Didn't see this coming - EPA shift

pro51492

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Location
Hustisford, WI
TDI
2012 Sportwagen TDI 6sp
I told my co worker they probably crawled under our cars and were looking for emissions equipment. We both drive dieted TDI’s. Not sure what the actual emergency was? I couldn’t find any thing on the local news.
 

BEWtheDEW

Active member
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Location
Montana
TDI
2005 VW Jetta Wagon; BEW; 5 Speed
The decline in EU new diesel passenger car registrations is quite dramatic. From 89% in 2019 to about 15% in 2023. End of an era.
Yep. Honestly on the same note, I’ve been noticing more of an interest in TDIs here in the states, and especially because of how much power they can make whist still being fuel-efficient. Not sure of activity has picked up much here on the forums, but Ive been noticing more of a resurgence. There is still a potential, I wish to fill that stopgap, and I am not sure if it will take hold, since the current market is volatile, especially with EVs in the mix. I love these cars and I want to see that resurgence lmao.
 

oilhammer

Certified Volkswagen Nut & Vendor
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Location
outside St Louis, MO
TDI
There are just too many to list....
$10M fine after $33M in revenue, I'd be OK with that, LOL.

I wonder how the actual numbers played out. Pretty interesting, anyway.

I just wish I'd have purchased everything to delete my CR, as now it looks like I'm going to have to smuggle it in myself.
 

pro51492

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Location
Hustisford, WI
TDI
2012 Sportwagen TDI 6sp
You could be onto something.... wasn't the presidential debate on last night? At least that's what I saw in my igloo up here....
Boy they sure are proud of the work they are doing!
 

Dwmorrissey17

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Location
Cincinnati, Oh
TDI
1999.5 ALH Jetta, 2003 ALH Jetta GLS

atc98002

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Location
Auburn WA
TDI
2014 Passat TDI SEL Premium (sold back), 2009 Jetta (sold back), 80 Rabbit diesel (long gone)
$10M fine after $33M in revenue, I'd be OK with that, LOL.
If it was $33M profit, then yeah it pencils out. But if that's gross revenue, chances are his actual pocket money was less than the fine.
 

oilhammer

Certified Volkswagen Nut & Vendor
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Location
outside St Louis, MO
TDI
There are just too many to list....
Yeah, that's what I mean by wondering how the actual numbers worked out.

Big companies get to pay fines all the time, be nice if little ones could, too. I'd gladly pay a $1000 fine instead of a $5000 repair.
 

gearheadgrrrl

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2002
Location
Buffalo Ridge (southwest Minnesota)
TDI
'15 Golf DSG, '13 JSW DSG surrendered to VW, '03 Golf 2 door manual
Much of the problem is that the average EPA employee (except the folks who do useful stuff like clerical and janitorial work) is a liberal arts major with a $100K+/year salary= They can afford new EVs every couple years. They have no understanding of the rest of us with long commutes to lower paying jobs so we have to make cars last 20+ years. They think they're saving the world, and we're supposed to junk our 10+ year old TDIs and buy new EVs like they do... Ain't gonna happen!
 

oilhammer

Certified Volkswagen Nut & Vendor
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Location
outside St Louis, MO
TDI
There are just too many to list....
And they also force the older cars to be kept on the road longer than they would have otherwise, which also doesn't necessarily make the case for the environment to their way of thinking.

This is why pre-DPF diesel trucks are like gold mines now, and people are pulling them out of weeds after sitting for years and resurrecting them. And that's peanuts compared to what older OTR trucks can sell for now. I watched a 2017 Pete 389 with low miles (rural, seasonal farm use) sell for six figures OVER what it sold for new.... and it was a day cab!!! And there were 20+ bidders!
 

wxman

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 26, 1999
Location
East TN, USA
TDI
Other Diesel
This may have mentioned before, but EPA acknowledges that a shift to more electrification in medium- and heavy-duty trucks will result in an increase in primary (direct) PM2.5 emissions at least through 2055. The increase in PM2.5 emissions from electricity generation units (EGUs) more than offsets the decrease in "downstream" (i.e., emissions from the vehicle) and "refinery" PM2.5 emissions.

Direct quote from an RPA technical document:

"...In 2055, we estimate the final standards will result in a net decrease of 61 million metric tons of GHG emissions. We also estimate net decreases in emissions of NOX, VOC, and SO2 in 2055. However, we estimate a net increase in PM2.5 emissions...." ("Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles: Phase 3 Regulatory Impact Analysis ," page 617)

It should also be noted that EPA doesn't anticipate a reduction in SO2 emissions until 2048 (page 626 of the RIA).

The trade-off of lower GHG emissions at the expense of an increase in some criteria air pollutants seems dubious.
 

TurboABA

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Location
Kitchener, ON
TDI
RIP-2010 Jetta 6spd 2014 Touareg Execline '14 A6 Technik S-line
Those who know and understand the tech will always gravitate towards the best option available....
Just fly under the radar as much as possible... just like the ones who are getting burned now with EPA fines and such did until they didn't anymore...
 

atc98002

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Location
Auburn WA
TDI
2014 Passat TDI SEL Premium (sold back), 2009 Jetta (sold back), 80 Rabbit diesel (long gone)
Much of the problem is that the average EPA employee (except the folks who do useful stuff like clerical and janitorial work) is a liberal arts major with a $100K+/year salary
I don't think you're being fair to government employees in general and EPA employees in particular. I have 40 years in the FAA, and yes I am highly paid. And I don't have a degree of any kind. But I have a very specialized job that not everyone can do. The same applies to many government positions. And the ones that don't require special skills probably aren't even making $100k. My daughter is a state employee (working for one of the state universities) with a Masters from Cambridge and she barely makes $50k.
 

K5FAL

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Location
Edmond, OK
TDI
2014 Passat
I don't think you're being fair to government employees in general and EPA employees in particular. I have 40 years in the FAA, and yes I am highly paid. And I don't have a degree of any kind. But I have a very specialized job that not everyone can do. The same applies to many government positions. And the ones that don't require special skills probably aren't even making $100k. My daughter is a state employee (working for one of the state universities) with a Masters from Cambridge and she barely makes $50k.
Dude, I gave a pilots license and I’m a locomotive engineer for a RR, so I appreciate what the DOT does. But we were never meant to live under a system in which government agencies make law. That’s what I hate. If Congress wrote the law, then by all means the executive branch should enforce it. But it all went sideways when they started pulling stuff out of their ass (like when the ATF ruled that a shoelace is a “machine gun”).

As far as TDI’s, I confess I have never read the Clean Air Act or anything that Congress has passed regarding emissions. Is the EPA sticking to that or are they pushing it much further?
 

lemoncurd

Veteran Member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Location
Eastern CT
TDI
2013 CJAA GTB2266

K5FAL

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Location
Edmond, OK
TDI
2014 Passat
What I’m trying to say is that we don’t need an “expert class” running the country. If there is a problem, it should be addressed by Congress. They are elected officials and can be held accountable for their actions. When they create these agencies and give them regulatory power, they give up their own authority to bureaucrats who aren’t accountable and can’t be voted out (the statist believe this is a feature not a bug).

I know there are specific areas of modern life that have to be regulated, like air traffic and safety. But look how many agencies there are and the scope of their power pretty much covers everything. So we now have a micromanaged society led by “experts” who manage to dumb down and ruin everything they touch, from gasoline cans to toilets, and even the diesel engine.
 

K5FAL

Active member
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Location
Edmond, OK
TDI
2014 Passat

lemoncurd

Veteran Member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Location
Eastern CT
TDI
2013 CJAA GTB2266
What I’m trying to say is that we don’t need an “expert class” running the country. If there is a problem, it should be addressed by Congress. They are elected officials and can be held accountable for their actions. When they create these agencies and give them regulatory power, they give up their own authority to bureaucrats who aren’t accountable and can’t be voted out (the statist believe this is a feature not a bug).

I know there are specific areas of modern life that have to be regulated, like air traffic and safety. But look how many agencies there are and the scope of their power pretty much covers everything. So we now have a micromanaged society led by “experts” who manage to dumb down and ruin everything they touch, from gasoline cans to toilets, and even the diesel engine.

mainly:
All that
backs today’s decision is the majority’s belief that Chevron
was wrong—that it gave agencies too much power and
courts not enough.
 

jmodge

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Location
Greenville, MI
TDI
2001 alh Jetta, RC2 w/.205's 5speed daily summer commuter and 2000 alh Jetta 5spd swap, 2" lift, hitch, stage 3 TDtuning w/.216's winter cruiser, 1996 Tacoma ALh
Actually there is a mechanism to hold them, not necessarily accountable, but in control. It's called money, because they don't make their own. Government can only force it's will upon those who can't afford to manipulate them.

As far as buying into statistics, back in the day there was a scholastic course named as such. The main message of this course was that you can use statistics to uphold as fact or disregard as fiction whatever you set your sights on, and there will always be parties that accept both arguments as truth.
 

gearheadgrrrl

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2002
Location
Buffalo Ridge (southwest Minnesota)
TDI
'15 Golf DSG, '13 JSW DSG surrendered to VW, '03 Golf 2 door manual
I don't think you're being fair to government employees in general and EPA employees in particular. I have 40 years in the FAA, and yes I am highly paid. And I don't have a degree of any kind. But I have a very specialized job that not everyone can do. The same applies to many government positions. And the ones that don't require special skills probably aren't even making $100k. My daughter is a state employee (working for one of the state universities) with a Masters from Cambridge and she barely makes $50k.
Been there, done that, got the TSP poor excuse for a pension. I've got no problem paying real scientists and engineers $100K+ for their expertise, but paying liberal arts majors that kind of $$$ for their opinions is unjustified.
 

turbodieseldyke

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Location
Free Mustache Rides
TDI
98 jetta
I wonder if they are going after the customers now too?
I don't believe it. I had ordered a DPF and EGR delete kit from Rawtek in Ontario on 8/20/24 and due to BO it was shipped 8/26/24 and arrived in New York on 8/28/24 and was intercepted by EPA and my order was returned to the Mfgr. Seems like the EPA police are on the warpath again...
 
Top