Dieselgate: Volkswagen to Spend Up to $14.7 Billion to Settle ...

What will you with your Dieselgate TDI

  • Turn it in for the cash.

    Votes: 319 67.6%
  • Bring it in for the "fix" and the cash.

    Votes: 81 17.2%
  • Do nothing but keep driving.

    Votes: 72 15.3%

  • Total voters
    472
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

bristolvw

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Location
Bristol, VT
TDI
2010 Sportwagen
Was the market for a 2010 JSW really that much lower than a 2011 JSW pre-scandal? The buyback values are almost $4000 apart. Maybe I'm just out of touch but if I was buying a used TDI JSW back then I would not have expected a difference in value of that much.

Boy do I wish I waited a couple months to buy a 2011 rather than one of the last 2010s. Higher mileage 2010s (which most paid full MSRP for) seem to be at some of the lowest offer levels.

I'll probably take the buyback, because I'm doubtful about a fix being approved, but it hardly feels like a "generous" offer where they are trying to rebuild trust in VW. I had really hoped that there would be a decent buyback offer that would make people feel taken care of and think about getting a new VW. Seems like if VW is in this deep, they're being stupid to nickel and dime people and piss them off rather than make them appreciate their efforts to make things right. As of now it's basically just them buying the vehicle back (which I don't want to sell) at a reasonable price. I'm left with buying a lesser used car or having a car payment again. Yay!

Also am really ticked off over their lazy method for calculating mileage on 9/15. We put 27k a year on, so are losing extra $600 or so there.
 

dgoodhue

Veteran Member
Joined
May 3, 2014
Location
Framingham, MA
TDI
'14 6MT JSW
Was the market for a 2010 JSW really that much lower than a 2011 JSW pre-scandal? The buyback values are almost $4000 apart. Maybe I'm just out of touch but if I was buying a used TDI JSW back then I would not have expected a difference in value of that much.
Prices will sometime drop noticeably when car get old enough so that most of the used car sales are no longer on new car dealer lots.
 

sduck27

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Location
winchester, Va
TDI
golf s dsg
Here's my problem with the whole thing. I have a 2015 golf s dsg sticker was 24,500 i paid 23,000 out the door the compensation for me is 23,600 minus mileage which puts me at 22,400. Which is close to sticker, which I think is fair. So from my POV VW got to take a 6,000 interest free loan on my money while I was paying down the the loan, maintaining the car etc. In the mean time they where draging there feet since September about fix buyback etc. For me the only way to make things right is to take the mileage piece off pretty straight forward. I bought a TDI not because it was green because I would get 45-50 miles per gallon. I drive alot and many TDI owners are in the same basket.
 

Philpug

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Location
Reno, NV
TDI
Gone but not forgotten
Was the market for a 2010 JSW really that much lower than a 2011 JSW pre-scandal? The buyback values are almost $4000 apart. Maybe I'm just out of touch but if I was buying a used TDI JSW back then I would not have expected a difference in value of that much.

Boy do I wish I waited a couple months to buy a 2011 rather than one of the last 2010s. Higher mileage 2010s (which most paid full MSRP for) seem to be at some of the lowest offer levels.

I'll probably take the buyback, because I'm doubtful about a fix being approved, but it hardly feels like a "generous" offer where they are trying to rebuild trust in VW. I had really hoped that there would be a decent buyback offer that would make people feel taken care of and think about getting a new VW. Seems like if VW is in this deep, they're being stupid to nickel and dime people and piss them off rather than make them appreciate their efforts to make things right. As of now it's basically just them buying the vehicle back (which I don't want to sell) at a reasonable price. I'm left with buying a lesser used car or having a car payment again. Yay!

Also am really ticked off over their lazy method for calculating mileage on 9/15. We put 27k a year on, so are losing extra $600 or so there.
I am in the same exact boat and have had this question since the numbers were announced, the significant drop from "11 to '10. If the '10 numbers were in line with the '11 numbers I would be fine.
 

wmichaelis

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Location
New Jersey
TDI
2015 Jetta SE TDI
I could care less what VW owes the government or about the state of the company when all is said and done. I also don't care that Toyota paid the EPA nothing. They took care of the customer!!! That is what matters.

VW cheated, they lied, the committed fraud and tried to cover all of it up. VW is 2nd in the world to Toyota. They are trying to get out of this for pennies on the dollar at the expense of their patient, loyal customer base.

Oh, but I am required to sell.... I have 3 options. A fix that does not exist, sell back my car to the dealer, or opt out of the entire circus. Hmmmm....

What you are not understanding is this is not about how much pizza I have eaten. It is about cars that were sold under false promises (Clean diesel), marketed to a sector of people that value clean air, excellent MPG, and longevity/reliability. This was a huge case of fraud. It is not about how much of the vehicle I used because quite honestly, I could argue that the more someone drove their TDI, the more they polluted, caused environmental damage etc etc.. This is why CARB and the EPA are involved right? This is why the DOJ is suing VW right? Pollution...Lying..... Cheating.... Misrepresentation.....fraud.....

** I don't care about VW being "solvent" when this is done. As far as I am concerned, they can shut the doors and turn off the lights. They didnt care when they made a fraudulent sale to me..

You weren't around when "threadzilla" was up and running. If you were, you might understand that people have different life scenarios. Some have young families and needed larger vehicles last year. They wanted to sell. Some transport goats in their Sportwagons. Some are perfectly happy with no buyback, no fix, and just want to keep driving their car until it dies. Some had no interest in selling before the scandal broke and now are faced with a huge dilemma. I personally have a growing family and wanted to sell at least one vehicle late last August/early September. Unfortunately this mess stopped everything. Those that NEED to move on have been held hostage by VW for 9 months now. Radio silence with virtually no communication. If YOU are ok with this then fine... I am not!

We were promised "generous compensation" both by the Judge and by Ken Feinberg. Well, my idea of generous compensation does not start with a baseline of "Clean trade in value" and BS additions and SUBTRACTIONS for mileage and options with some high dollar options not even recognized. Sorry, your mileage may vary...
First, thank you for the clarification of terms, as well as how to get the retail price from KBB. According to them, right not, my car with my mileage should retail for $18,208. That is the suggested retail price. And as of right now, the value of my potential buy back offer from VW is $26,655. The +20% number for my current retail value brings me to $22,760, and that's still almost $4000 less.

I'm perfectly okay with that number being less than the $5100 I'm "supposed" to get, because my 2015 is fixable. There is no reason VW should have to pull it off the road, they should fix it, and get it back out there, in my opinion.

Now, to address some of your points above:

First, you miss the point I'm making about Toyota not having to pay that massive fine - it is entirely possible, if VW didn't have that fine hanging over their head, that they would be able to give everyone 150% of KBB value. It's a matter of reasonability - Toyota's total payout was $100 million, from what I've read - and VW will be out at least $17 billion. That is a massive difference. If VW had the option of not paying that fine, then that money could easily be used to do the "right" thing that Toyota did, and everyone could be happy. I don't find it at all hard to believe that they do not have that kind of resource available. $100 million is a slap on the wrist to Toyota, while $17 billion could easily be the kind of hit that closes the doors of VW forever.

You say you don't care whether or not VW is solvent at the end of this. You quote back to threadzilla (while I didn't have an account, I did read much of it...I generally don't feel the need to be as involved as I have been lately, but have read this forum for quite a long time - and have had nothing but good experiences doing so). You quote to how people have all kinds of different situations and circumstances, and how they rely on their VWs. 500,000 TDIs is only a small fraction of VW owners - what happens to everyone else who is relying on the company being around, if they're suddenly not? How does the average joe with a gas VW deal with warranty if VW doesn't exist, and the car he's relying on wets the bed? Or worse yet, someone out of warranty who now needs a part that previously only VW was building? Repair and maintenance costs will go through the roof, and people everywhere will be screwed.

Promises of "generous compensation" by a federal judge and Ken Feinberg...really? You're going to hang up on that? If I promise you generous compensation from Mark McGwire, due to all the lost innocence and wonder you experienced as a kid watching him hit home runs, now that you know he was on steroids...are you going to show up at his door demanding it? It's not the place for either of them to make that kind of promise to begin with. Judges are there to deliver justice, not payoffs.

Here's an excellent question. September 15, 2015, this announcement hits. You now know that your car is putting more into the atmosphere than it should be. You're arguing nice and loud that you're owed more than you're being offered. How much of that are you going to kick back, for the extra damage to the environment? It can be argued that you didn't know for all the driving you did before 9/15/2015...but what about the driving you've done since then? You knew it was more than should be allowed, and drove anyway - you're off the hook, because VW already lied? That's just as good as every time you hear some politician or other campaigning against same sex marriage, who was caught in a public bathroom with another guy.

Your argument against being penalized for higher mileage is also absurd. By your own estimation, you should be compensated based on the higher "retail" value of your car. A value which is very much calculated with that mileage in mind. You're already being given a pass on condition - something that those of us with pristine cars are paying for - now you want a pass on mileage, too. And the full retail value. And 150% of that value, to boot. Should a VW executive have to deliver it all in unmarked cash directly to your door, too, in between sessions with a VW provided supermodel/masseuse? You heard someone (who definitely had no place using the word) say "generous", and your eyes rolled over with dollar signs just like a Bugs Bunny cartoon, and now you're pissed. We should absolutely throw out a decision which is probably perfectly fine for 75% or more of the people it affects, to cater to your delusions of grandeur.

Once again, I'm hearing how you're "required" to sell. Give me some proof. Show me the link to a single article that says the state you are in is banning TDIs from the road, and that it is absolutely unfixable. For every one of you spouting how they don't have the fix yet, unless you're a high level VW employee, you're talking out of your ass. For all any of us know, they absolutely do have the fix, for all generations of the engine, and they are currently being evaluated by EPA and CARB, but just haven't been approved yet. They have 2 (or was it 3?) years to come up with the fix - to assume it isn't going to happen (when it will cost them even more in fines than they're already being made to pay) is naive in the extreme. If the fix was impossible, there would be no column in that spreadsheet for the older engines - it would be "sorry, we have to take them off the road, here's your buyback".

Also, the "I was held hostage for 9 months" argument...seriously? If you were in such dire need of trading in your car, and you'd have taken such a hit, where was the lawsuit you filed to cover your damages? YOU opted to wait and see what the fix would be, and to participate in the class. VW wasn't there holding a gun to your head preventing you from taking the loss on what you perceived to be the value of your car. Had the scandal not happened, and you went to sell it anyway, and you were only offered 90% of what you wanted because of your high mileage, who would you be pointing the finger of blame at while shouting "PAY ME" to anyone willing to listen?

You're entitled to so much money for being lied to, absolutely. Let me know once you've finished suing your parents about the stories of Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. And then the US Government, who we know isn't lying to us. I'm not saying any of that is right, and not excusing what VW pulled, just trying to exercise a little (and apparently quite uncommon) reasonability.
 

Philpug

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Location
Reno, NV
TDI
Gone but not forgotten
Heh..."loyalty"..really not the word I would use. I do think the dealers are getting the short end of the stick here. For me to consider another VW at this point, thousands in incentives below invoice, 0% financing and 4/50K maintenance.
 

FowVay

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2000
Location
Georgia
TDI
2009 Jetta returned to der Führer
I can't even get my local dealership to sell me parts at full retail in order to use my $500 loyalty card. They seem to think 20% over retail is a good deal.

I doubt they'll offer anything on new cars. I wouldn't be hurt if they closed their doors for good.
 

turboBear

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Location
NE PA
TDI
2013 Golf TDI (sold back to VW 2016/12/28)
Don't also forget that if the loan was through VW the loan would be written off ...
That's one of the very grey areas.

I'd love to see that happen, for a few reasons not excluding my car was financed through VW, but will only believe it is so when the ink is dry and the check has cleared.

If they write-off my loan it'll double my take-home from this and basically put me into a new 20k value vehicle for TTL "out of pocket" - free and clear. That is for me the Unicorn Situation - and one of the reasons I can't believe it'll happen.

Or, drive it until the belt goes, and sell it back right then, and let the repair be on them.
Careful, current verbiage in the proposal excludes any vehicle that can not move under it's own power. IF the TB is gone completely I don't see the vehicle driving into the dealership.

I think the real problem is a potential for "Salvaged Titles".. I know there was at least one person that was questioning... not sure what the answer was.
The FTC proposal specifically excludes salvage titles as candidates because they are excluded from the definition of "Operable" (Definitions II).

“Operable” means that the vehicle so described can be driven under its own 2.0-liter TDI engine power. A vehicle is not Operable if it had a branded title of “Assembled,” “Dismantled,” “Flood,” “Junk,” “Rebuilt,” “Reconstructed,” or “Salvaged” on September 18, 2015, and was acquired by any person or entity from a junkyard or salvage yard after September 18, 2015.
 

seth1065

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Location
NJ
TDI
2011 JSW with DSG, Panoroof, rear air bags and the always fun velcro blocks, Blue with beige int
But you did drive the car while you owned it, so you gotta account for that, I mean unless you maintained it and VW keep it on it's lot for others to drive. If you sold your car to me before, during , or after this mileage on it would affect your value so I think it is fair. Before anyone says I work for VW, my car has over 125,000 miles I bought it at the end of 2011 so I am taking a pretty large hit ($3000) for mileage but I drove the 125,000 + miles not VW.



Here's my problem with the whole thing. I have a 2015 golf s dsg sticker was 24,500 i paid 23,000 out the door the compensation for me is 23,600 minus mileage which puts me at 22,400. Which is close to sticker, which I think is fair. So from my POV VW got to take a 6,000 interest free loan on my money while I was paying down the the loan, maintaining the car etc. In the mean time they where draging there feet since September about fix buyback etc. For me the only way to make things right is to take the mileage piece off pretty straight forward. I bought a TDI not because it was green because I would get 45-50 miles per gallon. I drive alot and many TDI owners are in the same basket.
 

GSwag

Veteran Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2015
Location
Georgia
TDI
2013 Passat
First, thank you for the clarification of terms, as well as how to get the retail price from KBB. According to them, right not, my car with my mileage should retail for $18,208. That is the suggested retail price. And as of right now, the value of my potential buy back offer from VW is $26,655. The +20% number for my current retail value brings me to $22,760, and that's still almost $4000 less.
I'm perfectly okay with that number being less than the $5100 I'm "supposed" to get, because my 2015 is fixable. There is no reason VW should have to pull it off the road, they should fix it, and get it back out there, in my opinion.
Now, to address some of your points above:
First, you miss the point I'm making about Toyota not having to pay that massive fine - it is entirely possible, if VW didn't have that fine hanging over their head, that they would be able to give everyone 150% of KBB value. It's a matter of reasonability - Toyota's total payout was $100 million, from what I've read - and VW will be out at least $17 billion. That is a massive difference. If VW had the option of not paying that fine, then that money could easily be used to do the "right" thing that Toyota did, and everyone could be happy. I don't find it at all hard to believe that they do not have that kind of resource available. $100 million is a slap on the wrist to Toyota, while $17 billion could easily be the kind of hit that closes the doors of VW forever.
You say you don't care whether or not VW is solvent at the end of this. You quote back to threadzilla (while I didn't have an account, I did read much of it...I generally don't feel the need to be as involved as I have been lately, but have read this forum for quite a long time - and have had nothing but good experiences doing so). You quote to how people have all kinds of different situations and circumstances, and how they rely on their VWs. 500,000 TDIs is only a small fraction of VW owners - what happens to everyone else who is relying on the company being around, if they're suddenly not? How does the average joe with a gas VW deal with warranty if VW doesn't exist, and the car he's relying on wets the bed? Or worse yet, someone out of warranty who now needs a part that previously only VW was building? Repair and maintenance costs will go through the roof, and people everywhere will be screwed.
Promises of "generous compensation" by a federal judge and Ken Feinberg...really? You're going to hang up on that? If I promise you generous compensation from Mark McGwire, due to all the lost innocence and wonder you experienced as a kid watching him hit home runs, now that you know he was on steroids...are you going to show up at his door demanding it? It's not the place for either of them to make that kind of promise to begin with. Judges are there to deliver justice, not payoffs.
Here's an excellent question. September 15, 2015, this announcement hits. You now know that your car is putting more into the atmosphere than it should be. You're arguing nice and loud that you're owed more than you're being offered. How much of that are you going to kick back, for the extra damage to the environment? It can be argued that you didn't know for all the driving you did before 9/15/2015...but what about the driving you've done since then? You knew it was more than should be allowed, and drove anyway - you're off the hook, because VW already lied? That's just as good as every time you hear some politician or other campaigning against same sex marriage, who was caught in a public bathroom with another guy.
Your argument against being penalized for higher mileage is also absurd. By your own estimation, you should be compensated based on the higher "retail" value of your car. A value which is very much calculated with that mileage in mind. You're already being given a pass on condition - something that those of us with pristine cars are paying for - now you want a pass on mileage, too. And the full retail value. And 150% of that value, to boot. Should a VW executive have to deliver it all in unmarked cash directly to your door, too, in between sessions with a VW provided supermodel/masseuse? You heard someone (who definitely had no place using the word) say "generous", and your eyes rolled over with dollar signs just like a Bugs Bunny cartoon, and now you're pissed. We should absolutely throw out a decision which is probably perfectly fine for 75% or more of the people it affects, to cater to your delusions of grandeur.
Once again, I'm hearing how you're "required" to sell. Give me some proof. Show me the link to a single article that says the state you are in is banning TDIs from the road, and that it is absolutely unfixable. For every one of you spouting how they don't have the fix yet, unless you're a high level VW employee, you're talking out of your ass. For all any of us know, they absolutely do have the fix, for all generations of the engine, and they are currently being evaluated by EPA and CARB, but just haven't been approved yet. They have 2 (or was it 3?) years to come up with the fix - to assume it isn't going to happen (when it will cost them even more in fines than they're already being made to pay) is naive in the extreme. If the fix was impossible, there would be no column in that spreadsheet for the older engines - it would be "sorry, we have to take them off the road, here's your buyback".
Also, the "I was held hostage for 9 months" argument...seriously? If you were in such dire need of trading in your car, and you'd have taken such a hit, where was the lawsuit you filed to cover your damages? YOU opted to wait and see what the fix would be, and to participate in the class. VW wasn't there holding a gun to your head preventing you from taking the loss on what you perceived to be the value of your car. Had the scandal not happened, and you went to sell it anyway, and you were only offered 90% of what you wanted because of your high mileage, who would you be pointing the finger of blame at while shouting "PAY ME" to anyone willing to listen?
You're entitled to so much money for being lied to, absolutely. Let me know once you've finished suing your parents about the stories of Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy. And then the US Government, who we know isn't lying to us. I'm not saying any of that is right, and not excusing what VW pulled, just trying to exercise a little (and apparently quite uncommon) reasonability.
More asshat posts. your reasons and opinions may be different but people have a right to be upset. they have as much right to be upset and you do not to. I like hearing everyone's perspectives, it helps me decide what action I would like to take.

the situation is unfortunate for most involved. The only ones that this will help is the government. they get free money which VW will ultimately charge back to its customers and get to flex their muscles a bit. i'm not happy but it could have ended up worse for us.
 

wmichaelis

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Location
New Jersey
TDI
2015 Jetta SE TDI
NJ follows Calf emissions so if Calf screws the drivers NJ will also, BUT I really think there is no way NJ or any other state will say " Sorry Mr or Mrs. VW driver VW can not fix them so no new reggie for you"
Agreed. I don't think any of us will be forced off the road. I think there will be a fix for as many as there can be, and those that can't will be grandfathered in and allowed on the road as-is, with VW being fined $20K for each of them.

Last I checked even the most restrictive state (California) allows for exemptions (for instance: http://jalopnik.com/200-could-get-you-out-of-a-classic-car-smog-check-in-c-1699779618).
 

autdi

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Location
Alabama
TDI
2000 NB, 2003 NB, 2006 Touareg, 2015 Jetta, 2013 Beetle, 2013 Touareg
The FTC proposal specifically excludes salvage titles as candidates because they are excluded from the definition of "Operable" (Definitions II).
Watch out for the AND part. If it was a branded title, AND was sitting in a junkyard or scrapyard on 9/18/15, it is excluded. This prevents buying piles (literally), getting them to just move, and drop them off for the buyback.
 

sduck27

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Location
winchester, Va
TDI
golf s dsg
But you did drive the car while you owned it, so you gotta account for that, I mean unless you maintained it and VW keep it on it's lot for others to drive. If you sold your car to me before, during , or after this mileage on it would affect your value so I think it is fair. Before anyone says I work for VW, my car has over 125,000 miles I bought it at the end of 2011 so I am taking a pretty large hit ($3000) for mileage but I drove the 125,000 + miles not VW.
Here is the difference VW knew the where busted in 9 of 2014 and sold me the car anyhow. If it was done correctly they would have stopped selling when they knew they where busted. Plus at the end of the day after it was public it is going to be a year and month before they settled it. I'm paying for them draging there feet.
 

single94

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Location
usa
TDI
2012 passat tdi
Buy back Limits

I dont see alot of things addressed in the 46 page document so far.

What if a car was purchased new and resold many times prior to sept 15th 2015 who if anyone has a right to collect and what,?

Same question for the time period sept to 6-28-16 and of course same question for the buyer after 6-28-16 till future? how is it then split up?

If you purchased your car from a used dealership do they get any portion of the buyback? Its a little confusing on who gets what.

Im guessing whoever holds the title now, private party or dealership is entitled to half the money and the buyout figure on these cars in the fall?

Also it appears that no exclusions on a rebuilt tdi for a buyback or fix in the document?

Im thinking the goal is to buy them back and crush them? I havent seen this either, are they crushing them so they dont care what shape we bring them in, or they are exporting, only adjustments are for miles, none on any aftermarket purchases, wheel or other options puchased at the dealer or otherwise?

Where are they to be dropped off?
 

coolbreeze

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Location
Troutman NC
TDI
2015 Golf TDI SE DSG - 2016 Tig SE for the wifey
Watch out for the AND part. If it was a branded title, AND was sitting in a junkyard or scrapyard on 9/18/15, it is excluded. This prevents buying piles (literally), getting them to just move, and drop them off for the buyback.
I would hope they would realize there are people who legally purchased great running rebuilt vehicles on the 19th, 20th and for many months afterwords. Rebuilt cars can be the best value out there. Mine had minnimal damage. How it was considered a total loss I do not know. The owner must have waged war with the insurance company to get it.

So what will VW and the EPA do. Just let them stay out there. I would hope they want them off the road as much as any other. When I purchased mine my thought was I couldn't buy the 2015 I was on the way to buy on the 15th of sept and got a call from the dealer. The 2013 rebuilt would be a way for me to get in a tdi until the mess was cleared up at a minnimal loss when I sold it a year down the road. Didn't even fathom a buy back at that time.

I guess if VW doesn't buy them back I have a highly sought after car that you can't find in the market place and I should be made whole that way. We will see, but I still think they will make some adjustments to buy back legally purchased rebuilts to get them off the road.
 
Last edited:

wbclassics

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Location
Syracuse NY
TDI
No TDI - VW Bought it Back (Dec 4th 2017)
Nope . . . you used it and it did the job - this issue is pretty much on paper only, and had zero impact on your use of the car for transportation, so it's only reasonable that you pay something for that use.

- Tim
No, if I knew the vehicle wasn't compliant with federal regulations when I was vehicle shopping in 2013, I wouldn't have purchased a TDI.

And then after being defrauded at the time of purchase, I had to deal with VW an exhaust flapper failure, frozen intercooler (fix installed), frozen front door locks that wouldn't latch, and a frozen (supposedly fixed with Cold Weather Kit) intercooler again that now requires a trip to the dealer twice a year (Spring & Fall) just for the removal and re-installation of a certain piece of plumbing in the induction system so that the engine only breathes warm under-hood air during the winter months. Three of those warranty issues were VW TDI specific issues.

VW's cheating on emissions just reinforces how inadequate the development and engineering was on this whole series of recent VW diesel vehicles. These decisions to short-cut development were made specifically to increase VW's profit margins on the product. Then VW's TDI advertising campaign was successful enough that TDI sales accounted for roughly 1/3 of VW vehicles being sold in recent years, increasing VW's overall sales figures here in North America. If you wanted a diesel sedan under $30k (or so), you bought a VW TDI, you didn't go out and get a Chevy Cruze Diesel. VW had a reputation of excellence on the TDIs and the deceptive advertising contributed to our decision to purchase a VW TDI.

I was defrauded by VW on the day I signed the sales contract for my Jetta TDI in March of 2013. That is the date that I became a victim (and accomplice) of VW's criminal acts.
 

jsm172

Active member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Location
Jackson
TDI
Passat
You might want to get that in writing. IMO lawyers are looking to not get cut out of a deal. Even at that, they negotiate another 10% and the lawyer takes 30%.
Can you not request that the lawyer fees be paid in the the claim? I have never sued anyone but that just sounds reasonable to me.
 

wmichaelis

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Location
New Jersey
TDI
2015 Jetta SE TDI
More asshat posts. your reasons and opinions may be different but people have a right to be upset. they have as much right to be upset and you do not to. I like hearing everyone's perspectives, it helps me decide what action I would like to take.
the situation is unfortunate for most involved. The only ones that this will help is the government. they get free money which VW will ultimately charge back to its customers and get to flex their muscles a bit. i'm not happy but it could have ended up worse for us.
Please tell me, feel free to quote directly - where I said someone had no right to be upset. I argued against reasonability, period.
 

Freeze Plug

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Location
CT
TDI
Turd Sandwich
no offense, but most of your questions can be answered in the court documents and the large thread at the top of the page
 

Jedadiah

Veteran Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Location
Central Kentucky
TDI
Former: '15 Passat TDI SE 6M, '15 Golf S 6M and '10 JSW
Ea288

Check out the EA288 emissions in this graph from the CARB page. Other than to slap VW across the face, why even bother messing with updating the 2015s for such a small theoretical drop in NoX? Just make any new TDI meet emmisons and save the the owners the trouble of getting the fix.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/vw_info/consent_decree_graph.pdf
 

wbclassics

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Location
Syracuse NY
TDI
No TDI - VW Bought it Back (Dec 4th 2017)
The proposed settlement should also have never gone forward without VW specifically saying whether there was a fix or fixes available for each generation of car. And detailing specifics about the fix(es) and how it'll impact the vehicle's performance, reliability and fuel economy. How can you make an informed decision at this point, without knowing if a fix will ever be available for your car? Especially those of us that drive more than 12.5k miles a year, and so we actually get penalized if we have to do a buy back in the future if a viable fix never becomes an option.

VW hasn't had just 10 months to develop a fix. They've had 6+ years to have something on the back burner in case this ever became an issue they would have to address. Motivated by increased profits and pure hubris, VW elected not to do anything until they were caught. And even then, it took a further 10 months, just to come up with a plan that is inadequate to the innocent victims of VW's greed.

VW F*cked the government and every one that purchased a TDI since 2009. Now they should get f*cked.
 

Lobo56

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Location
NJ
TDI
2012 Jetta TDI
It seems to me, that if you pay $10 for a pepperoni pizza, and you get it home and it has anchovies instead, and you eat it anyway, you probably shouldn't be expecting to bring the empty box back and get a full refund. Take the full price you paid. Subtract the offer you are getting. Have you gotten that much value from car? I think the lion's share of the settlements should be able to answer that yes, if they're being honest and reasonable.

One problem with you pizza analogy you knew you were eating the anchovie pizza, we didn't know we had a software rigged car.
 

wmichaelis

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Location
New Jersey
TDI
2015 Jetta SE TDI
Check out the EA288 emissions in this graph from the CARB page. Other than to slap VW across the face, why even bother messing with updating the 2015s for such a small theoretical drop in NoX? Just make any new TDI meet emmisons and save the the owners the trouble of getting the fix.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/vw_info/consent_decree_graph.pdf
Because the update for the EA288 seems to be all software related, with additional sensors added to make sure the NOX emissions are in line. In theory, those of us with EA288's should be fixed within 15 minutes of showing up at the dealer - there is very little cost associated with it.

I think the extra sensors are a way of communicating "we caught you cheating once, now we're going to watch you like a hawk".
 

wmichaelis

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Location
New Jersey
TDI
2015 Jetta SE TDI
It seems to me, that if you pay $10 for a pepperoni pizza, and you get it home and it has anchovies instead, and you eat it anyway, you probably shouldn't be expecting to bring the empty box back and get a full refund. Take the full price you paid. Subtract the offer you are getting. Have you gotten that much value from car? I think the lion's share of the settlements should be able to answer that yes, if they're being honest and reasonable.
One problem with you pizza analogy you knew you were eating the anchovie pizza, we didn't know we had a software rigged car.[/QUOTE]

Very true. But as of September 15 2015, you did know - did that stop you driving it anyway since then? I know that's a simplistic approach, but there is some value to it.

There needs to be some level of personal responsibility for the owner of a car. If you put the miles on it, you should reasonably expect to have to pay for putting those miles on it, to some extent or other.
 

solBLACK

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Location
Wisconsin
TDI
2015 Golf TDI SE
Nope . . . you used it and it did the job - this issue is pretty much on paper only, and had zero impact on your use of the car for transportation, so it's only reasonable that you pay something for that use.

- Tim
It would be reasonable if they sold me the car they said they did. If this issue was about a faulty part/s that they didn't realize for years were a problem then I would understand. It wouldn't have been VWs fault, but that isn't the case here. They new for years that they were cheating their customers with the hopes of never being caught.

One problem with you pizza analogy you knew you were eating the anchovie pizza, we didn't know we had a software rigged car.
Very true. But as of September 15 2015, you did know - did that stop you driving it anyway since then? I know that's a simplistic approach, but there is some value to it.

There needs to be some level of personal responsibility for the owner of a car. If you put the miles on it, you should reasonably expect to have to pay for putting those miles on it, to some extent or other.
What were we suppose to do? Sell the car at an even bigger loss because VW lied to us without us knowing? I'm not financially stable enough to just go out and buy another vehicle because the company I purchased my current car from are a bunch of ass hats.

How was it any of the consumers responsibility for this situation? Why should I have any responsibility because it's taken VW damn near a year to figure out how to clean up a mess they started back in '09?
 
Last edited:

jsm172

Active member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Location
Jackson
TDI
Passat
It seems to me, that if you pay $10 for a pepperoni pizza, and you get it home and it has anchovies instead, and you eat it anyway, you probably shouldn't be expecting to bring the empty box back and get a full refund. Take the full price you paid. Subtract the offer you are getting. Have you gotten that much value from car? I think the lion's share of the settlements should be able to answer that yes, if they're being honest and reasonable.

One problem with you pizza analogy you knew you were eating the anchovie pizza, we didn't know we had a software rigged car.

Along with VW KNEW they were cheating as with the pizza it was just an honest mistake more than likely.
 

da_jokker

Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Sacramento, CA
TDI
2009 Jetta
Buyback Feedback Idea

You know I was thinking about this feedback and how VW is supposed to get 85% and it got me thinking...

If only there were some sort of technology that, say for example, each TDI owner would have to go to and input in their specific VIN number and mileage. That would then report back what you would get as a Buy back vs Fix option.

Then, what if..just if... that place had a little Yes/No option as to whether or not you find that offer acceptable.. maybe even blow your doors off with a short free hand box for "comment".

come to think about it...by actually linking every individual VIN with the owners Acceptance choice, not only could you easily determine if you meet the 85%, but if you do not, you would know exactly which VIN's (aka Model/Year) turned it down and you could adjust for those.


Man, if only we lived in the days of awesome tech like that. But instead, I guess we have to all pile in a court room or send e-mails or fill out forms or something.

Bummer :(
 

single94

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Location
usa
TDI
2012 passat tdi
offense

no offense taken, it doesnt give specifics as to if buyback is only to private parties or used dealers, no specifics if its rebuilt, salvage or otherwise, so it seems that this doesnt matter, i know personally it didnt on the goodwill package as i own a rebuilt and a salvage title car, no issues with the good will, i was going to rebuild the salvage car, but why if they are going to get crushed, bought back anyway? I have owned them for 3 years now, so trying to figure out.

I also have a clear title one with alot of miles i just bought plan on keeping when the low mile one gets bought out, so figuring out is not as easy if its not specifically stated in the document. I have read thru it, thats why i posted the question.

If you see where it addresses rebuilt or salvage please let me know, i dont see it being excluded.

Not sure how they would determine ownership prior as well, as i have owned 10 tdis in the last 5 years, who gets what if multiple owners if anything at all.
 

BrentRN

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Location
New London, PA USA
TDI
Used to have many. Now a Golf TSI.
QUESTION WILL THERE BE A 2017 TDI?
My guess is that VW will never sell another TDI in North America. They don't want to be in the position of saying, "These TDIs are clean. This time we really mean it". Especially when they will also be dealing with buybacks and fixes until 2018.

I find it especially interesting that even on this forum of TDI enthusiasts around 2/3 have opted to sell their TDI back to VW. I believe the general population of TDI owners will probably turn theirs in at an even higher rate.

Diesel has been forever tainted in the US and Canada. It was clawing back from its old perceptions only to be pushed back into the sinkhole of misinformation. Only this time there will be no getting back out of that hole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top