Is it more efficient to throw a std TDI into neutral and coast down a hill or to put it in a lower gear and coast that way? I've always assumed the former but someone recently proposed the theory that in gear is more efficient.
K, sorry, I'll look it upNB_TDi said:Ah man not again!
X CELL TDI said:Isn't it better and easier to asnwer the question asked instead of treating fellow members as if you get angry at them when they ask something that we all know? just because he owns a tdi doesn't means he knows everything i know theres a search feature but a simple answer like: hi everyman it is proven you will get better mpg if you coast in gear do it!. instead of burning him with this ones:
Been beat to death. Do a search. or the classic Ah man not again! we here to help not to treat fellow tdi owners like that my .02
Right but an answer like my man 40x40 up there was in order instead the "search it you fool" types I mean maybe he wasn't a member or maybe he didn't know about fred's 1-2-3-4-10 years ago when this question became something considered as a dead thread, i've seen often when a noob ask something simple to answer and gets search it! or not again! or man we discussed that X years ago, look at my member date up there feb 2010 but i been reading fred's since 2002 just became member because just got my tdi in feb 2010 always wanted one but always ended buying big vehicles and my project cars always where for drag, say <12 sec .25 miles but now im working on this tdi and man i was stupid not to get one back in 2002 i love my jettaDigital Corpus said:There are many a thread, and several long threads discussing the merits and disadvantages of each beyond the point where the phrase "beating a dead horse" becomes a cliche.
no im not and i was giving your answer the thumbs up i guess i type slow.........but i drive fast hehehe.. not trying to piss anybody off but i think i have a point, we are a club maybe more than that i think theres more knowledge on this site than in vw archives why? our members have put the miles, time and sweat to tdis and its not right to let a fellow member on their own when a simple question can be answered right on the spot if it was a technical question like say how do i change my clutch or how do i do my own tb that we can tell them search for that cuz theres a some step by step threads here.... i think we shoul help with simple things like that40X40 said:Are you from the vortex?Troll somewhere else.
Bill
Holy run-on sentences Batman!X CELL TDI said:no im not and i was giving your answer the thumbs up i guess i type slow.........but i drive fast hehehe.. not trying to piss anybody off but i think i have a point, we are a club maybe more than that i think theres more knowledge on this site than in vw archives why? our members have put the miles, time and sweat to tdis and its not right to let a fellow member on their own when a simple question can be answered right on the spot if it was a technical question like say how do i change my clutch or how do i do my own tb that we can tell them search for that cuz theres a some step by step threads here.... i think we shoul help with simple things like that
x2. To the OP, here is the link:NB_TDi said:There was a thread that happened not that long ago, I seem to remember name calling and harsh words.
Has nothing to do with nOObS asking the same questions, it's just the fact that this topic always ends the same.
Tec80 said:It is simple, really. Fuel burn rate at idle compared with the difference in decel rate in neutral vs. in-gear (with the drag of the trans/engine motoring via reverse power flow from wheels to crankshaft).
At the end of the coasting event, how much fuel would you need to burn to make up the speed you lost by leaving it in gear, and is that amount of fuel more than the fuel you burned idling for the duration of the coasting event?
We need someone to get the above data vs. pulling opinions out of a dark place.
Actually yours is a very reasoned approach. We have a pretty "real world" example. To go to and from Tahoe, CA, sea level to 7085 ft and return http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donner_Pass. Basically we get 3/4 mpg better on the "down hill". Down hill can be described as 150 miles or soTec80 said:It is simple, really. Fuel burn rate at idle compared with the difference in decel rate in neutral vs. in-gear (with the drag of the trans/engine motoring via reverse power flow from wheels to crankshaft).
At the end of the coasting event, how much fuel would you need to burn to make up the speed you lost by leaving it in gear, and is that amount of fuel more than the fuel you burned idling for the duration of the coasting event?
We need someone to get the above data vs. pulling opinions out of a dark place.
No contest is not really true. If you are slowing down while in gear then you will have to accellerate to get back up to speed. I have a 1/2 to 3/4 mile coast (in nuetral) every day coming into town. I start at 60 mph and let the car slow down to 45 mph and then 40 mph as the speed limit is posted. In gear I have to add throttle as not to impede traffic. You burn .3 of a gallon per hour at idle and none while decellerating in gear (you are not coasting if the engine is dragging speed off). My 45 second coast uses approximately half of an ounce of fuel, if I have to use the throttle 9 seconds to maintain speed (assuming 20 mpg on accelleration) I am using .9 of an ounce of fuel. Please check my figures as I may be wrong (after a 16 hour day at work). All I am saying is that it depends on what the circumstances are as to what is going to use the least fuel. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.RalphVa said:NO fuel use with car in gear and foot off accelerator. SOME fuel being used idling while coasting. NO CONTEST.
Also have more control with the car left in gear.
Ski in NC said:If descending a hill and you want to maximize speed at the bottom, and don't need to brake, then use neutral and coast.
If descending a hill and it is steep, or a curve at the bottom, or a stop at the bottom, leave in gear and let the engine brake at zero fuel.
If you find yourself using the brakes on the downhill, you should have engine in gear.
jimbobb2 said:The next question comes with the thoughts of upper cylinder lubrication. When in gear and the fuel shut off, you are not getting any upper cylinder lubrication. Is this causing any additional wear? I am sure that this is so little that you couldn't measure it, but I am thinking long term or if you had a long steep grade (such as the mountains). The next question is......does the fuel actually shut off when in gear? I rolled down a slight hill and let the clutch out in second to start my 10 Jetta. I never touched the throttle and pushed the clutch back in after a couple of seconds and the car was running. That seems to indicate that there is some fuel still going through the engine.