Sandhopper
Well-known member
Mine has dropped down to the average level for my 55k check. See what I get for the 60k change interval. Either way, not too worried a
About excessive wear at this point.
About excessive wear at this point.
So you are in effect keeping your engine in cleaning mode twice as much as you should and never allow the protection of the additive packs to fully adhere to the internal parts and are wondering about wear metals showing up in a UOA?FWIW the oil in this last sample was Pentosin Super Perf III 507 spec oil and this car has never went beyond 6,000 miles on an oil change. It has received the dealer supplied Castrol Oil at the 10,000, 20,000 and 30,000 mile services. It has gotten the Pentosin Oil referenced above at the 5,000, 15,000, and 25,000 mile services which I performed myself.
As you can see if you look at the history the Pentosin Oil does seem to carry a higher TBN longer than the Castrol.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/used-oil-analysis-how-to-decide-what-is-normal/I'm not oil expert, so I will defer to those who know more on the subject. I just have a question about oil change intervals. If the shorter than recommended interval is responsible to the higher wear metals, why would Blackstone recommend even shorter intervals as corrective action?
Perhaps I should wander over to BITOG and do some reading.
This was my exact thoughts when I read his post. It was my understanding that frequent oil changes can do more harm than good. New oil has detergents and such and they essentially scrub your parts until the detergents wear out and the oil adheres to the internal parts forming a protective barrier.So you are in effect keeping your engine in cleaning mode twice as much as you should and never allow the protection of the additive packs to fully adhere to the internal parts and are wondering about wear metals showing up in a UOA?
With your oci you will always be showing higher than avg ppm.
I think that there is to much of this chicken little sky is falling thing propagated on this forum. How many engine wear related failures have been reported here do to high AL in a Blackstone report? I can't find any!!!!!!!!It's about time they updated their averages, after causing several people to go into absolute panics about high aluminum - one guy I know went so far as to trade his TDI Passat in for a gasser due to the high aluminum report.
What I was addressing was the statement that due to a Blackstone report a Passat TDI owner ran for the hills and bought different car not paying any attention to the fact that his had a different TDI engine than Blackstone had a history of, and maybe the folks at Blackstone were giving him info that didn't mean that his engine would have eminent failure. Again I say Chicken Little.^^^You need to realize that anytime there's an anomaly in wear metals in a UOA, there will be an alarm sounded. It only makes sense, because the whole POINT of UOAs is to catch excessive, premature wear by counting metal particles.
As you can see from the reasoned posts above, Blackstone, and doubtless other oil analysis companies, will need to continually update their averages, now that we are seeing that the "high" aluminum count is normal.
Agreed.What I was addressing was the statement that due to a Blackstone report a Passat TDI owner ran for the hills and bought different car not paying any attention to the fact that his had a different TDI engine than Blackstone had a history of, and maybe the folks at Blackstone were giving him info that didn't mean that his engine would have eminent failure. Again I say Chicken Little.