Dr Chill
Veteran Member
Curious if cars previously not claimed via the portal can still be purchased and fully participate in restitution or buyback at full or reduced $.
False, as has repeatedly been discussed here.I bet the one you are looking at has a salvaged title. Make sure it is completely clean or you will be stuck.
Let's be careful here. Reports are starting to come in regarding branded titles being rejected and, as you know, VW is also demonstrating an unwillingness to abide by the terms of the written settlement.False, as has repeatedly been discussed here.
To the OP, yes, such a car would be eligible for the buyback at full restitution, if you could find one.
Yes, the claims hotline is helpless.I just called the support number from the portal and the person who answered said not entitled to $ as did her supervisor. Am I missing something?
The only such report I've seen (or, at least, that I remember) is that of @LeahPharmD (if I got that right), and in her case, the title was branded after she started the process and said it wasn't. I expect her situation will be resolved, though it may require starting over with the claim (which would be a PITA). Are there other examples you can think of?Let's be careful here. Reports are starting to come in regarding branded titles being rejected and, as you know, VW is also demonstrating an unwillingness to abide by the terms of the written settlement.
Dan, could you explain and/or point me to the discussion. The ONLY cars I can find have salvage titles. Why is that? Because the 'investors' are passing on them?False, as has repeatedly been discussed here.
To the OP, yes, such a car would be eligible for the buyback at full restitution, if you could find one.
Yes, you've found the relevant language. Now read it carefully. A car is excluded under this provision only if (1) it had a branded title on 9/18/15, and (2) it was sold by a junkyard or salvage yard after that date. If the car has a title that was first branded after 9/18/15, and it's otherwise eligible and operable, it isn't excluded for the branded title. If it was branded before 9/18/15, and sold by a junkyard before that date as well, that doesn't exclude it. If the title was branded before 9/18/15, but never changed hands after that date, that doesn't exclude it. You can probably come up with other scenarios yourself.Owners whose Volkswagen or Audi 2.0-liter TDI vehicle (i) could not be driven under the power of its own 2.0-liter TDI engine on June 28, 2016, or (ii) had a branded title of assembled, dismantled, flood, junk, rebuilt, reconstructed, or salvage on September 18, 2015, and was acquired from a junkyard or salvage yard after September 18, 2015;
The answer is yes it is eligible as long as no prior claim has been paid on it. Cars to avoid picking up that late would be 2015 2.0l and 2013-15 3.0l as they may have had the fix which disqualifies them and some salvage title cars all other qualified models would still be eligible for buy back.Curious if cars previously not claimed via the portal can still be purchased and fully participate in restitution or buyback at full or reduced $.
Yes, I think 'or' may have been intended. In the proposed Canadian settlement either one of those conditions exclude you from collecting. Looks like they corrected it for us CanucksThanks...looks like that 'and' perhaps should have been an 'or'. Such is the life of VW.
A fix doesn't disqualify a 2.0L from the buyback settlement unless you meant the vehicle has already been fixed and is back on the market.Cars to avoid picking up that late would be 2015 2.0l and 2013-15 3.0l as they may have had the fix which disqualifies them
Yes, it does. From the FTC Consent Order's definition of Eligible Vehicle on pages 7-8:A fix doesn't disqualify a 2.0L from the buyback settlement unless you meant the vehicle has already been fixed and is back on the market.
Once the car has had the fix applied, it is no longer eligible for the buyback other than under the lemon law-like provision (which provides no restitution).V. “Eligible Vehicle” means Model Year 2009 through 2015 Volkswagen light-duty vehicles equipped with 2.0-liter TDI engines that . . . (4) have not been modified pursuant to an Approved Emissions Modification.
You can check that yourself, as long as you have the VIN, at https://www.vwdiesellookup.com/.About to put a deposit on the vehicle but waiting for confirmation the car has not had the software fix for phase 1. I will require them to put that in writing as part of the deal.
Well there has been one report of a car going in for an unrelated issue and having the fix applied to the car without the owners knowledge. Huge mistake - not sure of the outcome yet...Thx. Car not listed as part of the settlement. Any chance it can have the software upodate and not be part of the settlement? I wonder what the status of HighPlainsDrifter's car would be since they flashed his software without his approval and not scheduling it via the portal. Gonna PM him.
I'm still confused how they would determine this; by looking at previous registration and determining if it was road legal on that exact day? That might be pretty easy to do, if history shows an accident/total loss before June 28 2016, and the next title event and registration doesn't get recorded until after that date.• Owners whose Volkswagen or Audi 2.0-liter TDI vehicle (i) could not be driven under
the power of its own 2.0-liter TDI engine on June 28, 2016[/I]
Really, I don't know either. I'm pretty sure that if the car can be driven under its own power now, it's fine, irrespective of what its previous history might have been (what if a car with perfectly clean title and no accident history had just been in the shop on 6/28/16?). But if not, and the claim is being made that it was drivable on 6/28/16, I really don't know how that would be shown. I'd have to expect that would be decided on a case-by-case basis though.I'm still confused how they would determine this;
YUP= I had to "restart the claim" .... at day 13 post submission waiting to hear what they say...The only such report I've seen (or, at least, that I remember) is that of @LeahPharmD (if I got that right), and in her case, the title was branded after she started the process and said it wasn't. I expect her situation will be resolved, though it may require starting over with the claim (which would be a PITA). Are there other examples you can think of?
I'd also add that I bought an eligible 2-liter vehicle on 7 Oct, at a price that would still return a decent profit if I were to sell it back. They're few and far between, but they aren't all gone (yet). Whether any will be there a year from now, nobody knows.
If someone in the lease buys out the car, my understanding is that this person wouldn't qualify for a full buyback. But what I were to then buy this car from the prior lessee, would I qualify?False, as has repeatedly been discussed here.
To the OP, yes, such a car would be eligible for the buyback at full restitution, if you could find one.