If the difference we're seeing is actually reflecting the "Post September 2015 Owner Adjustment" (to use the FTC Order's term)*, we should see one of two things:
1. All post-9/18/15 buyers see an equal, and greater than previously shown, but not 100%, percentage of the restitution; or
2. Owners who bought between 9/18/15 and 6/28/16 will see an equal, and greater, but less than 100%, percentage of the restitution; and owners who bought after 6/28/16 will see 100% of the restitution.
There shouldn't be any case where different owners are seeing different, non-100%, portions of the restitution. However, some in either this thread or a different one are suggesting that this is the case.
* I'd like to think this is the case. It would mean they're continuing to move things along smartly (even if not as quickly as we'd hope), and it would also mean good things for my own finances. But I'm skeptical. My A3, bought on 7 Oct 16, is showing very different results in my "main" claims portal account (78% restitution for buyback, 50% for fix) compared to a second account I just set up (100% for both). In the main account, it's showing a different result for the buyback than for the fix. If I change the expected mileage by one mile/month, the fix calculation changes to 78%. But if I change it back to where it was and tell the portal to recalculate, the "fix" restitution goes back to where it was, at 50%.