| TDI Power Enhancements Discussions about increasing the power of your TDI engine. i.e. chips, injectors, powerboxes, clutches, etc. Handling, suspensions, wheels, type discussion should be put into the "Upgrades (non TDI Engine related)" forum. Non TDI vehicle related postings will be moved or removed. Please note the Performance Disclaimer. |
April 9th, 2010, 13:11
|
#16
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hannover, Germany formerly Toronto & NY
|
Actually what is the min reqmt for RC5? If I get the 3bar map and the pp502s will that suffice at that point? I plan to put in the ebay FMIC too. Is 11mm pump and lift pump etc. not a reqmt for RC5 then? I'd rather not go with bigger pump. Can the pp502 deliver all the fuel needed, what is the down side with pp764? I know there were some injection response discussions between bigger and moderate nozzles. It seems Peter and Jeff prefer moderate nozzles.
__________________
'03 Jetta Wagon TDI, 150mph, 188BHP - 365 lbft, 170WHP Smoke free German Map, VNT 17/22, 11mm IP, 02M DRW 6speed, OMI, Lower IC pipes,FMIC, PD Lift Pump, 3bar map, ARL Sachs Upgraded/DMF, PP764s, CCV Filter, EGR delete, PD150 Intake, PD150 SRP, 2.5" DP with Magnaflow Cat & 2.5" Catback, R32 DSG Snorkel, PD150 Airbox/MAF, Custom Accordian, Ventectomy,Front/ Rear Fog, Euroswitch, 5 brake light mod, McNally EGT/Boost Gague, Scanguage II, thermometer, Hidden Hitch, LED tail lights, Koni Reds, Depo Proj
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 13:24
|
#17
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South of Boston
|
I'm not certain what Jeff is asking for these days, but I think it's bigger downpipe, no CAT, CCV bypass, and maybe a bigger intercooler, or at least better plumbing.
__________________
2002 Jetta wagon, 278K, RC6 and other stuff; 1993 Mercedes-Benz 300D 2.5, 190K; 1997 Passat, 253K; 2012 Golf, 15K; 1990 Miata, 66K. Principal, http://www.idparts.com
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 13:37
|
#18
|
|
Torque Addict
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego
Fuel Economy: low: 35 high: 56 avg: 42.0
|
I'd go with 11mm and PP764's (just don't trust/understand PP502's) with a lift pump on the fuel front. FMIC is always welcome, and a bigger maf housing with coupled large turbo inlet pipe should help. The requirements for RC5/6 are the same, minus rods (and maybe headporting).
Peter- I'm sure driving style has a lot to do with your engine still being alive. I think you could break it if you wanted to if you put the 11mm and some R520's in...
Last edited by Farfromovin; April 9th, 2010 at 13:41.
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 13:45
|
#19
|
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maine Coast
|
I'm probably responsible for Jeff's reluctance to offer the RC 6. I tended to over do it a bit. It was fun while it lasted. RC 5 was delightful and probably a better match!
Last edited by Sootman; April 9th, 2010 at 16:20.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:31.
|