@Dieselpower04 Not that the 2260VK is at all restrictive, but I thought the 2056VK was a better fit. Around here, I'm not gonna put the power down much, so maybe just a slightly quicker spooling turbo than the 2260 made sense. I wanted to hit the 200 for sure, so that's why I didn't get the 1756vk. Wanted the room for EMP and all that too.
Well, maybe your cylinder head is just that good. I wouldn't think that the GTB2056vk would be the choke point at 230 dynojet-hp... If I can ever get my 17/22 to die, I gotta pick a nice replacement and this turbo is on the list. From your description so far, it seems to spool quicker than the 17/22!
The reason the turbine is a "restriction" is because the intake side is flowing so well with the cam and ported head? Does that make sense to anyone? I'm just trying to relay what Matt was telling me. So maybe not really a restriction, just a very well performing head.
Turbo spools quicker than the 1856 for sure from what Matt says. Sprocket has a 17/22 in his b4 and he needed new undergarments after driving it.
@Matt-AHU Matt, it will be good have you out this way to take care of it if need be =). Maybe I'll have it by the time you do Digital Corpus' TB. Just think, you're just a turbo away with your a3.