EGR del and CEL, new quick fix

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
Has anyone else tried this?

In order to prevent P0402 EGR Excessive Flow errors I have attenuated the signal from the MAF not by any sort of electrical means but simply by rotating it in the housing. I allready had the EGR adaptation but was still getting the CEL after my EGR delete. I used VAG-COM and rotated the MAF until the readings for actual and requested MAF matched at idle. I used to have to clear the code daily with my Scangauge.... I've been running for three weeks with this setup, no codes, great economy, no difference in power (reads over 850mg/stroke at 3000rpm allthough maybe because it is a 2.0L GAS MAF)



 
Last edited:

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
Pictures of old and new style MAF sensors

Here are some pictures to illustrate what I did. The 2.0L GAS MAF I am using looks like the old style on the left. The one on the right can not be rotated as far, but it can be swapped into the old style housing easily (once you get rid of those annoying security screws) and it doesn't change the VAG-COM reading too much as far as I can tell.

The part numbers (2.0GAS MAF not shown, it is happily working in the car! Availabe upon request)
EDIT: DO NOT USE ANY OF THESE PART NUMBERS. ALL OF THE HOUSINGS AND MAFS ARE MIXED UP AND I DON"T KNOW WHICH IS WHICH!!!



The sensors are a bit different, the old style has a straight mesuring chamber, the new style has an angled measuring chamber




Airbox side (air goes in this side of housing) note the original style has a metal screen but the new style is all plastic and has some crazy flow alignment vent area (the smaller cylinder in the larger cylinder) to align the flow to the angled part in the sensor.




Engine side (air comes out this side) with sensors sitting in their normal straight position:



And here is how far I rotated the one on the left. The one on the right can only be rotated slightly due to the housing.



The old sensor came with the car and died around 100,000km. The new sensor works, but I haven't tried rotating it in an old style housing yet. I will have to get around to this one day, because if that new TDI sensor requires less rotation to get the same reading as the old GAS sensor then it would block less air flow when rotated. Anyway. Still no CEL and loving it!
 
Last edited:

puter

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Location
Tacoma, Washington
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
it really seems to me like this would cause problems since the amount of boost is determined based on maf readings.
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
puter said:
it really seems to me like this would cause problems since the amount of boost is determined based on maf readings.
The weird thing about this mod is that it lowers the MAF reading at the low end when EGR flow is expected but it doesn't seem to affect readings at high end when there is lots of flow and I am making boost.

Also, I think you are wrong about the ammount of boost being determined based on MAF readings. On the ALH engine there is a MAP (manifold air pressure) sensor that determines boost. I have an analog boost gauge that I have checked against the ECU boost reading from the MAP (using digital ScangaugeII) and the boost behaves pretty much the same before and after this mod.

Actually, you are right, a reduced MAF reading will reduce fueling which will reduce boost. But like I said this mod doesn't seem to affect the top end MAF readings. This mod would be for those people who are not looking for maximum performance, just a cure for the EGR delete CEL without having to get their ECU reprogrammed.

Also, modifying the MAF reading is nothing new... I'm just proposing a simpler way to do it, a possibly better way for the reasons described above.
 

puter

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Location
Tacoma, Washington
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
Ah, ok.

I was going to question you on saying that the maf doesn't affect boost :)...if it didn't affect boost you wouldn't get an overboost condition when it is under reporting :)

Anyway, I just wasn't familiar with changing what the maf was reporting and it seemed a bit dangerous to me.
 

fahrfrompuken

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Location
Austin Texas, USA
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI 5spd
narf,

I just did the EGR delete and cooler delete a couple of days ago. I immediately got a CEL (P0401) and verified that today with a scanner. I also had P0672 (Glow plug #2). I fixed the glow plug problem - I had put anti-sieze compund on the threads of the glow plug and had a consistent CEL for quite a while. I cleaned the threads of the glow plug and also cleaned out the glow plug harness connectors and the top of the glow plugs with carb/choke cleaner and all is well with the glow plugs now.

Now, back to my P0401 CEL issue. I put in the kit per dieselgeek's instructions. Unfortunately, he does not tell you what to do with the actuator solenoid vacuum line and electrical connector. He also doesn't tell you what to do with the EGR vacuum line. Right now the solenoid is hanging there on a cable tie still connected as usual and the EGR vacuum line is plugged up with a piece of rubber.

Questions:
- Do I unplug the electrical connector from the solenoid valve or leave it connected?

- What do I do with the vacuum lines? Plug them up?

I just drove to the auto parts store and no CEL yet, but the engine barely reached temp and I was just going through the neighborhood so no high speed or load driving yet. Hopefully

Help anyone! Please!!! :(
 

puter

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Location
Tacoma, Washington
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
you used the kit that blocks the exhaust coming into the egr?

my guess is that you just plug the vag line into the egr. You get the error I think because the ecu can tell that the egr isn't there. Since the exhaust is already blocked off, allowing the egr to open won't affect anything.

caveat: I have not done this procedure so I am just guessing.
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
Farfrompuken,

You must plug the vacuum lines to prevent vacuum leaks. You must keep the EGR solenoid electrically connected to prevent a CEL that says the solenoid is missing... but I'm not sure what that one is.

You are getting P0401 is EGR Insufficient flow? That is the exact opposite of what most people get P0402 EGR excessive flow? I think you need to check for vacuum leaks and plug that N18 solenoid back in.
 

fahrfrompuken

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Location
Austin Texas, USA
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI 5spd
I will double check the vacuum lines (I was thinking about replacing all of the lines out any way as a preventative measure).

Not sure what the N18 solenoid is. Can someone please explain?
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
fahrfrompuken said:
I will double check the vacuum lines (I was thinking about replacing all of the lines out any way as a preventative measure).

Not sure what the N18 solenoid is. Can someone please explain?
N18 is on the other end of the fat vacuum hose from the top of the EGR valve. It converts and electrical signal from the engine control unit (ECU) into a vacuum signal to the EGR valve.

No offense, but these questions are answered elsewhere on this site and in the service manual. The purpose of this thread is to talk about this specific way to adjust the MAF signal to prevent the EGR delete CEL as stated in post#1 and #2 and to find out of this has been done before or if it is a new and viable fix for everyone who doesn't want to get their ECU reprogrammed when removing the EGR system.
 
Last edited:

Jarmstrong

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Location
Mass
TDI
07 GMW LBZ, 95 F350 PSD, 03 Jetta
so what is the general concensus on this? Does it work with no adverse effects?

thanks
Jason
 

puter

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Location
Tacoma, Washington
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
Jarmstrong said:
so what is the general concensus on this? Does it work with no adverse effects?

thanks
Jason
The general consensus is that it works fine with the exception of a possible CEL.

The only other thing is that it's not really necessary. You may get a slightly increased MPG, but not if you're chipped, and the "new" diesel, in the US at least, doesn't really cause intake clogging so you won't really be helping with that either.

I personally did a quick and dirty delete by removing and plugging the vag line to the EGR. no CEL yet, but I'm chipped.
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
puter said:
The general consensus is that it works fine with the exception of a possible CEL.
There is no general consensus as I am the the only person who has ever tried rotating the MAF to my knowledge! :D

The point of the mod it avoid the "P0402 EGR Excessive Flow" Error and CEL you get when you do an EGR delete on a STOCK ECU (NOT CHIPPED).

My experience is that this mod works perfectly with a 2.0L GAS MAF and my stock ECU... its been over a month and 5000 or so km with no CEL. used to clear the cell every other day.
 

puter

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Location
Tacoma, Washington
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
NarfBLAST said:
There is no general consensus as I am the the only person who has ever tried rotating the MAF to my knowledge! :D

The point of the mod it avoid the "P0402 EGR Excessive Flow" Error and CEL you get when you do an EGR delete on a STOCK ECU (NOT CHIPPED).

My experience is that this mod works perfectly with a 2.0L GAS MAF and my stock ECU... its been over a month and 5000 or so km with no CEL. used to clear the cell every other day.
Sorry, I missread his post, I thought he was asking about general consensus of a delete :)
 

blktdi

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Location
Calgary, AB
TDI
99.5 golf TDI
Can you just block off the exaust side at the manifold and make a plate with a filter on the egr side to pull in fresh air whenever the egr opens? This way the maf is still reading the difference in air quantity as it would with the egr intact (hence no cel), when really you are getting more air and no exhaust.
Maybe a hose from the egr to the air box or have a seperate filter on the end.
 

Jetta2001TDI

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Location
Florida
TDI
2001 jetta
blktdi said:
Can you just block off the exaust side at the manifold and make a plate with a filter on the egr side to pull in fresh air whenever the egr opens? This way the maf is still reading the difference in air quantity as it would with the egr intact (hence no cel), when really you are getting more air and no exhaust.
Maybe a hose from the egr to the air box or have a seperate filter on the end.
It would not work because of the pressure diferences. Exhaust pressure is higher, it will just blow thru..
 

blktdi

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Location
Calgary, AB
TDI
99.5 golf TDI
Yeah i didn't think of that I guess there is quite a big difference, especially on our boosted engines.
 

shagin'wagen

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Location
Sherwood Park, AB
TDI
Bora
sorry to bring this thread back to the top, but how do I go about in VAG COM to find the display that tells me the actual and requested MAF flow? I'm planning on trying this mod tomorrow, the CEL is annoying!:p
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
Start the car, connected vag-com, click SELECT, ENGINE, MEASURING BLOCKS, use the up arrow under "GROUPS" to find the one that says MAF actual and MAF specified.
 

shagin'wagen

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Location
Sherwood Park, AB
TDI
Bora
NarfBLAST said:
Start the car, connected vag-com, click SELECT, ENGINE, MEASURING BLOCKS, use the up arrow under "GROUPS" to find the one that says MAF actual and MAF specified.
Thanks. I did the mod and it works! no CEL! I'm happy now, I don't need to blow $$$ on a chip.:p:D
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
Herm TDI said:
This issue of "Twisting" has been looked at a few years ago by another forum member.
Here is his input: http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=49754&highlight=MAF

But not a whole lot of indept reserach was carried out.
Thanks Herm! Seems like Boundless was trying to extend MAF life by increasing airflow over a certain part of the sensor or something? I think I am rotating the MAF in the same counter clockwise direction which they mention.

In my testing I have adjusted the "reading" at idle from 16g/s to right around the perfect 11.1g/s and haven't had to re-adjust it in a couple of months and a few thousand km. I use the Scanguage to check the MAF readings, here is how: http://forums.tdiclub.com/showpost.php?p=2073637&postcount=109
 

NarfBLAST

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 3, 2002
Location
Waterdown, Ontario, Canada
TDI
2001 Golf 5MT
MAF xGauge can be used to calibrate Narfmod instead of VAG-COM

Scangauge xGauge Coding for MAF
Some folks over at CLEANMPG.COM had a gread discussion on how the coding works...

http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8280&highlight=xgauge+coding&page =2

Here is how my MAF xgauge is set up...

TXD 686AF10110 ;reads OBDII MAF
RXF 044145100000 ;the number 4 in the 5th position gives you two decimal
RXD 2810 ;specifies scangauge to read 2bytes (0 to 655.35)
MTH
000100010000 ; math is simple, multiply by 1, divide by 1, no adder

Works on my car, only problem is that this is an OBDII reading with untils of grams/second (g/s) but VAG-COM users are used to readings with untils of miligrams/stroke (mg/R)

take mg/R multiply by rpm and divide by 30,000 to get g/s

here is the normal MAF test range (if you don't have the egr adaptation, idle = ~230mg/R)

idling with egr operating (no vag-com egr adaptation) ~230mg/R @ 900rpm = ~6.9g/s
idling with egr operating (with vag-com egr adaptation) ~370mg/R @ 900rpm = ~11.1g/s
3rd gear accelerating wot >800mg/R @ 3000rpm = >80.0g/s

Now you can just rotate the MAF in the housing until you read either 11.1g/s or 6.9g/s depending on wether you have the adaptation.

I would not recommend calibrating for 6.9g/s as this would seem to bring the whole range down too much. I assume anyone who is at this point has allready done the vag-com EGR adaption and still has a CEL. edit Feb15,08: After some research I have decided to put the EGR adaptation back to stock without adjusting the MAF (still reads 370mg/R (11.1g/s) at idle when requested is actually 230mg/R (6.9g/s) and no cel in the first 100km, 6 or 8 starts.
 
Last edited:
Top