buyingconstant7
Veteran Member
I have had scan gauges in pretty much all mine and some family members cars and always have the L/hr function set on. But in my 2013 Jetta TDI, the Litres per hour number is strangely high...
I just want to point out all numbers are up to operating temp. when the engines are idling in Park, or Neutral with no A/C or other load on the engine, as recorded on multiple scan gauges calibrated correctly to each vehicle.
My old 2001 Jetta TDI: 0.3l/hr
Moms "old" 2014 Tiguan: 0.7 l/hr
Moms new 2015 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel: 0.5 L/hr
My old 12v 2000 Jetta VR6: 1.0L/hr
2006 BRM Jetta TDI: 0.4L/hr(her MFI also says that).
But with my CR 2013 Jetta, the car itself says about 0.6L/hr on the display, but the scan gauge says a whopping 1.2L/hr when NOT regenning. Why is it so freaking high? And which number is correct on my Jetta, the 0.6 or the 1.2? Is that normal?
Even the 0.6 number seems high, especially considering my moms Tiguan burned 0.7l/hr when warm. What gives?!?
I just want to point out all numbers are up to operating temp. when the engines are idling in Park, or Neutral with no A/C or other load on the engine, as recorded on multiple scan gauges calibrated correctly to each vehicle.
My old 2001 Jetta TDI: 0.3l/hr
Moms "old" 2014 Tiguan: 0.7 l/hr
Moms new 2015 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel: 0.5 L/hr
My old 12v 2000 Jetta VR6: 1.0L/hr
2006 BRM Jetta TDI: 0.4L/hr(her MFI also says that).
But with my CR 2013 Jetta, the car itself says about 0.6L/hr on the display, but the scan gauge says a whopping 1.2L/hr when NOT regenning. Why is it so freaking high? And which number is correct on my Jetta, the 0.6 or the 1.2? Is that normal?
Even the 0.6 number seems high, especially considering my moms Tiguan burned 0.7l/hr when warm. What gives?!?
Last edited: