TDI Fuel Economy Discussions about increasing the fuel economy of your TDI engine. Non TDI related postings will be moved or removed. |
November 24th, 2007, 22:31
|
#1
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Flower Mound TX
|
Misinformation about effect of temp on MPG?
Ok, question for you gurus...
In my brief esperience with my TDI, I have observed something which seems to counter popular wisdom here on this board.
The conventional wisdom is "warmer air equals better mileage."
I've observed the opposite...as the temps have fallen (from a high of about 95F to 35F), my MPGs have climbed from the low 40s to around 50, under otherwise identical driving conditions (highway, 73-75mph).
And there is one big "problem" in my mind with the warmer air=better MPG idea. Why do we have intercoolers? TDI's never generate enough boost for the temp to REALLY get up there, and detonation is not a problem as in gas engines, and gas engines of similar boost levels have been sold without intercoolers...so why do we have them? Germans are pretty good engineers, and accountants too...they wouldn't needlessly put an intercooler in these cars if it did not have a positive effect on HP or MPG.
And if warmer air helped MPG, why isn't bypassing the intercooler a common hypermiler-mod? In fact, it's the opposite...keeping it clean and efficient is routine maintenance for the economy-minded.
Sure sure, there is the air density argument...but I'm really having a hard time wrapping my head around the idea that it's a significant difference. And at city-driving speeds, where wind resistance isn't a huge factor, any difference would be futher marginalized.
And as for the colder temps = less rolling resistance, intuitively, I think that would be the exact opposite since colder temps=harder tires and road surface, and harder tires usually means better MPG.
Ok, so fuel is reformulated in colder temps for gelling reasons, but that's not directly a temperature effect...it's indirect. I suspect this is the main..if not ONLY...culprit here.
<flame suit ON>
|
|
|
November 24th, 2007, 22:46
|
#2
|
Experienced
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City area, MO
Fuel Economy: TBD, new data forthcoming
|
You're kinda going off in all directions there... but I can say that my car likes temps around 60F with small excursions in either direction having little effect. Once you get to 30F or 85F bad things happen to the average MPG though...
Don't underestimate the VW engineers... they gave us one of the most fuel efficient cars ever seen in mass production.
JMO.
Bill
__________________
www.IHMSA.ORGhttp://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=Xtsxt7xgbpc
If you omit pertinent info from your question, you cannot reasonably expect a good answer.//Not affiliated with any vendors except as a customer.// Wise people lurk more.// I'm not a guru.// 'I got actual real friends in the real world'-T'sTDI/ If you were the only entry, there wasn't a race.// Grammar and spelling really are important, but I don't claim to be good at it.// Typical drivers can't.
|
|
|
November 24th, 2007, 23:36
|
#3
|
Veteran Member
|
Ever start up a TDi when it is around 0 degrees? it isn't pretty. The car sounds rattly and until it warms up, it is loud.
Until it is warmed up, a tdi can get some pretty poor mpg. I read somewhere that Bosch figured it could get as low 16mpg when it is real cold, during the time it takes to warm up.
Also, all the fluids, fro the oil in the engine, fluid in the tranny, even the grease in the wheels bearings, get thick and it takes more energy to move.So, if you are in a cold area, this all gets factored into why winter mpg drops and that's not even touching the issue of winter fuel.
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 03:13
|
#4
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Newtownards, N. Ireland
Fuel Economy: 38.5- 47 Forester, Citroen 55- 63
|
Yup. And re. intercoolers, at 1.1bar, turbo outlet temps are 100c or worse...
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 08:37
|
#5
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Flower Mound TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dclark
Ever start up a TDi when it is around 0 degrees? it isn't pretty. The car sounds rattly and until it warms up, it is loud.
Until it is warmed up, a tdi can get some pretty poor mpg. I read somewhere that Bosch figured it could get as low 16mpg when it is real cold, during the time it takes to warm up.
Also, all the fluids, fro the oil in the engine, fluid in the tranny, even the grease in the wheels bearings, get thick and it takes more energy to move.So, if you are in a cold area, this all gets factored into why winter mpg drops and that's not even touching the issue of winter fuel.
|
Ok, that makes sense. MPG is not optimum until the car is up to operating temp, and in extreme cold temps that can easily take enough time to have an impact on overall MPG.
But once the engine IS at operating temps, I still think colder air = better MPG/efficiency/power/etc.
Part of my reasoning for starting this thread is I've noticed (from my scangauge) that as temps have dropped, my IATs have dropped to just below 60deg F. This has corresponded with my increased MPG, and it's the only factor I can attribute to the increased economy. I believe there is a pretty direct relationship here, and it's easy to test. Just accelerating briskly will bring the IATs up into the 70-80 degree range. I then return to "cruise" and see a corresponding drop in MPG. As the intercooler cools off and the IATs fall back to the 60 deg range, the MPG climbs back up. This got me thinking about water injection and more efficient intercoolers. So i started searching old threads, where I ran across a few posts making the hotter air=better MPG claim.
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 09:39
|
#6
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
|
Cooler air into the engine is generally good for thermal efficiency.
Colder air increases aerodynamic drag on the car.
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 17:11
|
#7
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego
|
I'm no expert at cars, but I always thought of it this way.
The colder air is more dense, so you get more molecules of air into the combustion chamber at a specific boost pressure than at a higher temperature. In essence cooler air acts like a slightly higher boost - without an actual increase in boost pressure. Unfortunately like all things engineering, there is a point where the colder intake temperature is no longer an advantage, but extracts a performance penalty. As the air gets colder, some of the thermal energy of the combustion will be expended to increase the temperature of the incoming air. The result is a slight decrease in performance, which is manifested as lower MPG.
I'm not sure if this actually the case, so if there are any experts, please correct me.
__________________
2006 Platinum Grey Pkg 1
5 speed >> 35.8 min / 44.5 avg / 50.7 high
45,000 Miles
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 17:43
|
#8
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Conkud, New Hampshiyuh, USA
Fuel Economy: pretty freakin' good.
|
In general, there is very nearly a 1:1 correspondence between the heat taken out of the intake air by the intercooler, and the lowering of the exhaust temperature. How it translates is that an intercooler allows lower thermodynamic stress on the engine.
You get an intercooler when the engineers win over the accountants in the head office. Sometimes accountants sign on for preventative engineering when they look at warranty costs.
When I have been driving up a canyon in the sinter to go skiing, I'm really glad I have an intercooler there, even though the outside air is very cold. Lots of work being done on cold air by the turbocharger, and when the air is thin, the turbo can heat it up a lot as it works even harder.
My mileage plummets here in Phoenix in the summer, and it isn't completely because of running the a/c. Excessive heat causes its own difficulties.
Likewise, my mileage isn't the best in the winter, either. The best time is during moderate weather in the spring and fall when I don't have to run a/c or heat.
__________________
You always pay for what you get. Sometimes you get what you pay for.
It is called dope because it does make you dumb.
Thinking outside the box is difficult for some. They're afraid they'll fall off the edge of the box and be lost to oblivion.
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 18:08
|
#9
|
Grammar Scout
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DFWDieselJet
The conventional wisdom is "warmer air equals better mileage."
|
Can you cite one example of "conventional wisdom"? To me conventional wisdom is cold air is denser. Dense air has more O2. More O2 makes things more efficient.
__________________
[Review]: ECS Mk4 Rear Hatch Pop Kit. 0/5 stars for Rear Hatch Popping. 5/5 stars for inflicting head trauma.
It's all just cheap chinese **** with a fancy vortex bling bling spin that attracts people
|
|
|
November 25th, 2007, 18:52
|
#10
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Freetown,Ma.
Fuel Economy: Worst 43+ Best 56.1 Avg. 45-46
|
Don't forget the effects of winterized fuel.
__________________
"I did choose to work for this car brand because their German Engineer does not follow and this cars are unique in designed."
“Your lack of Oink Oink shows that you are Dazed and Confused as the biggest content in your reply, I had authored .”
99.5 Jetta, whitish.
|
|
|
November 26th, 2007, 03:59
|
#11
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Williamstown, Mass
|
As with the A/C running during 85*+ weather, extra load (rear defog, heater motor, longer GP time, longer crank time, etc.) in cold weathe means more drag from the alternator, which will take some of the MPGs away, but probably not too much.
|
|
|
November 26th, 2007, 06:11
|
#12
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Its only dropped to about 33F here, and my TDI is "rattly" sounding in the mornings. I have noticed (though all my "good upgrades" have happened since it started getting cold, too) that my economy is better now in the winter.
__________________
14 TDI Beetle: the grey lemon.
|
|
|
November 26th, 2007, 06:50
|
#13
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Rawdon, Nova Scotia
|
The one thing you could say for the better fuel economy in warm weather is that the fuel expands with increasing temperature, and because the fuel is injected by volume, you would do better. That said, the fuel is heated up in the pump, so any gain is marginal.
I am with you on the better economy with colder weather, but when you get winterised fuel, the gains go down the drain, because it then has more kerosine in it and thus less energy.
Hans
|
|
|
November 26th, 2007, 07:36
|
#14
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Carolina
Fuel Economy: 45 to 50 mpg with my foot in it.
|
air temp
FWIW, and keep in mind I am no engineer by any stretch but in my experience racing, we can dyno a car straight off with only letting teh motor get up to temp, then we canlet it cool down but this time we will let it run in gear on teh dyno to get up to temp. When we let the car run on the dyno heating all the fluids there is always a significant increase in hp. Take it at face value but that has been my experience..and this was done in 100 degree south carolina weather
__________________
03 Silver Jetta New southbend stg3, now time to install that lift pump and get a larger hair dryer!
|
|
|
November 26th, 2007, 08:06
|
#15
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodejetta
The one thing you could say for the better fuel economy in warm weather is that the fuel expands with increasing temperature, and because the fuel is injected by volume, you would do better. ....
Hans
|
It doesn't work that way.
If the fuel is denser, it has more energy per volume so we use less of it (by volume) to do the same amount of work.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23.
|