That's a great feature on a lot of EVs and PHEVs! Unfortunately our Fiat's telematics were only good for 3 years after the date of purchase, so we don't have any remote access. That said, just turn the key on and it starts blowing out heat immediately, even when plugged in. So I'll just go turn it on while I make my morning coffee.If it's really cold out, I preheat the car while it's still plugged in.
I haven't really found any (what I consider to be) reasonably priced e-Golfs. Availability is low and prices are very high compared to similar EVs (Nissan LEAFs, used 500es, even some new Chevy Bolts (comparing new to new). keep your eye out though; the e-Golf is a good car and you get very nice VW driving dynamics.Thanks for the responses. I knew that resistance heating was a power hog. I was trying to figure out if cost and complexity of the heat pump system was worth the added cost.
I use heated seats and steering wheels when possible and I am used to TDI taking longer to blow good heat than my commute is long. So preheating before I drive and only using for window defrosting and minimal heating is a realistic possibility for me.
I am constantly looking the ads for used eGolfs for a deal and this is a big deciding factor between possible cars.
Jason
Yea, instead of signing on, I just hit the button on the remote.Some HEVs and PHEVs also have remote heat on the key - I know the Volt does, the Prius Prime (which doesn't have telematics at all in lower trims) does, and the Pacifica Hybrid does.
And, some also have the ability to schedule heat through their infotainment.
I don't see the heat pump as adding too much complexity vs. the standard A/C. If its just like a residential heat pump then there is very little difference between an A/C unit and a heat pump. Just a reversing valve and some extra refrigerant piping.I was trying to figure out if cost and complexity of the heat pump system was worth the added cost.
Probably because you've already made up your mind that there isn't an EV out there than can possibly measure up to your diesels, so you "cherry pick" reasons to confirm that bias.with all the drawbacks of EVs I do not see how it is "better" than my current setup.
Agreed. And as Tesla's model portfolio evolves, the trickle down plan as it looks to be, perhaps the models that us mere peons could afford to buy will become available. However, by that time the other manufacturers will likely have more offerings and in some cases maybe less "goofy" ones at that. The electric versions of the Golf, 500, etc. are far more appealing to me as far as looks and ergonomics are concerned than the rolling 1980s video game Teslas.Although, part of what Tesla's trying to do is come to, if not the Silverado owners, the X6 and GLE Coupe owners where they are, with an electric.
Other than his making the case against EV's by stretching the extremes about average mpg's and kWh rates he's paying, I wasn't at all questioning his reasoning. When I'm going on a road trip; I'm grabbing the keys to my TDI.Well I am not against them, but there absolutely is NOT an EV that is out there right now that can do what my TDI can do, so he has a point.
I can afford to put a measly $5 of fuel in a car to get to and from work every day. And this is a car that, all in, I have about $5000 in total, and have already driven it 140k miles, and will easily drive it 140k more, and it will continue doing what it does same as it always has.
When I can buy a used eGolf for $1500, have it go 100 miles a day or 700+ miles on a fill up whenever I feel like it, and do so beyond the half million mile marker, I will be first in line to get one.
(
Bolded text is exactly why ICE hybrids will be the solution. They are flexible, can have more cargo space due to smaller batteries and negate the need for owning a highway and a city car. Wouldn't it be nice if the TDI had both plug-in and regenerative braking technology on it?Other than his making the case against EV's by stretching the extremes about average mpg's and kWh rates he's paying, I wasn't at all questioning his reasoning. When I'm going on a road trip; I'm grabbing the keys to my TDI.
We can always convince ourselves a car is wrong for us if we focus only on it's disadvantages. I once owned an Audi S4 wagon. It had a loud, aftermarket exhaust and was a pig on fuel. It didn't come anywhere close to 53 mpg, and I owned it at a time when 91 octane was approaching CDN $5.00 per gallon. That didn't stop me from loving it.
I'm not asking him to buy an EV - only to keep an open mind.
The solution to what? I wasn't aware there was a problem.Bolded text is exactly why ICE hybrids will be the solution.
The solution to having one vehicle for multiple uses. I have to haul lots of stuff and right now I'm doing up to 900 miles a week on the interstate, sometimes under time pressure. Having a TDI Passat with huge cargo capacity, a small battery recharged by plug in or regen for short trips would be an ideal vehicle.The solution to what? I wasn't aware there was a problem.
Why take on the extra weight and complexity? I'd much prefer EVs with faster charging capabilities (800 volts) and a robust world-wide charging network. 200 miles of range added in 15 minutes of charging plus 300 miles of total range should be adequate for even the most dedicated of road warriors. If you can't stop for 15 minutes every three hours, then I feel sorry for your bladder and circulatory system. You have to remember that unlike pumping gas where you can't walk away from the car, the EV charging process (Tesla, specifically) requires approximately 10 seconds of driver interaction and the car charges while you do something else like eat, pee, run errands or walk around.Bolded text is exactly why ICE hybrids will be the solution. They are flexible, can have more cargo space due to smaller batteries and negate the need for owning a highway and a city car. Wouldn't it be nice if the TDI had both plug-in and regenerative braking technology on it?
That would fit most of our driving habits. We try to stop every two hours for at least a bio break. If they put chargers at more of the interstate rest stops, that would give us probably 75% of our charging needs while on road trips.I'd much prefer EVs with faster charging capabilities (800 volts) and a robust world-wide charging network. 200 miles of range added in 15 minutes of charging plus 300 miles of total range should be adequate for even the most dedicated of road warriors.
All very true, ain't an easy problem to solve. We are in a transitional stage and nobody knows what is going to happen, that is why I prefer flexibility.Grid capacity isn't much of an issue depending on what time the vehicle is charged.
Also, in an emergency, generators are often used anyway, and could be used for charging. And, you've often got issues getting liquid fuels, too, until you've got generators to run the pumps.
There aren't many people that keep there EVs discharged... so it's not like there would have been a surge in people charging their cars. They also had days to prepare and evacuate.Here is a thought experiment. If the residents of the Florida Keys had a 100% electric car fleet as well as electric utility and emergency vehicles, everyone would be screwed. Flexibility is important because the current electric grid is not reliable and does not have enough capacity.
Conversely, the evacuations across much of the state of Florida crippled the liquid fueling infrastructure for an entire week, causing people to run out of gas and get stranded while trying to evacuate. The power in most of Florida was only out during the storm and for some periods after. The areas without power were also without gas. Many people returned home several days later to find that many parts of the state still didn't have gas.Here is a thought experiment. If the residents of the Florida Keys had a 100% electric car fleet as well as electric utility and emergency vehicles, everyone would be screwed. Flexibility is important because the current electric grid is not reliable and does not have enough capacity.
Unfortunately, a lot of people in that region think they've already experienced extreme weather ("we've been through plenty of hurricanes") and are skeptical of the possibility that more extreme weather than their life experiences have shown them could happen in the future.If people cannot outrun a massive storm moving at 10 MPH that was dominating the news for a week I have no sympathy, regardless of how your car is powered. I have relatives there. If you choose to live in an area that is prone to weather like this, you should have provisions in place to deal with it. Failure to plan is planning to fail.
The part that bothers me is how the old folks homes (and Florida is PACKED with those) were poorly managed. People that could not help themselves and are dependent on others should not have had to suffer like that. In what is, again, a known area for extreme hurricane possibility.
My aunt works at a large hospital outside Tampa, and was shocked how many people had no planning in place. She's lived there since the early '80s, so this was not as big of a crisis for her, despite everything that happened. She had her car full of gas, an extra jerry can full on hand, plenty of food and water and clothing and necessities. Common sense.