www.tdiclub.com

Economy - Longevity - Performance
The #1 Source of TDI Information on the Web!
Forums Articles Links Meets
Orders TDI Club Cards TDIFest 2016 Gone, but not forgotten VAG-Com List Unit Conversions TDIClub Chat Thank You




Go Back   TDIClub Forums > VW TDI Discussion Areas > TDI (Diesel) Emissions

TDI (Diesel) Emissions This is a discussion about emissions from TDI's. Pro's cons of Diesels (including biodiesel) effects on the environment and how they compare to Gasoline and other fuel sources for Internal combustion engines.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Yesterday, 11:12   #121
leicaman
Veteran Member
 
leicaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Fuel Economy: Much better than the average car... :o)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oilhammer View Post
I never understood why people bought those new when the Nissan dealer was selling the Pathfinder for so much less, even the tarted up trim level. At least those looked better than the vomit inducing SUVs Infiniti now has at their lot. Gosh, they just get uglier and uglier as time goes on.
I think Nissan's designers are on some special meds. I don't quite understand it. Same goes for some Lexus designs IMHO. But do not forget. Back in the late 1950s remember how some Studebakers, DeSotos and Chrysler Imperials looked in that period. Holy Toledo! Top on my ugly list was the '58 Packard Hawk and 61 DeSoto.
__________________
2005 Passat GLS TDI, 197k miles, or 317040KM. Now a daily driver Chainless and Gear Driven via the procedure by Oilhammer 06/17/2009, ngk hybrid glowplugs, Chainless and proud of it! Mileage?....adequate I just wish the new TDIs weren't so complex and controversial.

Last edited by leicaman; Yesterday at 11:14.
leicaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 22:56   #122
tadawson
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lewisville, TX
Default

CARB is a bunch of imbeciles that overregulate everything they touch. A far gentler regulatory touch will have exactly the same positive effect.
tadawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 11:22   #123
Oilerlord
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssamalin View Post

Sure hope we see CARB compliant diesels or our cities will be as polluted as London. I live in a smog ridden city. I treat kids and seniors suffocating in it. That's why regulations are necessary. They have saved the well being of millions. If you don't like CARB, guess you don't watch your kid trying to breath. Enjoy your smoggy cars with President Trump, just hope you don't have to take your grandkids to the ER to be intubated.
Dude: Chill. You're raising your blood pressure. Heart attacks kill people.
__________________

Malone Stage 2 / DSG Flash / Rawtek Exhaust.
Oilerlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests)
Ralphy
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EPA mulls over urea-injection rules TDIMeister TDI (Diesel) Emissions 26 September 8th, 2006 22:50
Supreme Court Rules on EPA Air Quality Sun Baked GL TDI (Diesel) Emissions 16 March 4th, 2001 18:40
EPA rules! Janusz Fuels & Lubricants 2 February 28th, 2001 19:45
WSJ - New EPA Rules May Fuel Profits Sun Baked GL TDI (Diesel) Emissions 5 February 6th, 2001 01:45
EPA nominee would review Clinton diesel rules Eolair TDI (Diesel) Emissions 5 January 19th, 2001 15:12


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:57.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright - TDIClub Online LTD - 2014
Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Forum Rules | Disclaimer
TDIClub Online Ltd (TDIClub.com) is not affiliated with the VWoA or VWAG and is supported by contributions from viewers like you.
1996 - 2015, All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.12752 seconds with 12 queries
[Output: 61.80 Kb. compressed to 56.16 Kb. by saving 5.64 Kb. (9.13%)]