Well, the preferred "cleaner" for this around here is a product called "DeOxit D5" from CAIG... it's not easy to find, but it has a way of chemically attacking the corrosion... sometimes more than one "treatment" is needed... It comes in both spray and liquid forms... I bought the tiny bottle of liquid, but I forget why I decided on that...tortdi said:treating the harness with contact cleaner was not elaborated on, (unless i missed that part). Does that just involve spraying the cleaner into the harness sockets and hoping for the best?
Very unlikely unless you've had the CEL on from the time the car was new... Either the computer is seeing the proper (more-or-less equal) current draw from all 4 glow plugs, or it will throw a code...katzw said:Would a CEL for glow plug cylinders 1 & 3 be caused by the wiring harness being wired incorrectly (or, in this case, backwards?) in a PD 2005 Jetta? Engine fired just fine, no other problems, just the CEL.
Hey Yuri,ymz said:Very unlikely unless you've had the CEL on from the time the car was new... Either the computer is seeing the proper (more-or-less equal) current draw from all 4 glow plugs, or it will throw a code...
On the PD engines (2004-and-newer in North America), the glow plugs are ceramic - and FRAGILE... if you do have dead glow plugs, if you keep running the car with them, they'll "grow" a layer of carbon on the tip, and will be more likely to break off when finally removed... (when the GP's are functioning, they tend to burn off that carbon layer...)
All the best,
Yuri.
ymz said:If the wiring harness was replaced, they could have made insecure connections for the wires going to GP's # 1 and 3... (or else messed up the wiring completely)...
I hope the dealer was paying for all this work, as it sounds a lot like what we see around here: clueless dealers (and garages) just throwing parts at a problem hoping that one of them "fixes" whatever it was that was faulty...
I'd get away and find a real TDI expert to take care of your car... (but give whoever replaced the harness a chance to go over their "work" and get it right this time...)
All the best,
Yuri.
PS: in Vancouver, we all have a high regard for Tony at Andes Auto Service...
Seeing as I have a PD with 88K (out of warranty) and I just got a P0672 yesterday I have the following questions.ymz said:Very unlikely unless you've had the CEL on from the time the car was new... Either the computer is seeing the proper (more-or-less equal) current draw from all 4 glow plugs, or it will throw a code...
On the PD engines (2004-and-newer in North America), the glow plugs are ceramic - and FRAGILE... if you do have dead glow plugs, if you keep running the car with them, they'll "grow" a layer of carbon on the tip, and will be more likely to break off when finally removed... (when the GP's are functioning, they tend to burn off that carbon layer...)
All the best,
Yuri.
Excellent points all around... I wish I had a solution... let's hope some of the more ingenious and experienced TDI-Techs (you know who you are !!!!) join in this thread and provide help... I think it's a topic that deserves major consideration, given how many people are liable to be affected... (Perhaps its own thread???)04PDWagon said:Seeing as I have a PD with 88K (out of warranty) and I just got a P0672 yesterday I have the following questions.
Would it be better to remove them when hot so as to hopefully have burned off any carbon buildup? Or better to remove when cold so that thermal expansion hasn't narrowed the passage through where they exit?
Should one break...would rotating the crank until the intake valves open and then using compressed air to pressurize the intake/cylinder be enough to dislodge the broken piece? Just trying to get geared up for anything that I may encounter.
thanks
Unless there's a super-secret way to remove them safely that the VW engineers know but for some reason kept to themselves...Wingnut said:So much damage can occur for such a simple procedure as changing a $25 part.
It often takes more than one treatment with DeOxit for it to get rid of sufficient corrosion... (I needed it done twice, and it's been fine for over 2 years since...) As well, some mechanical scrubbing may help as well. (Some people also gently squeeze the outside of the harness at the connection points using pliers... careful not to overdo this and break the whole thing...)ukguy said:I bought a can of Deoxit D5 and sprayed it into all the contacts on the harness, cleared the code and started the engine, the fault didn't reappear immediately. I then re-checked using Vagcom the day after and the above fault code has come back.
Normally Cylinder # 1 is the one closest to the front of the engine (where the belts are)... Some of the earlier VW models had the glow plug numbering reversed to the cylinder numbering, although by your model year that should have been synchronized - but who knows... As another of our esteemed Gurus (MOGolf) suggested, to be certain, disconnect one of the glow plug connectors (let's say # 2), run the car 'till there's a CEL, and read the code...ukguy said:Thanks very much for the reply mrchill and ymz. So I really do know which cylinder plug (connection) I am dealing with, please can you tell me which is cylinder 1 when looking from the front bumper? Then I will concentrate on that connector. Engine code shows as BKC (1.9 tdi 105bhp) on my mk5 2004 model Golf.
Also, the check engine light hasn't flashed (it's the glow plug light on my car) signifying a problem, should it throw up a warning if one of the glow plugs (or connectors) is actually faulty?
Thanks again guys.
I assumed I was kind of leaning to doing the test that way but wasn't totally sure if it would cause any ongoing problems. Am I right in saying the glow plugs serve no purpose when the temperature is above around 2C? Maybe that's the reason I haven't experienced any symptoms, as it only gets down to that in the middle of winter in my part of the UK (Manchester).ymz said:Normally Cylinder # 1 is the one closest to the front of the engine (where the belts are)... Some of the earlier VW models had the glow plug numbering reversed to the cylinder numbering, although by your model year that should have been synchronized - but who knows... As another of our esteemed Gurus (MOGolf) suggested, to be certain, disconnect one of the glow plug connectors (let's say # 2), run the car 'till there's a CEL, and read the code...
Definitely sure I wasn't getting any warning come up in the cluster, first thing I knew about the problem was when I connected the Vagcom. I have just re-read that part of the manual for my car and it states that the glow plug light will flash if there is an Engine fault. It has never flashed...ymz said:BTW: are you sure you weren't getting a CEL (= MIL = malfunction indicator light or check engine light) ??? A flashing glow plug light is normally related to brake light issues... either a burned out brake light or a bad brake light switch...
Can a glow plug be faulty if the glow plug fault code (P0671) goes away and comes back a day or so later, after at least a couple of starts?MOGolf said:I see Oilhammer has documented a process to try to avoid breaking the ceramic GPs. The main point: take it slow, easy, carefully.
Ahh I understand now, so major I get the glow plug light flashing on my car only if there is a very major problem detected by the engine controller.MOGolf said:UKguy, the "check engine light" for the glow plug fault is a US government mandated feature that you don't have the pleasure of receiving. Canada gets it because they pretty much say if it's good for US it's good for them for the emissions standards and features.
The detection system appears to be coded so that it keeps track of the number of times (possibly up to 4) that it detects the fault before setting the code.ukguy said:Can a glow plug be faulty if the glow plug fault code (P0671) goes away and comes back a day or so later, after at least a couple of starts?
Still 15 Nm = 11 ft-lbs. The point here is to get them in tight enough so they don't back out or leak compression past the threads. Don't overdo it. They don't hold the entire engine together.ukguy said:Also, when tightening the new plugs, is the correct torque for my mk5 engine 11 ft/lb as stated in the first post? Or has it changed for the more recent engines? Just so I don't mess it up at that stage...
That makes sense, thank you.MOGolf said:The detection system appears to be coded so that it keeps track of the number of times (possibly up to 4) that it detects the fault before setting the code.
Understood, then 15Nm it is then. I prefer to use the torque wrench for anything engine related so I don't overtighten and cause massive issuesMOGolf said:Still 15 Nm = 11 ft-lbs. The point here is to get them in tight enough so they don't back out or leak compression past the threads. Don't overdo it. They don't hold the entire engine together.