps so that the low RPM boost is not hugging the surge zone and the high RPM boost is allowed to develop the full power, probably bump it up from 14 to 17-18 PSI (1950 to 2250 mbar). I'd also like to put in a limiter so that boost is lower at higher elevations for safety.
From the boost target map it develops boost at high RPM even without fueling - is this because it would develop that boost ANYWAY even with the VNT turned down all the way so it is listed as requesting that boost so that it doesn't trigger an overboost engine code? Or can I turn that down so that its not developing unnecessary boost (and thus increase fuel efficiency by removing turbo drag)?
Also, as noted, the fuel air ratios seem to be extremely lean - 25 and higher. Is this for real? Can I decrease them? If I'm not producing smoke and a getting a clean burn then it seems it would be more fuel efficient to again, not waste energy compressing the intake air when its not necessary. I could probably even drop the boost targets by comparing it to the EGR, since if I turn the EGR off the air will have more oxygen and less boost will be necessary.
As for the fueling, I don't know how to do this. The smoke limiter caps out at 38mg/stroke and 853 mg/stroke (which is equivalent to 1466mbar or 6 psi of boost). The torque limiter is capped at 37.5 mg/stroke as well.
How do I adjust the smoke limiter map for higher boost, how do I enable higher fueling with higher boost?
 
Last edited:

timbomfg

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Location
Woking/Twickenham, United Kingdom
TDI
VW Bora PD130
Screw it...

Popcorn is very simple...

2 methods, or the ability to have a 2 stage popcorn type thing mixed in with LauchControl

Basically, you need to enable the LC map (in the toolbar in the suite)

Once you do so, you'll see a new map appear on the side. ALL YOU NEED TO DO....

Is redefine 2 of the rpm values at the top of the map to something like 4500 & 4550. Critically, you need to keep the gap between the 2 values to something like 50rpm tops....like this...



Now in my case, my car will rev to 3850~ rpm, and the instantaneous fuel-cut will cause it to pop and splutter.

The values of 100/0 are NOT in percentage, they are in actual IQ limit, so what i've also done previously with this, is use it to smooth out torque-peaks in low gears when towing etc.

Both the RPM and KM/H values are re-definable, so one could, if one wished, enabled various limiters for speed/revs based on engine speed across the entire range. Wanna lock the car to 100mph....no problem!

To enable the 2nd level of popcorn (which is for use in-gear) involves the same principle, but in the torque-limiter map...



Same principle again, change the last rpm value to 50rpm higher than the previous, and dependant on turbo setup, raise the fueling a little so its still high enough to splutter (5-10% below peak in my case, but this depends entirely on how your car is tuned/what turbo etc).

At which point, when you hit the red-line in gear (not that you really ever should unless you're running a meaty-turbo), it'll pop and splutter.

There are questions as to how long the crank will cope with such abuse, but hay, with all silly-and-pointless fun-things, there's an associated risk!

So if you blow up your car, don't blame me!
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
timbo, interesting. I saw you linked to the launch control thread, but I didn't read it (Yet). So the launch control map is only for neutral? Or does it apply whether the car is in gear or not?

I think I'll keep the torque limiter map nice and smooth... haha.... I just want fuel economy and a bit extra fun. Not popcorn fun.
I notice the torque limiter values drop significantly whereas in dynos I have see the torque is pretty flat. I assume that this is an intentional calibration and when I edit my torque limiter map I should keep this drop (or at least go back and fix it if my cutch slips).

I spent yesterday trying to figure out how to get the smoke map and car to recognize higher airflows. Well, luckily I can change the X and Y axis in the smoke limiter, so I can bump the airflow the ECU can see and fuel at up to 999.999 (but can't go over 1000). That is the simplest and most elegant solution for a stock car so I'm going to use that.
But let's say your car isn't stock and you have a monster turbo and piping. The main solution is to go into the MAF linearization map.

This maps the MAF voltage to airflow. The independent variable is voltage, dependent is airflow. If you compress the airflow say, 2x with respect to voltage then when your ECU thinks it is getting 800mg/stroke it will be getting 1,600mg/stroke so you can tell it to inject 2x as much fuel across the entire smoke map (and everywhere else you have dependencies on the MAF you will need to change).

I think if you change the MAF maximum from 850mg/stroke to 999mg/stroke you will also need to change the EGR maximum from 850 to 999 unless you like CELs.
 
Last edited:

timbomfg

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Location
Woking/Twickenham, United Kingdom
TDI
VW Bora PD130
Regardless if gear, it'll do what its set to above, up until the speed above.

Edit2: If you have a wider-range'd turbo, one can flat-map once it reaches peak. What most stage1 mappers seem to do (of the Revo/Awesome/CC/"custom") maps i've looked at, is request an oem shape, but higher levels. You get the torque-kick, but it then softens across the range. Go take a look at a PD150/ARL stock map, and it holds values across most of the range.

And what you've done there with the MAF hurts my brain. I don't believe it'll work correctly as the maximum limit (diagnostic) of the MAF is something like 1200.

Basically, you're overcomplicating it. Just remove the MAF from the equasion (there is a switch in there to move from IQviaMAF to IQviaMAP which will allow you to run mafless and so becomes injection quantity via boost pressure.

Edit: No offence, just seems like a really odd way of doing it. I get your logic, but it seems overcomplicated...
 
Last edited:

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
I wasn't aware of the IQ via MAP or MAF switch. I'll have to look into those.

(you may have missed it, but I linked your first link in my OP)
 
Last edited:

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
Maybe I'll make two tunes, one that uses the MAF and another that uses the MAP.
I think that the MAF, if applicable, would give a more accurate assessment of airflow and thus be more fuel efficient.
We'll see.

I've started my preliminary tune. Let's make the assumption that I'm going to be looking for a 20% increase in power.
Since fueling caps out at 38mg/stroke we'll increase that by 20%. So I'll cap it at 45mg. So I'll head on over to driver wish and set the max from 2000-4000 RPM at 48mg/stroke, less above and below as well as making it more linear across the RPM range.

After the driver's wish the torque limiter is invoked. I think I'll keep it stock to 1500-1750 rpm and then ramp up to 45mg/stroke at 2250, and let it drop off at 3700 rpm.

I will return to the torque limiter once I do my boost target map and consult the VNT15 compressor map - no point in asking for more fuel than available boost, else you could damage the turbo. The torque limiter doesn't change for different air pressures, and it should definitely scale down. While I doubt I'll be traveling up any mountains at 14,000 ft it seems prudent.

And lastly for now I'll play with the smoke limiter. If the max fueling I'll be using is 45 mg/stroke (pretty much maxing out these nozzles and the pump voltage map) then at an 18-22 FAR the max MAF would be 1000mg/stroke air, perfect since that's when the MAF maxes out with stock calibration.

I'll throw some maps up once I get them done and detail my next expectations.
 

timbomfg

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Location
Woking/Twickenham, United Kingdom
TDI
VW Bora PD130
IMHO you want to increase the range as a whole. You want to try and keep the oem delivery style as much as possible and retain the smoothness (raising some sections but not others will give you a nasty kick as the revs climb).

The suite actually has arithmetic options built into it to apply something like a 20% increase on maps where its appropriate (so for example the torque limit and drivers-wish maps).

FYI it makes more sense in the long run if you refer to drivers wish as just a throttle pedal map as it's not really a LIMIT per-se, it's just a request from the torque-map.

And tbf, raising the boost would allow you a little more scope. An ALH will happily go to around 120bhp if boosting to around 17-19psi.
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
Here are my first set of modified maps. I haven't tried to do anything too drastic to them. Just increasing the IQ and smoothing out the driver's wish. Raising the torque limiter (but leaving the low rpm fueling roughly intact). The smoke map, I wasn't sure about. The FAR on the stock map was roughly 17 at low RPMs and way higher at high RPMs. I tried to leave some of that intact but I just decided that around 18-20 across the board would be good. If I'm not smoking then I'm not wasting boost. We'll see. :)



 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
I'm looking at the start of injection map and can't really make sense of them.
At high and low RPMs and high fueling the start of injection is very early. When hot the engine retards timing to ATDC in the normal power range - moderate RPMs and low to moderate fueling. When cold the high and low rpm and high fueling SOI is about the same as when hot - only the normal range is changed (and its advanced to around 13-20* BTDC instead of 2-3* ATDC). My guess is that the SOI is retarded to ATDC when hot so as to reduce emissions, possibly sacrificing power and economy.

I wish I know what to set it to.
 

robnitro

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Location
NYC area, NY
TDI
2001 Jetta TDI GLS silver
In most tunes I have seen, the SOI goes up to a max of around 17-19 BTDC by 3500 rpm, up to redline. Not sure if that helps, and this is with WOT logs in 3rd.
I do know that tunes help economy and you probably stumbled upon why... the stock map pulls back timing for NOx concerns. I think also the EGR map affects it. More EGR allows for more timing if they are trying to limit NOx.
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
Yeah, I'm thinking that until I know more about how timing affects things I'll just advance the timing from 1-3* ATDC to 1-3* BTDC.

I got the cable in the mail today. Cross your fingers that it works and I can dump my ECU tomorrow.
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
Just tested it out, turned on launch control. Tehehe. It works.


I told it to limit fueling to 3500 RPM under 19 km/h. So at a stop I can mash the pedal all the way down and it will spin up to 3500 and build about 9-10 psi of boost, and then I can let off the clutch and it will try to hold 3500 RPM (up to max fueling) until its over 19 km/h, where it then drives normally.
Spin tires, spin! I can probably drop the RPMs even more. Make a 2000-2500 rpm version for people learning the manual.


This is my actual stock EGR map, which is different from every other map I have ever seen. I scratch my head at it. Whatever.


This is my SOI map. Notice those two bumps? I wonder what they are for, and if that reflects the more optimal SOI for economy and power in that range. The bumps are there in every other temperature range (except for the coldest maps) and the SOI maps change slightly for every temperature, unlike other ECUs I have looked at. I also notice that bump in an Audi AFN ECU I looked at, but not other ALHs.

I have to (gasp) work, so I'll mess around with the fun stuff later. :)
 
Last edited:

JFettig

Vendor
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Location
Blaine, MN
TDI
B5 Passat, 2010 Jetta
Remove the bumps in the SOI map, smooth it out. If you have stockish nozzles, you can increase timing on the top end a little. You can run 19 degrees of timing on stockish nozzles on an ALH no problem. Seems like the units are a little off?
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
What do you mean you can run 19* of timing? It looks to be like the timing goes all the way up to 25-35* at the upper ends. I might drop the bumps a bit, but I'll be advancing the timing on the bottom and smoothing it out.
 

JFettig

Vendor
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Location
Blaine, MN
TDI
B5 Passat, 2010 Jetta
Seems like the units are off. - shouldn't say 35 degrees, almost looks like its double. I don't have a stock SOI map handy.
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
I suspected that the units were almost doubled. I can display it as hex, dec, or "easy" - which I think is calibrated to the readings from a PD and not VE engine.
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
timbo, easy puts it in terms every uses (mg/stroke, deg). The hex and decimal views are the raw numbers (135AF, 15000, etc).
 

Sbeghan

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Location
Triangle, NC
TDI
03 Jetta Wagon 5spd 390k mi
Just tested out my first attempt at a tune. Again, tehehe. This is fun. Surprised my clutch didn't slip when I was trying to push 17 psi and 45 mg/stroke into it. I'm getting some boost spikes I didn't expect (nothing over 20 psi, but it will go up to 20, then settle into 19.5, before dropping to 17 which is what I specced).
Took some logs comparing IQ (requested & actual), MAF (requested and actual), and MAP (requested an actual). Am going to look through these and try to figure out what to do from here. i suspect cut back on boost or change the N75 valve mapping and bump up the fueling in the smoke map - I didn't have any noticeable smoke at WOT during daylight.
 
Top