A company in the U.K. is selling complete '
industrial'
TDI engines, complete with the ECU, injection pump, etc. They say these engines are mechanically similar to the automotive engines but with some tuning modifications and a change in the rated power and torque figures to optimise the engine for its role. Allow me to quote a synopsis of the ad here; but I'm arranging to have the ad scanned into a graphic file for those who may be interested in learning more about these motors. "About a year and a half ago, Volkswagen presented the
industrial version of its four-cylinder, 1.9L
TDI diesel engine, derived from the turbocharged/intercooled, DI automotive diesel now used in many
VW cars. Following intensive development work, the company has now presented the new 'AFD'
industrial version for the 1.9L
TDI engine. The AFD has modified pistons and fuel injection system, allowing it to meet Euro 2 emissions limits, Volkswagen states. While power and torque can be readily adapted to specific applications via software changes at the EDC electronic injection control system, maximum power, maximum torque and rated readily adapted to specific applications via software changes at the EDC electronic injection control system, maximum power, maximum torque and rated speeds have been optimized to
industrial applications. Standard ratings of the AFD diesel are hence 60kW @ 3300 rpm, compared to the 66 kW @ 4000 rpm rating of the automitive engine at its launch, with peak torque now at 205 Nm @ 1800 rpm intead of 202 Nm @ 1900 rpm of the original specification. Volkswagen reports that the AFD engine has been tested for emissions by the TUV Essen technical inspectorate. The official tests gave particulate emission levels of 0.24 g/kWh and NOx levels of 6.53 g/kWh. Minimum specific fuel consumption is quoted at just over 207 g/kWh. The
TDI industrial engine employs a Bosch fuel injection pump with EDC electronic control and producing injection pressures of 800 to 900 bar. Standard equipment includes a wiring loom and all necessary sensors for the electronic control unit. The AFD diesel retains the cylinder block of Volkswagen's earlier ADE 1.9L IDI
industrial diesel, with bore and stroke of 79.5 x 95.5 m, giving a swept volume of 1896 cc. Crankshaft bearings were optimized to reduce noise and cope with the DI engine's higher power output, the company notes." Marshall's
Industrial Ltd. Hithercroft Road, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 9DG Tel: 01491 834666 Fax: 01491 839777 --------------
Martin.Schulte@Pironet.de TDI pages Hi Martin, Thanks for an informative WWW page about what's needed to swap a 1.9l
TDI into a T3. I thought you might be interested in knowing about the
VW diesel mailing list. You can subsecribe by: Send mail to:
wclistserve@velocity.bc.ca In the message body enter: subscribe VWDieselL or for digest mode: subscribe
vw-diesel Your page generated quite some interest, and I posted an attempt to English translation to the list. Do you mind if I put the translation on the WWW? I was curious if you could avoid the special left motor mount in any way. Was the 1.9
TDI ever installed in longitudinal (la"ngeweise?) position, like the 1.6 TD in the old Passats and Audis? Those had a different manifold with the turbo out of the way from the motor mount. Is there a problem both with KKK and Garett turbos? Last year a friend put a 1.9TD with a KKK turbo in a T3 with the original mount. He said that on the 1.9 TD the KKK turbo was much smaller than the Garett. Cheers, Martin --------------- > I recall from looking at the brake specific fuel consumption > (efficiency) plots of engine RPMs vs load settings with bsfc > "contours", that the 1.6l TD has about the same peak efficiency as the > normally aspirated versions. However, there is a significantly > broader "plateau" where this peak resides at. So in many driving > scenarios with the turbo it should actually give a little bit of > improved fuel economy. This has been my experience as well - I got > around 40 mpg with my old normally aspirated 1.6l diesel but have been > seeing increased fuel economy on my turbo - even though it's probably > able to kick out around double the power of the normally aspirated. Like you say above, the engine efficiency varies with operating conditions. Just to be more specific, The peak efficiency occurs at a particular rpm AND load. Generally the rpm is somewhere near the torque peak, and the load is pretty near full load (like 50-70% or so). For the
VW diesel if I remeber right the rpm is about 2000 and the load MEP (Mean Effective Pressure) 6MPa I think. For a NA Diesel the efficiency drops dramatically near the the smoke limit. In a TD the turbo pumps more air the higher the load, so you don't "hit a wall" like the smoke limit of the NA engine, and the efficiency curve generally is flatter up to higher MEP's. In principle the addition of a turbo can also move the peak efficiency rpm, but in practice that seems to be less of an effect than the MEP. > I'm seeing about 44 mpg average on my audi-intercooled 1.6l TD, but I'm > quite sure it's running rich at certain points the way I have the injection > pump setup (it could probably benefit from fine-tuning) Peak efficiency occurs at 45 mph in 5th gear in my Quantum. Clearly I drive faster than that. At around 3000rpm (70-75 mph) i get about 45 mpg (40 with a canoe on top). This was with the old 2" exhaust, missing muffler. I'll be looking to see if I have a drop in mpg with the new one (both resonator and muffler, and it has a (short) 1.5" section). For comparison the Quantum is heavier (a few hundred lbs) than the A1 and A2 cars (but about the same as an A3 at 2600lbs), but is longer and more streamlined (less air drag). EPA mpg I think is 40/44. For entertainment I played with calculating the theoretical mpg figures for my Diesel Westy based on engine specific efficiency and measured drag figures. At normal road speed calculated mpg comes quite close to actual measured. Also interesting: if you drive the camper van at peak efficiency you could in theory get 60mpg! (This corresponds to about 30-35mph in 4th steady state, no hills, no wind, no speed changes) Needless to say I haven't tried that. There aren't any long hill less roads here. The calculations is on one of my WWW pages. > I wonder if someone stuck a 200 g/kWh
TDI motor in a Rabbit (
VW IDI diesels > are more peaked at around 260 g/kWh) how much the actual mileage figures > would improve? You'd likely have to change the tranny ratios to get the low gearing needed for peak eff MEP. > Also I wonder how good the figures could get with a > re-engineered IDI diesel (there may be just a few more tweaks I have in > mind!
The newer VE pumps (like on the 1.9l TD I just bought) have a load dependent timing solenoid. That should give some twiddle room. Basic principle is to advance timing at high loads to give more time to pump in and burn the larger fuel quantity. Unfortunately I don't have the control module. Anyone know of a wrecked 1995 or later TD car I could get the module from? Cheers, Martin