blackbodypie
Well-known member
Just wanted to post my findings on the size difference between these two sets of brakes. Just going by diameter and thickness is misleading because the pad size is much larger on the 288mm set and the contact patch is much more of the 288mm rotor than it is of the 280mm rotor. Here's a pic of the two rotors side by side:
Not only is the rusty rotor bigger but the contact patch extends further towards the center.
I also did a quick volume comparison using measurements from these two rotors. The 280mm rotor has a 51mm contact patch width and 6mm one sided thickness. The 288mm rotor has a 69mm contact patch and 8mm one sided thickness. Assuming the centre parts of each rotor are of comparable volume and the volume of the fins is negligible, the 288mm system adds about 0.3 L (litres) of metal to the rotor, about the volume of a can of coke. To put that into perspective: according to my calculations, the contact patch of the 280mm rotor has a volume of about 0.45 L. Just for completeness, the contact patch of the 288mm rotor is about 0.75 L (again according to my calculations).
Not only is the rusty rotor bigger but the contact patch extends further towards the center.
I also did a quick volume comparison using measurements from these two rotors. The 280mm rotor has a 51mm contact patch width and 6mm one sided thickness. The 288mm rotor has a 69mm contact patch and 8mm one sided thickness. Assuming the centre parts of each rotor are of comparable volume and the volume of the fins is negligible, the 288mm system adds about 0.3 L (litres) of metal to the rotor, about the volume of a can of coke. To put that into perspective: according to my calculations, the contact patch of the 280mm rotor has a volume of about 0.45 L. Just for completeness, the contact patch of the 288mm rotor is about 0.75 L (again according to my calculations).