compu_85
Gadget Guy
It sounds like they refueled before the car ran out. In any event, this is what pump my Passat has:[*]Do Passats have Botch CP4 pumps?
[/LIST]
It sounds like they refueled before the car ran out. In any event, this is what pump my Passat has:[*]Do Passats have Botch CP4 pumps?
[/LIST]
and accomplishes what? ....
if you're the slowest driver on the road how can you draft someone?and accomplishes what? drive slower than the limit....annoy drivers behind for sure....draft probably not too safely....if I drive my Camaro at 30mph in 6th gear I might get 40MPG out of her!!! wow....better mileage than I get in my TDI.....
And a lot of stops. Stops kill mileage.if you're the slowest driver on the road how can you draft someone?
and once again we're beating a dead horse,,,, they uses small rural roads which are open to passing most of the time *(not on turns or hills) as far as my experiences goes with driving on them.
take your Camaro do 40 MPG and you too will have set a record for that particular vehicle
yes you missed itAm I missing something, or did they not report their fill up volume in VA? If they didn't run out of fuel then their actual mpg's would be even greater, right?
so many non believers,
i am impressed, its not the way i would drive , i'd gladly pay extra for all the MPG's i loose, but that doesnt mean i'm not happy or impressed to see those numbers.
i keep telling myself that when i have a perfect road trip lined up i will try to catch my 800m/tank UNICORN,
technically they drove the speed limits or very close to it (5 under? we see that all the time) im sure on smaller rural roads people can just go around, so i dont see an issue of being stuck being them *(its not like they camped in the left lane at 60MPH on a 80 MPH freeway)
and am i really the first person to say: what about HPFP running out of fuel?
EDIT : i just saw someone beat me to HPFP
Am I missing something, or did they not report their fill up volume in VA? If they didn't run out of fuel then their actual mpg's would be even greater, right?
I did not read they ran dry. Actually, Tom is correct. All calculations are based on amount of D2 pumped BEFORE the trip. Assuming the car did not run dry, the actual fuel economy is unknown. In all fairness the story is about miles traveled, not MPG. And if you want to get technical, IF they ran dry, then >19.322 was consumed. But at 1,626 miles the small difference in fuel consumption is negligible.yes you missed it they drained the tank completely filled it to the brim, sealed the door ,, and of they went till they ran out dry
There is no mention of them running out of fuel at the end of the run, and the car is shown at a Shell station when the VA cop is verifying the odo. Unless they were towed or coasted there, they did not appear to run out of fuel. I'm curious what that final fill was.yes you missed it
they drained the tank completely
filled it to the brim,
sealed the door ,, and of they went till they ran out dry
Do the math for fun. 1626 miles divided by 3 days divided by 14 hours is less than 40 mph. My map program shows about 1,400 miles by interstate and 1629 miles if you avoid interstates. So when they claim they did 60 mph on the highway that could be true as they were barely on the interstate. Probably annoying as heck doing 40 on rural roads with 55 mph posted. If they did the short route and drove 60 mph average they would have taken 23.5 hours. Heck 1600 miles at 60 mph is 26.6 hours. You might conclude it took them 3 days at 14 hours or 52 hours. They certainly were not driving 60 mph very often.
Regarding average speed, the couple did 14 hour stints in the car with sleep in between each stint. It's important to note that they arrived at their destination at 2pm on the third day (as shown on their check in log).BadMonKey said:If they are willing to lie about their speed of travel its not that big of jump to lie about the vehicle towing them down rural roads.
If they are willing to lie about their speed of travel its not that big of jump to lie about the vehicle towing them down rural roads.
Sorry i don't buy a 100+% fuel economy jump from hyper-milling. I also cant believe the 2L option here would beat the old record held by the 1.6L TDI in Europe.
You can also note the record is still held by the 1.6L TDI because Guinness wont accept new records from the Taylor's after they where banned for undisclosed reasons (cough, cough cheating) at the Kia 48-contiguous State Fuel Economy WR event.
http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-1/longest-fuel-range-(standard)/
I'd like to see some kind of back up as well..
You can also note the record is still held by the 1.6L TDI because Guinness wont accept new records from the Taylor's after they where banned for undisclosed reasons (cough, cough cheating) at the Kia 48-contiguous State Fuel Economy WR event.
http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-1/longest-fuel-range-(standard)/
You wont find anything official posted and if you contact Guiness directly they have a cookie cutter response. I heard it from someone connected to Kia.BadMonKey - I'm having trouble finding info about why the Taylors are supposedly banned from Guinness or other articles about foul play on their part. Do you have a link?
Do you think they would use hotel managers and local law enforcement if a Guiness judge was present which is required to be official?This new record is, what, all of 4 days old? Guinness acceptance and website changes will take longer than that.
From the Guinness site, "Please note that the presence of an official GWR adjudicator is not compulsory in order to attempt a GWR record."Do you think they would use hotel managers and local law enforcement if a Guiness judge was present which is required to be official?
here you go dudeI don't see any mention of foul play in the clean mpg forum link.
The source for that quote is from Wayne Gerdes (a rival hypermiler) on the cleanmpg forum- please provide something directly from Guiness if you have it.here you go dude
"Guinness told us during the Kia 48-contiguous State Fuel Economy WR, the couple got into a bit of trouble last year for something Guinness officials would not disclose. Unfortunately for all, Guinness no longer accepts WR drives from them so whatever it was it is not good"
I did not read they ran dry. Actually, Tom is correct. All calculations are based on amount of D2 pumped BEFORE the trip.
sorry guys this record was covered by all major car related sites, and i just thought that this was the link that had all the details...There is no mention of them running out of fuel at the end of the run, and the car is shown at a Shell station when the VA cop is verifying the odo. Unless they were towed or coasted there, they did not appear to run out of fuel. I'm curious what that final fill was.