www.tdiclub.com

Economy - Longevity - Performance
The #1 Source of TDI Information on the Web!
Forums Articles Links Meets
Orders TDI Club Cards TDIFest 2016 Gone, but not forgotten VAG-Com List Unit Conversions TDIClub Chat Thank You

Order your TDIClub merchandise and help support TDIClub


Go Back   TDIClub Forums > VW TDI Discussion Areas > TDI Fuel Economy

TDI Fuel Economy Discussions about increasing the fuel economy of your TDI engine. Non TDI related postings will be moved or removed.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 8th, 2014, 13:19   #61
Enabled
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_Fout View Post
Compared to what previous temps? A/C usage more?
I had best mileage in the late winter/early spring (~70 degrees F). In fact I was even able to hit 50mpg even during a drive from Aspen Colorado to Houston, TX during the Polar Vortex blizzard in late December (0-10 degrees F), on winter tires (only Houstonian with winter wheels available??), but at max 50mph due to conditions.

But it has been steadily declining since then, as it was warming up. I was able to keep 47mpg tank average for a while in the spring, but then it declined. My last tank was 43mpg even though I was trying to shift at 2000 rpm when possible, in a small attempt to keep it up. I still drive with a heavy foot reaching 85mph often, but I haven't changed that. Obviously I've been using AC more, but 3-4 mpg? Maybe that's normal in addition to my heavy foot driving.

I have .681 gears as well.

The car makes good power (as good as it's gonna get with PP520's and VCDS tweaking) low smoke on WOT, and monitoring in VCDS for engine health is very good (per cylinder IQ deviation is good, everything else is normal)

I'll try MAF cleaning and connector servicing, other than that, all filters are new, and all fluids in powerline/driveline are new.
__________________
-2003 Jetta TDI GLS Manual (Mods: SBC II Daily, .681 5th, VNT17 & PP520, Self Tuned)
-BMW 328is Manual (heavily modded 220whp, track toy)
-BMW Z3 Roadster (Fun in the sun car)
-BMW Z3 M Coupe (1 of 36)
-BMW 328d wagon (Self tuned ~230hp)
Enabled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 8th, 2014, 15:59   #62
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default

Slowly decreasing tire pressure? I know mine has been slowly creeping down from 45 psi in the spring to 42 psi two weeks ago. Now the dealer 'corrected' the pressure at the 30k service, and I reset it to 42 psi.
__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2014, 04:42   #63
ksing44
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southeast PA
Default

My winter plunge in mpg every January- February is quite obvious with a lifetime fuelly graph. I climbed out of the hole very nicely so far this year, but unfortunately I'll be descending any time now as we go into autumn in Pennsylvania. I have to admit there is also a contribution from holiday vacation time and a little less commuting around the end of the year, but my trends in mpg are clearly affected by temperature. Last winter was cold for longer than normal and my mpg was lower for longer too!


from Flickr


PS: I run my big fat 235/45/17 Grand Touring All-season tires at 33 psi and still averaged just over 40 mpg for almost 100K miles. And that's not even taking into account that my mpg is actually just a bit better because my speedometer/odometer is off by about 1.4% with my bigger tires. I don't understand how some of you guys can stand driving with such hard tires for maybe a teeny weeny bit of difference in mpg. It must be so noisy and uncomfortable too.
__________________
2010 Golf TDI - (BGM), 4-Dr, 6-M, Sunroof, Xenon, Dynaudio, Nav (RNS-510), Euro light switch, 9W7 BT, R Tinted LED Tail Lights, Monte Carlo 17" x 7.5" ET47 Wheels, 235/45/17 Tires, P3Cars Digital Interface, Sonniboy sunshades, CP3 HPFP: 11/8/2016 @139,848 miles, The Fix: 9/27/17 @153,289 miles

Flickr slideshow

Last edited by ksing44; August 31st, 2014 at 12:44.
ksing44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 07:40   #64
SkeeterMark
Veteran Member
 
SkeeterMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Branch, MN
Fuel Economy: See Sig
Default

Here's another chart to demonstrate the effects of temperature (red line). Note the last entry... we had a cool week during my last tank and you can already see the drop in mpg. Note there are no additives for winter in the fuel yet. I believe the effect of winterizing additives is also minimal, in comparison to just the temperature alone.

Also, MN went to B10 in July, and there does not appear to be a noticeable difference - in fact I had my record mpg on it.

Also in this graph, the green line is what my MFD reports, compared to actual calculated mpg (blue).




*Temperatures are calculated by taking the start and end temp of each drive, and weighted for the mileage of that trip to get and average temperature while the car was in use. I used to just take a daily average temperature off accuweather, but I'm too anal to do that, though the variance in the two methods (don't ask how I know) is usually negligible because my drive to and from work actually coincides with the low and high temperatures for most days.
__________________
[URL="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/TDISkeeter/jetta"][IMG]http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/172184.png

Last edited by SkeeterMark; September 18th, 2014 at 07:47.
SkeeterMark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 08:07   #65
whitedog
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Default

What a bunch of geeks. It's what we expect and love here.
__________________
Can rent movies at BlockBuster.
whitedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 08:23   #66
SkeeterMark
Veteran Member
 
SkeeterMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Branch, MN
Fuel Economy: See Sig
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitedog View Post
What a bunch of geeks. It's what we expect and love here.
ain't that the truth.
__________________
[URL="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/TDISkeeter/jetta"][IMG]http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/172184.png
SkeeterMark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 15:01   #67
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default

Super, more plots!

Mark, if you stretch the MPG/MFD vertical axis a bit (maybe by chopping off zero, and running it from 30 to 60 mpg) then one could see the variations in mpg better.
__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 15:54   #68
puntmeister
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Arizona
Default

Haven't had time to read through the whole thread yet, so this may have already been addressed, but my 2 cents:

"Temperature" needs to be specified as to the temperature of what. And it needs to include air pressure & air density as well.

As the engine is warmer, it operates more efficiently. Clear enough - warmer engine temp = better mpg.

As air temperature goes up, air density typically goes down. Less dense air would genearally result in less efficient engine operations.

Of course, as air density goes up, so does aerodynamic drag.

It all gets too complicated for me, as I am not an engineer by any stretch - I am just applying what I have learned & experienced from flying airplanes (where temperature, air pressure, and air density all have noticable impacts on a plane's operations).
puntmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 15:59   #69
puntmeister
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Arizona
Default

As for the lower MPG in winter in Pennsylvania - could be several issues here, only indirectly related to temperature:

1) Winter diesel formulas, which, everyone seems to be certain of, are less energy dense than summer formulas.

2) I've been to Pennsylvania during many winters: lots of snow. Snow on the roads results in more sporatic driving - more stop & starting, driving in first & second gear, etc - which may lead to lower MPG.

In response to another post: AC uses a hoopload of power. I've done VCDS logs to determine fuel consumption of AC at various speeds - .6 liters/hour, at whatever speed. I also ran the numbers as MPG at various speeds - with/without AC - my logs showed a much bigger hit than 3 or 4 mpg - if I remember correctly, more like 6 mpg - but that varies. Consumption per hour doesn't. Of course, I'm in Arizona - so, when the AC is running, its running full-on.

Last edited by puntmeister; September 18th, 2014 at 16:04.
puntmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2014, 21:06   #70
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default

Welcome to the thread! I include a few answers below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puntmeister View Post
Haven't had time to read through the whole thread yet, so this may have already been addressed, but my 2 cents:
"Temperature" needs to be specified as to the temperature of what. And it needs to include air pressure & air density as well.
Absolutely! I'm talking about air temperature. Somewhere in the beginning I specify where I get my temperatures from. Air pressure doesn't vary so much seasonally where I live. I think that's true for most of Earth. Density is inverse proportional to (absolute) temperature; somewhere in the early posts I realized it varied by 7 or 8 percent between winter and summer in my area (upper Midwest). Huge factor for highway driving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puntmeister View Post
As the engine is warmer, it operates more efficiently. Clear enough - warmer engine temp = better mpg.
For me warmup is a small fraction of my driving. Of course this can be very different for others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puntmeister View Post
As air temperature goes up, air density typically goes down. Less dense air would genearally result in less efficient engine operations.
My car has a turbo and a little computer that tells it what inlet manifold pressure it would like to see. (Most here do on the TDI forum... :-) ) As long as the turbo doesn't reach its rpm limit, it will compensate for atmospheric air pressure changes. That's why people at higher altitude really like these turbo diesels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puntmeister View Post
Of course, as air density goes up, so does aerodynamic drag.
Absolutely! For me this factor alone (air drag change multiplied by my highway fraction) is sufficient to explain most of my summer winter mpg difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by puntmeister View Post
It all gets too complicated for me, as I am not an engineer by any stretch - I am just applying what I have learned & experienced from flying airplanes (where temperature, air pressure, and air density all have noticable impacts on a plane's operations).
The trickiest part is good record keeping. Anybody can learn how to do that.
__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2014, 06:27   #71
SkeeterMark
Veteran Member
 
SkeeterMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Branch, MN
Fuel Economy: See Sig
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesl View Post
Super, more plots!

Mark, if you stretch the MPG/MFD vertical axis a bit (maybe by chopping off zero, and running it from 30 to 60 mpg) then one could see the variations in mpg better.
Ya, that chart has the temp charted in there too, so it makes the vertical scale pretty tall.

But here's a chart of just the mileage (blue line). The red line plot is what you would have to achieve for mileage in a gasoline fueled vehicle, based on the prices I paid for diesel at each fill and the price for RUG at the same station at the time of that fill. It still shows the ups and downs of the seasons, which anyone in a cold weather climate will see.

__________________
[URL="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/TDISkeeter/jetta"][IMG]http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/172184.png
SkeeterMark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2014, 06:30   #72
SkeeterMark
Veteran Member
 
SkeeterMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Branch, MN
Fuel Economy: See Sig
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesl View Post
Absolutely! For me this factor alone (air drag change multiplied by my highway fraction) is sufficient to explain most of my summer winter mpg difference.
This factor would be equal for gassers and diesels, correct?
__________________
[URL="http://www.fuelly.com/driver/TDISkeeter/jetta"][IMG]http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/172184.png
SkeeterMark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2014, 12:44   #73
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default

Air drag should be identical for identical car body shape at the same speed.
__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 29th, 2014, 15:52   #74
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default

Updated post #5 with fall/winter 2014/15 chart. 40% done with gaspod experiment; so far no significant gain or loss in diesel mileage visible.


Histogram of diesel MPG with pods on and pods off (rear placement):


I moved the pods forward after three tanks full in this position, to be more in line with recommended placement.


For comparison, here are the histograms for two Golf TDIs with significant improvement due to gaspods:
data from http://www.gaspods.com/wp-content/up...W-Golf-TDI.pdf


GaryTDI's Golf:
data from http://www.fuelly.com/car/volkswagen...GaryTDI/144378

__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!

Last edited by Diesl; January 27th, 2015 at 07:18.
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 27th, 2015, 00:06   #75
Diesl
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Default Gaspod MPG vs Temperature

Same plot, for the gaspods placed 8" forward from the end of the roof:


Histogram of diesel MPG with pods on and pods off for the 8" forward placement:


So far this does not look much better than the rear placement; a significantly positive (or negative) result seems unlikely. Maybe the pods don't do much for the longer wagon, with the standard equipment roof rails. They clearly seem to work for the standard Golf TDI.
ADDED April 5, 2015: After six tanks without pods and five with, there is no significant difference in diesel mileage. The top graph shows that both sets (with and without pods) cover the same air temperature range, with similar temperature distributions.

August 2, 2015: Final verdict: the pods are not working for my Jetta Sportwagon. I'm suspecting that the roof rails create enough of a disturbance to fill in the pressure hole behind the hatch. I'm going to track mileage with the rails as-is and filled in (with styrofoam inserts).
__________________
If it works, take it apart and find out why!

Last edited by Diesl; August 2nd, 2015 at 21:28.
Diesl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'13 TDI Wagon - Poor MPG - 10 mpg less than avg TDI in ATX TDI Fuel Economy 41 November 10th, 2019 04:40
Does regen cycle cause AC temperature increase? dee74 VW Passat Family (NMS and B7) TDIs (2012+) 3 July 27th, 2013 18:13
Close to 10% increase in mileage! kilo69 Atlantic Canada 2 March 25th, 2009 12:38
10% HP and Torque increase in 30mins??? Link977 TDI Power Enhancements 16 February 9th, 2008 10:30
Product discussion: 10% ~ 40% increase in MPG FuelBoost TDI Fuel Economy 199 September 8th, 2006 19:27


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 18:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright - TDIClub Online LTD - 2017
Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Forum Rules | Disclaimer
TDIClub Online Ltd (TDIClub.com) is not affiliated with the VWoA or VWAG and is supported by contributions from viewers like you.
1996 - 2017, All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.18607 seconds with 11 queries
[Output: 143.95 Kb. compressed to 121.60 Kb. by saving 22.35 Kb. (15.52%)]