Abacus
That helpful B4 guy
Then my B4V should blow most things away, yet Prius owners aren't attracted to them, they're repelled.
LOL, I had one for 3 years, got it for next to nothing-dealership trade in-oil was coming out of his dash so he had enough-Lube place put gear oil in and it migrated up the speedo cable, Fixed it up and never got below 50 mpg combined-but no a/c, cruise vs my TDI sedan that averages 40 mpg and has it all. It sucked for trips though, extended 120 km/h road trips were noisey and scary, lol.It's amazing how far we haven't progressed with gasoline consumption.
No need for a time machine, just find one for sale and go buy one, its already depreciated,If I had access to a time machine, I'm undecided on what I'd do about my car. Possibly get a '03 Jetta Wagon, maybe a '96 B4V, or possibly a brand-new '96 Elantra Wagon.
Plug in the numbers in that formula for a Ram ProMaster full-size van. You can use 18 mpg for the fuel consumption even though mine is doing a little better than that.
Even just using rough numbers for the cargo area alone and not counting the driver's compartment, it's around 6000!
GoFaster, you beat me to it. Even using 5 1/2 MPG (40,000 pound load in hilly areas), I'd definitely blow that away. After all, you can fit 3 of his vehicle in my trailer.For a road-going vehicle, a tractor-trailer rig with a 53 foot box trailer should blow that formula away!
Interesting comment.As for lies about the Prius, search Google for "Prius myths." Then there was that VW press release in 2008 that reported getting higher than EPA mileage, which the "defeat device" did.
Bob Wilson
It comes from this source:Interesting comment.
Not my intent. VW worked hard to keep folks blind to what was going on. This included making sure we don't communicate and share what we know about each others rides.Yes, Bob you are right. I'll go hide under the bridge again.
Actually in America we choose to drive larger and larger vehicles that get worse and worse mileage. No surprises here base on the laws of physic.Really, we should have 100mpg cars now, but instead we have safer 46mpg cars.
Concur. And didn't someone post on here a while back that U.S. truck and SUV sales are again climbing now that pump prices are at an all-time low?Actually in America we choose to drive larger and larger vehicles that get worse and worse mileage. No surprises here base on the laws of physic.
Our non-commercial US fleet average MPG is what, around the low 20's lately. I bet you the same average was not much worse in the mid 1970's. Said average has not increased significantly primarily because of our choices of what vehicles to buy and not because of the science not helping (primarily).
C'mon, how many times have you heard from somebody saying 'I wish I could but that nice truck, the latest and greatest, to move that large piece of furniture once every ... '?
I disagree with this statement. It should read:Corporations produce what people want to buy.
Fair enough. And yes, I have had the opportunity to drive some of the RoW vehicles- I got to drive several HiLuxes on some of my overseas adventures and geesh, I'd nearly kill to be able to bring a HiLux stateside.I disagree with this statement. It should read:
Corporations produce what people will buy.
Suffice to say, if they don't sell it, we can't buy it, so they have a directed audience that they are directing. This also goes back to the whole 'auto vs manual' discussion.
Give me a Scirocco or HiLux any day of the week over the crap we're spoon fed over here. Have you actually driven some of today's vehicles? They're light years away from the European versions. Of course it takes going over there and actually driving some to find out, but trust me, we're getting the chaff and not the crop.
Agree'd, I was in Germany in 1995, rented an Opel Astra-budget car back then, it was rock solid on the Autobahn, handled like a dream, got decent mpg, the only crappy thing is it wouldn't go passed 200 km/h, . DRove a same era Golf too, was pretty scary on the Autobahn, wouldn't keep a straight line, Last one we rented was an N/A Audi wagon, max speed was 200 km/h, wicked to drive but man did it drink fuel.I disagree with this statement. It should read:
Corporations produce what people will buy.
Suffice to say, if they don't sell it, we can't buy it, so they have a directed audience that they are directing. This also goes back to the whole 'auto vs manual' discussion.
Give me a Scirocco or HiLux any day of the week over the crap we're spoon fed over here. Have you actually driven some of today's vehicles? They're light years away from the European versions. Of course it takes going over there and actually driving some to find out, but trust me, we're getting the chaff and not the crop.
The tech info posted concerning the Prius drivetrain is interesting and it is all well and good, but it doesn't make me despise the vehicle it's in any less. The drivetrain in the Prius is very well engineered and I've said so myself many times before. But if it's in a vehicle that I dislike for other reasons ... there is no way I'm going to be buying it.Bob,
....I have to ask again, what are you doing in this forum? I don't think you'll get many Prius converters, even after dieselgate. Btw my other vehicle gets 55 mpg, is brilliant in city traffic, especially the crappy pot-holed roads around North Philly, produces about 145hp, accelerates from 0-60 in about 3 seconds, and only costs $350 a year to insure, and that is why 9 months out of the year I commute on my KTM 1190R - perfect as there is only me!! I will add the only potential problem I face are car/bike-jackers, something you probably are immune to in a Prius; you're certainly not driving something cool enough to be robbed of it at gunpoint along Erie Avenue lol!
Disagree!Marketing = finding out what people want to buy
Sales = getting people to buy what you have
Auto companies are far more driven by sales than marketing. They decide they're able to build something (a hybrid, a 700 HP muscle car, a ginormous SUV) and then launch a sales campaign to get people to buy it. What they call marketing is usually closer to sales planning. Companies are driven by regulations, engineering, production capability, leveraging existing platforms and drivetrains to save money...all kinds of things that are independent of asking consumers what they want to buy.
Ask 100 drivers if they're perfectly happy with the car they have and I bet more than 80 will say either "no," or "yes, but..." People continuously complain that their cars are too expensive to buy, depreciate too fast, are too complex, break too often, use too much fuel...you name it.
But that's just it, they have been shown in other countries yet are still denied here. We can only choose from what we're spoon fed and we have no choice in the menu.People don't know what hey want until its shown to them. Steve Jobs did that perfectly with the iPhone and tablets.
Yup, he showed me exactly what dumbed down crap looked like, and I promptly bought superior Android devices, and I thank him for that!People don't know what hey want until its shown to them. Steve Jobs did that perfectly with the iPhone and tablets.
But we've been shown and we want it but our dumb governments won't let us, So it still applies, We have a choice if you have deep pockets, lol.But that's just it, they have been shown in other countries yet are still denied here. We can only choose from what we're spoon fed and we have no choice in the menu.
That's not he point, he made it, people bought it, got rich, died, case closed.Yup, he showed me exactly what dumbed down crap looked like, and I promptly bought superior Android devices, and I thank him for that!
- Tim
Incorrect.Then as these battery packages wear out what do you do with them, they are not recyclable.
Sharing information. For example, I went back and took another look at the Argonne Labs data:Bob,
....I have to ask again, what are you doing in this forum? . . .
Or are you selling? It sounds to me like you're either trying to sell the Prius on a TDI board or are trying to convince yourself you made the right purchase.Sharing information.
The TDI turns the fuel off when coasting in gear, and diesel fuel has a higher BTU content, requiring less to perform the same work. What we do not have in this country is a diesel that will automatically turn off the engine when the transmission is put in neutral and the tires are not moving. They do this in Europe but not in the US, I wonder why since it obviously 'saves fuel'.Both hybrids mostly turn off the engine when braking or slowing down. Also, both hybrid engines will burn a little more fuel because they put charge in the traction battery as well as keeping the car rolling. In contrast, the TDI only provides the dyno required power, a lower engine output.
Why do you keep going on about hybrids, you know this is a TDI site, right?About the Jetta hybrid, I suspect VW implemented acceleration and steering more along the ways Jetta owners like. In contrast, the Prius carries on the same Toyota 'car is an appliance' style. But there is one hope for the TDI fix.
If the VW fix can turn the engine to idle fuel consumption rates when braking or slowing, it should improve the MPG. We can only hope.
Bob Wilson
How does the Jetta hybrid, dynamics rate?All the charts in the world can't change driving dynamics.