TDIMeister
Phd of TDIClub Enthusiast, Moderator at Large
Ralph's post was merged into here.
the car only has a back up Camera the safety package which is 1690 is sensors ,Front Collision warning System,Blind spot Monitorwith rear traffic alert,and the HIDs,Led running lights,upgraded displayWonder what VW did to the Jetta TDI for 2015 to warrant the 46 mpg highway figure? They also got 10 more hp, up to 150.
With this change and addition of some much needed cameras to see at least rear corners of the car have me thinking I should trade up. Do they also have cameras to allow seeing where the front corners are too?
Ralph
Appears to be a belt to me.So the ea288 does not have a timing chain? *** I thought that was true?
So the ea288 does not have a timing chain? *** I thought that was true?
Wouldn't a chain hold up longer?Thankfully, no, the TDIs are still using a belt. At least the 4 cylinders are.
Wouldn't a chain hold up longer?
Where did you see that? There is no way that the belt will last indefinitely. It simply defies the laws of physics. Marketing is another story.They advertise the ea288 belt as never needs replacement though. So it def goes a lot longer than 100k
I haven't seen this anywhere. Do you recall where you read it?It does have a service interval. Believe I've read around 180K miles. I guess it actually sits in the oil, so that may lengthen the life of the belt. Unless they are going to warrant the engine that long, I'm not going to believe it. LOL.
The timing belt change interval on our 2011 Golf and 2013 Golf wagon is 200k km (125k miles)Well if the belt lasts longer than 100k miles that is a huge improvement. If they say lifetime I would go 150-200k before replacing it?
I haven't seen this anywhere. Do you recall where you read it?
I'd rather pay for a planned belt replacement than face a trashed motor from being fooled into thinking that a timing chain (and in particular ANY VW chain) was a lifetime component.Why do folks get so worked up about timing belt replacements? It's routine maintenance, something most people will only do once in a car's life, and, although not inexpensive, costs less than many other potential repairs. New dampers and supporting hardware can cost more than a belt replacement, as will most turbo failures. Cam and lifters on a PD cost more than the belt, in parts and labor, as do injectors. Although it's an expense we'd all prefer to not have, it's hardly something that would drive a car buying decision, at least not for me.
I agree. No big deal. Buy a new car or maintain the one you have. The latter is a less expensive choice.Few people, even here, keep their cars for more than 200K miles. And by 300K miles a lot of these cars need a cam and lifters or a cylinder head refresh, so the belt is coming off for that anyway. I just don't think it's a big deal.