SVTWEB
Veteran Member
I think you need to add about 3,000 more arrows with LEAK on them.... I've seen better designs come out of a government bureaucracy...
Thanks for "pointing" that out!
Here
Hyde,Ill be waiting to see what James & Son has come up with
Yes!! 100% this!! I am a believer that the MPG hit that people see with blocked off EGR is due to the pumping losses associated with a cycling ASV. I have monitored ASV position using an OBD-II scanner (forgot the PID) and it would bounce back and forth depending on the load condition and at cold-startup depending on the water temp. All regardless of the fact that there is no EGR flow detected. I have not had the opportunity to verify this with VCDS but I can say that as soon as I physically unplugged the EGR valve, the ASV stays at 94.9% full-time. It's quite fascinating that this is probably the 2nd or third time that I've seen this phenomenon mentioned on this board, my post(s) included. I mentioned my findings to a popular tuner but have not had a chance to follow-up with VCDS data.yes, no problem when accompanied with proper sw corrections to mitigate the control process. ie, ASV (flap) cycles with egr and when egr is blocked and this flap will normally cycle and starves engine of air killing fuel economy.
Not all tuners kill the egr ASV function (anti-shudder valve). You can check this with engine idling pull off intake pipe. This valve should be wide open and still and not cycling (when tuned). When engine is shut off it should also momentarily close. If tuner turns it off completely that is bad if you have runaway (cant shut off engine runaway). I have seen it still functional and also totally deleted in competitors tunes, not good. The many small details like this are what yields best fuel economy and eliminate part throttle anomalies. Even the oem engineers cannot get this working right during warmup.
Jeff
I don't mean to debate the merits or demerits of working EGR one way or the other. My reply was very specific and directed toward a particular member about a specific topic...i.e. pumping losses due to the ASV not staying open. I am a cancer survivor and so is my older brother so I don't need to be lectured about the dangers of that disease. I disagree that EGR reduces particulate emissions or that diesel "smoke" is somehow categorically worse than gasoline particulate simply because it's more visible. That's pure bunk. My vehicle smokes significantly less with an inop EGR anyway. This is the extent to which I will discuss this because my mind has been made up and I respect your opinions on other TDI-related topics and would like it to stay that way.bl00tdi, I would like to see the egr workable because it helps warm the car up for one thing and reduce partical emmissions ( you have heard of cancer right). You get a AVS hit because the pumping losses( your conclusion) you now have are due to removing the exhaust gases from the the air intake. Well it makes more sense to understand the function of the cooler and repair it.
EGR reduces only NOX, that's it. IIRC I read a study at one time that this EGR provided NOX reduction actually comes with a small increase in HC (visible particulate), CO, etc. IMO, diesel EGR systems are the result of federal regulations gone too far. I am an environmentalist, but a pragmatic one. When I consider what a universal problem diesel EGR systems are and how many cars and trucks that are taken off the road before their time due to EGR issues (coupled with incompetent service) I have to wonder what the environmental cost of all those manufactured replacement vehicles is? We too often forget about resource extraction/manufacturing/distribution environmental costs in cases like these. I expect those far outweigh the minor NOX emissions from non-EGR diesels that are kept in service!I don't mean to debate the merits or demerits of working EGR one way or the other. My reply was very specific and directed toward a particular member about a specific topic...i.e. pumping losses due to the ASV not staying open. I am a cancer survivor and so is my older brother so I don't need to be lectured about the dangers of that disease. I disagree that EGR reduces particulate emissions or that diesel "smoke" is somehow categorically worse than gasoline particulate simply because it's more visible. That's pure bunk. My vehicle smokes significantly less with an inop EGR anyway. This is the extent to which I will discuss this because my mind has been made up and I respect your opinions on other TDI-related topics and would like it to stay that way.
Actually, I have this issue on my 2005.5. And how I originally found the leak was from Malone. He noticed a terrible boost creep.It just gets soot inside the engine compartment and I had horrible fumes coming in through the AC vents. Other than that, I don't believe you will cause any harm to the engine.
Thanks bob for the compliment. I was impressed by your dedication to fixing the problem on your car as well.James & Son, I like your retainer idea. That was genious. Not having to remove the cooler to perform this modification would have been a great labor savings. You ought to start machining kits for this job. Charge people $35 and it would save them hours on the job. Great work (from one who has performed the prior modification of the bushing).
I also see you chose a 16.5 mm OD to the bushing, where I used 17 mm. Maybe there are a lot of suppliers for this POS EGR Cooler.
Great work.