well today i took a bunch of logs with it plugged in vs with it unplugged and sent them to Mark Malone. I looked over the logs and the data was very interesting. I know this data will probably be different on a stock turbo setup but for a big turbo setup this was the findings. I will post some of the graphs once Mark looks over them and says i can. There is interesting difference between MAP values vs Boost Gauge Values with the boost gauge tapped into the manifold after the MAP sensor but before reaching the flapper assembly.
All logs where done on tune that was tailored around the flaps plugged in
Things that were different.
1) from 0-2000rpms there was a dramatic difference in boost response slowing onset
2) from 2600rpms to redline the graphs were basicly the same
3) from 2000rpms to 2600rpms the log with no flap motor had higher boost/ quicker onset slightly ( expect that when the flap motor is plugged in this is when the motor opens the valve and the disturbance in airflow causes the boost to dip slightly)
4) the tune was set to peak 31psi and the log with the flap valve plugged in peaked 31psi and held to red line.
5) the same tune set to peak 31psi but when the flap valve unplugged the peak power hit 28 and fluctuated between 27/28 to red line.
6) if i am understanding the MAF values correctly (NO PRO ON VCDS) the measurements where the exact same from 2600rpms to redline on the readings with only difference from 0-2600rpms.
So if i am reading all this correctly the engine consumed the same measurement of air from 2600 to redline but required less psi to reach these values with identical spool over rpms compared after 2600rpms
With the MAP values showing identical on the VCDS on both with and without the flapper valve plugged in from 2600+, but when the flaps unplugged the intake manifold values are lower in PSI makes me think the valves are really causing a pressure bottleneck
I am waiting on email back from Mark, But i am probably thinking with some adjustments.. the tune can be adjusted to compensate for the lagg in spool down low from the flap...
All logs where done on tune that was tailored around the flaps plugged in
Things that were different.
1) from 0-2000rpms there was a dramatic difference in boost response slowing onset
2) from 2600rpms to redline the graphs were basicly the same
3) from 2000rpms to 2600rpms the log with no flap motor had higher boost/ quicker onset slightly ( expect that when the flap motor is plugged in this is when the motor opens the valve and the disturbance in airflow causes the boost to dip slightly)
4) the tune was set to peak 31psi and the log with the flap valve plugged in peaked 31psi and held to red line.
5) the same tune set to peak 31psi but when the flap valve unplugged the peak power hit 28 and fluctuated between 27/28 to red line.
6) if i am understanding the MAF values correctly (NO PRO ON VCDS) the measurements where the exact same from 2600rpms to redline on the readings with only difference from 0-2600rpms.
So if i am reading all this correctly the engine consumed the same measurement of air from 2600 to redline but required less psi to reach these values with identical spool over rpms compared after 2600rpms
With the MAP values showing identical on the VCDS on both with and without the flapper valve plugged in from 2600+, but when the flaps unplugged the intake manifold values are lower in PSI makes me think the valves are really causing a pressure bottleneck
I am waiting on email back from Mark, But i am probably thinking with some adjustments.. the tune can be adjusted to compensate for the lagg in spool down low from the flap...
Last edited: