twoblink
Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2000
- Location
- Pasadena, CA USA
Big Oil\'s Conspiracy
I think the real problem is big oil.
Let's take a look at history; You have Pague's super fuel efficient carberators that get 200 miles per gallon. They took him out.
You have machines like the Verelex motors and they are keeping them down. You have things like the split cycle engines (www.splitcycle.com.au), a 1 litre engine gets 60 horses and something like 3000ft-lbs of torque!!!
We have superior technology, but we aren't using it. We have ways to design a car that will run for a few hundred miles a gallon. But what would that do to the oil business?? That's why they don't do it.
Consider the Jeep Wrangler... Toyota's engines as well as Honda's puts out 2x the horse power, is twices as fuel efficient even with twice the power output, yet look at Jeep. Is Honda and Toyota using technology yet unseen? VTEC's been around for years, so has dual overhead cam, and variable valve timing. We have superior fuel injectors as well that can get atomization roughly in the 90% area. Do we use them? No.
Buckminster Fuller built a "Bucky-car" that seated 9 people, got 40 miles per gallon, and with fullerene structures, they were very safe. That was in the 50's. So why do we still have cars like Kia's which is basically a cardboard on wheels in terms of safety?
It's all a big oil conspiracy and I'm sick of it.
So if any of you out there is a multi-millionaire and is sick of these big oil conspiracies, let me know. I have designs for building a car that:
1) Is safe enough to run head first into a Mack Truck and still survive
2) Get's probably triple digits in terms of mpg
I just don't have the money to build it...
Albert
I think the real problem is big oil.
Let's take a look at history; You have Pague's super fuel efficient carberators that get 200 miles per gallon. They took him out.
You have machines like the Verelex motors and they are keeping them down. You have things like the split cycle engines (www.splitcycle.com.au), a 1 litre engine gets 60 horses and something like 3000ft-lbs of torque!!!
We have superior technology, but we aren't using it. We have ways to design a car that will run for a few hundred miles a gallon. But what would that do to the oil business?? That's why they don't do it.
Consider the Jeep Wrangler... Toyota's engines as well as Honda's puts out 2x the horse power, is twices as fuel efficient even with twice the power output, yet look at Jeep. Is Honda and Toyota using technology yet unseen? VTEC's been around for years, so has dual overhead cam, and variable valve timing. We have superior fuel injectors as well that can get atomization roughly in the 90% area. Do we use them? No.
Buckminster Fuller built a "Bucky-car" that seated 9 people, got 40 miles per gallon, and with fullerene structures, they were very safe. That was in the 50's. So why do we still have cars like Kia's which is basically a cardboard on wheels in terms of safety?
It's all a big oil conspiracy and I'm sick of it.
So if any of you out there is a multi-millionaire and is sick of these big oil conspiracies, let me know. I have designs for building a car that:
1) Is safe enough to run head first into a Mack Truck and still survive
2) Get's probably triple digits in terms of mpg
I just don't have the money to build it...
Albert