GoFaster, I beg to differ with your assessment of Aaron's driving style as a significant factor in this failure.
Look at the way the engine was designed, specifically the torque curve. The torque peaks at around 1800-1900 RPM, much lower than a similar displacement gasser. I'm sure VW designed the engine to support that torque, ie: crank & rod bearings and transmission at RPMs reasonably below 1800 RPM. If not, there is a major engine design flaw, and that I doubt. A diesel engine is and always has been a source of low RPM torque, plain & simple. We have to stop letting our thinking in the TDI domain from being contaminated from our knowledge and experiences in the gasser domain.
Here are some tidbits from my VW Owners Manual:
"Drive in 5th gear for optimum fuel economy when cruising. However, if more acceleration is required (when passing, for example), shift down."
and
"
Upshifting early saves fuel and reduces engine noise.
Shift to the next lowest gear when engine RPM's drops below 1,500 RPM."
and
"
Avoid full throttle.
Accelerating gently reduces fuel consumption, engine wear, and does not disturb the environment."
and
"
Upshift as early as possible - do not drive at unnecessarily high engine speeds.
The highest fuel economy and the least disturbance to the environment are attained when you drive at low engine speeds and in the highest possible gear.
... Therefore, drive as often and as long as possible in the highest gear."
and
"
Downshift only when the engine is no longer running smoothly.
Depending on the transmission you have, you can normally drive in the highest gear at 25 to 37 MPH on flat land and still be able to accelerate."
and from the trailer towing section,
"
The cooling effect of the radiator fan cannot be increased by downshifting because fan speed is independent of engine speed. Therefore, when driving uphill, you can always drive in the highest possible gear with low engine speed. "
The altitude makes this turbo problem happen, and apparently the VNT has some altitude sickness. HA! I just crack myself up!!!!
Turbo Hypoxia!!!!
Here is a partial summation of all that has gone on regarding this altitude induced turbo failure situation:
</font><ul type="square">[*]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">At altitude, the PR is greater for a given mass flow rate. At lower engine RPM, this puts the compressor operating point closer to or further into the surge regime.</font>[*]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Greater turbo RPMs are required. This disturbs the charge air flow on the low pressure side of the compressor blades causing premature flow/boundary layer separation, which leads to surge.</font>[*]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Turbo overspeed, which the control system has been designed to attempt to avoid, is far more likely if not guaranteed at altitude if the compressor goes into surge. The compressor will already be at much higher speed for a given boost level at altitude than at sea level. If the compressor goes into surge, it unloads since it is still being driven hard by the turbine. The turboshaft will increase in RPM at an incredibly fast rate, overspeed, and experience abnormally high stresses. Hoop stresses for one. The compressor can deform and contact the housing. Overspeed also imposes stresses in the wheel in certain directions that could be in excess of the fatigue limit stresses. The wheel eventually blows the next time it overspeeds, or the repeated overstressing fatigues the wheel allowing it to deform more than before and it contacts the housing. These stresses are non-linear, that is they increase very fast with small increase in turbo RPM, and even greater at higher RPM levels. </font>[/list]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">As far as bigger or smaller wheel is concerned, the folks at altitude need a wheel that can spin, hold off pressure at high PR with low charge air flow, and make the boost. The turbo RPM duty cycle at altitude will be, make that
is, far more severe than at sea level.
If driving style were that important, GT15's should be failing similarly, but they aren't or at least we haven't been made aware of it.
The VNT appears to have hypoxia. If I were at altitude, I would be adjusting the VNT so that the max. boost VNT mech position yielded nozzles that were a bit bigger to reduce the boost at low engine RPM.
The hypoxia results in overspeed. The wheel is then overstressed resulting in wheel fatigue. It eventually goes, taking out a bunch of other parts in the process.
That's my story, and I'm sticking with it, until somebody comes up with something better.
[ March 29, 2002, 18:08: Message edited by: Boundless ]