www.tdiclub.com

Economy - Longevity - Performance
The #1 Source of TDI Information on the Web!
Forums Articles Links Meets
Orders TDI Club Cards TDIFest 2016 Gone, but not forgotten VAG-Com List Unit Conversions TDIClub Chat Thank You

Order your TDIClub merchandise and help support TDIClub


Go Back   TDIClub Forums > VW TDI Discussion Areas > TDI News/Tech

TDI News/Tech This Forum is for the posting of TDI news related items.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 9th, 2020, 16:23   #76
03GolfTDI
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Default

Ughhh that article made me want to throw my computer - looks like author just Google searched best and worst engines and put something together based on that. SMH

Corners cut and cost cutting? Yeah they wrote some ECU code to cheat emissions but I would hardly call the final 2 generations (in the US) TDI's some cheap corner and cost cutting lump.

How about the rampant BMW DI fuel pump failures, Toyota 1.8/2.4/2.5 oil guzzlers, Toyota 2.4 head gasket failures, sludged Toyota 2.2 and 3.0 engines, Nissan 2.5's eating their cat converters.....I could go on and on.
__________________
Adam
'16 e-Golf SE - 59k.

'11 Jetta Sportwagen TDI DSG - 52k
Candy White/Beige
03GolfTDI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2020, 17:57   #77
Shadow040
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Default

I know the Ford EcoTech or boost or whatever they're called have the timing belts inside the oil system where they get brittle and crack. And the older direct injection petrol engines from VAG have chain problems and the intake manifolds clog up from EGR residue. Doesn't sound better than either of my TDIs!
Shadow040 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2020, 19:27   #78
[486]
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: St.Paul, MN
TDI(s): 02 golf ALH
Fuel Economy: 42 stock, 47-49 now
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow040 View Post
I know the Ford EcoTech or boost or whatever they're called have the timing belts inside the oil system where they get brittle and crack.
old honda motorcycle motors had wet timing belts
I don't remember them being all that failure prone
[486] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2020, 14:34   #79
BeetlePD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Santa Ana CA
TDI(s): Beetle 2005
Default

To be fair to the author: The UK insurance industry routinely tracks how many engines suffered breakdown (and insurance had to fix them). They produced a ranking showing Honda, Toyota, Mercedes, Ford (Europe) suffered the fewest engine failures.

At the bottom of the list was BMW, Audi, Volkswagen engines (VW was third to last). Now these are ALL engines not just TDI, but itvdoes indicate Audi/VW engineers habitually produce poor reliability

.
BeetlePD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2020, 18:31   #80
Powder Hound
Veteran Member
 
Powder Hound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Conkud, New Hampshiyuh, USA
Default

I stand by what I said. The article had nothing to do with failure rates, not when you're comparing exoticar engines that in real life have nothing on any daily driver driven by real humans.

But, BeetlePD's comments do have merit. Overengineering with poor execution makes for a really bad reputation because the results aren't anywhere near the initial promises.

Cheers,

PH
__________________
You always pay for what you get. Sometimes you get what you pay for.
It is called dope because it does make you dumb.
Thinking outside the box is difficult for some. They're afraid they'll fall off the edge of the box and be lost to oblivion.
Powder Hound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28th, 2020, 15:31   #81
lemoncurd
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Vancouver, WA | Willimantic, CT
Fuel Economy: Mid 40's
Default

I used to drive a 3V 5.4L triton, and the amount of time I've had to get a new coil pack, a new cam solenoid, or how many damn times a spark plug snapped in that engine is insane. So glad that my "worst engine ever" has been trouble-free for 119k now...
Oh, I take that back, I had a P2015 error which was permanently fixed with a $15 part and 15min of free time in the parking lot of my work. Yeah this mid 40 mpg's suck too, I wish I had that triton back because it was so much cleaner and safer for the environment running on 7/8 cyl most of the time! /s

The person that wrote this article is an absolute nut job who doesn't realize what they're talking about
-lc
__________________
Stock, for now!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by amstel78 View Post
I don't normally replace fuel filters, but when I do, I don't use vagcom.
lemoncurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2020, 13:21   #82
D. Lynch
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hazeltown Canada
Default

Our chipped tdi Jetta was a delight. It was stinking fast, and economical.

Some maintenance issues...mass airflow sensors...
D. Lynch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2020, 05:29   #83
Dannyboy
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Mb
TDI(s): 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oilhammer View Post
I have not seen much of any issues with the 6.7L. Which is actually a Ford engine (the earlier Powerstroke V8s were all Navistar).
Seen 3 blown engines in 2 years with 6.7, exhaust valves head breaks off is a common issue .Those 6.0 international engines weren't that bad , just had to spend alot to keep them running and making them "bulletproof"

I didn't click on the link either, it's just a smear campaign. Haters need to hate something, it's a world of " Cant beat the competition, talk s$%t about them " people now. Sad to see how as a human race we seem to be going backwards and de-evolving. I'm happy driving my economy diesel that puts a smile on my face when I realize how much people spend on their trucks.
Dannyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 16th, 2020, 18:54   #84
Anomicman
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Saint-Zéphirin de Courval QC
Fuel Economy: 4.3 l/100 km
Default

I can squeeze about 1,500 km from the tank during summer, about 1,200 during the worst months of winter, and road trips will yield around 1,700 km ; all of this after the VW “fix”. Seems to me that an engine using so little fuel, comparatively to any gasoline engine, could also be less “dangerous” to people’s health. But hey...
Anomicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2020, 22:50   #85
BeetlePD
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Santa Ana CA
TDI(s): Beetle 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Powder Hound View Post
This writer has a hard on for unfathomably expensive high end gas engines, even the ones where the manufacturers lied
He’s also obsessed with BMWs which insurance companies rate as least reliable (frequent engine breakdowns). Oh well. If he loves BMW he ought to try the Inline-6 diesel engines. They takeoff like a rocket

🚀
BeetlePD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda Insight is "Biblically terrible. Possibly the worst new car money can buy." Antsrcool General Automotive 82 June 9th, 2009 09:30
HELP: Looking for VW Dealer near Burlington - Named "Russ's" or "Russell" ?? kevk555 Ontario 2 May 26th, 2009 13:21
Interesting Video About Catalytic Converters (and an "Un-Named" car company) flatopete TDI (Diesel) Emissions 1 August 23rd, 2007 17:03
Bush: "Reduce dependence on foreign crude oil." Pseudobrit Fuels & Lubricants 58 September 24th, 2002 11:14


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright - TDIClub Online LTD - 2017
Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Forum Rules | Disclaimer
TDIClub Online Ltd (TDIClub.com) is not affiliated with the VWoA or VWAG and is supported by contributions from viewers like you.
© 1996 - 2020, All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.14711 seconds with 13 queries
[Output: 99.76 Kb. compressed to 85.53 Kb. by saving 14.22 Kb. (14.26%)]